全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

基于二系垂向作动器与压电作动器的动车组车体振动控制
Vibration control of EMU car body based on secondary vertical actuators and piezoelectric actuators

Keywords: 车辆工程,动车组,车辆振动控制,鲁棒控制,二系垂向作动器,压电作动器,权函数
vehicle engineering
,EMU,vehicle vibration control,robust control,secondary vertical actuator,piezoelectric actuator,weight function

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了减小高速动车组车体刚性与弹性振动,提出了一种基于二系垂向作动器与车体压电作动器的高速动车组车体振动主动控制方法; 基于某型高速动车组,设计了一种在车辆二系安装垂向作动器,在车体底架布置压电作动器,运用H ??SymboleB@ 鲁棒最优控制器进行车辆协调控制的主动减振方法; 建立了基于车辆动力学参数的刚柔耦合减振力学模型,采用H2及H∞准则优化压电作动器与压电传感器布置位置,运用鲁棒最优控制方法设计了H∞反馈控制器; 利用MATLAB仿真了减振装置与主动控制方法对车辆动力学性能的影响,比较了被动悬挂车辆、仅安装二系垂向作动器车辆与采用主动控制车辆的动力学性能差异。研究结果表明:压电作动器与压电传感器布置在距车体左端距离为7.15、12.25、17.35 m处车体一阶及二阶弹性模态归一化H2及H∞范数最大,可以作为压电作动器与传感器的布置位置; 基于二系垂向作动器与车体压电作动器的鲁棒最优控制方法能够有效地抑制车体的振动,一阶垂弯振动频率处车体中部和转向架上方的加速度功率谱分别减小为被动悬挂车辆的5%、10%; 速度越大,振动加速度抑制效果越明显,当车辆的运行速度为200 km?h-1时,车体振动加速度均方根减小10%,当车辆的运行速度为350 km?h-1时,车体振动加速度均方根减小18%; 相对于被动悬挂,二系垂向作动器输出力功率谱在车体浮沉与点头振动频率处的量级为106 N2?Hz-1,对车体刚性振动有较大抑制作用,压电作动器电压功率谱在车体一阶垂弯振动频率处达到峰值4 000 V2?Hz-1,对车体弹性振动有较大抑制作用。
To reduce the rigid and elastic vibration of car body of high-speed electric multiple units(EMU), the active vibration control method was proposed based on secondary vertical actuators and car body piezoelectric actuators. Based on a certain type of high-speed EMU, an active reducing method of vibration was designed in which vertical actuators were installed in the secondary suspension, piezoelectric actuators were arranged in the under-frame of the car body, and an H∞ robust optimal controller was used to coordinate the vehicle control. A mechanics model of rigid-flexible coupled vibration reduction based on vehicle dynamics parameters was established. The placement positions of the piezoelectric actuators and sensors were optimized by using the H2 and H∞ norms. The H∞ feedback controller was designed by robust optimal control method. The effect of vibration damper and active control method on vehicle dynamic performance was simulated by MATLAB. The dynamic performance differences between passive suspension vehicle, secondary vertical actuators vehicle and active control vehicle were compared. Analysis results show that when the piezoelectric actuators and the piezoelectric sensors are arranged at the distances of 7.15, 12.25, and 17.35 m from the left end of the car body, the normalized H2 and H∞ norms of the first and second-order elastic modes of the car body are the largest, and can be used as the placement positions of piezoelectric actuators and sensors. The robust optimal control method based on the secondary vertical actuators and car body piezoelectric actuators can effectively suppress vibration of the car body, and the acceleration power spectrums of the first order vertical bending vibration frequency on the car body centre and above the bogie reduce by 5% and 10% of passive suspension vehicle, respectively. With higher velocity, the vibration acceleration

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133