全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2015 

51种昆虫足的爬行粘附结构研究
Study on the ultrastructures of the attachment apparatus of 51 insect species

DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2015.02.005

Keywords: 粘附,超微结构,光滑型,刚毛型
adhesion
,ultrastructure,smooth,hairy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要 利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对7目51种昆虫足的粘附结构进行超微形态观察.根据形态和着生位置, 共发现光滑型、刚毛型和吸盘3大类粘附结构.光滑型粘附结构可以进一步划分为光滑型中垫、光滑型爪垫和光滑型跗垫;刚毛型粘附结构可划分为跗节刚毛型粘附底面、刚毛型爪垫和爪间突、海绵窝, 以及跗节棘特化的粘附结构等;吸盘是龙虱科昆虫特化的吸附结构.在目级阶元上, 粘附结构的类型及形态具有显著差异, 可作为分类鉴定及系统发育研究的重要特征.

References

[1]  Walker G. Adhesion to smooth surfaces by insects: a review [J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 1993, 13 (1):3-7.
[2]  Nelson D R, Adams T S, Fatland C L. Hydrocarbons in the surface wax of eggs and adults of the colorado potato beetle, <em>Leptinotarsa decemlineata</em> [J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B, 2003, 134:447-466.
[3]  陈少华, 苏爱嘉. 生物黏附与仿生黏附力学的进展 [J]. 力学与实践,2007, 29 (2): 9-17.
[4]  戴振东, 孙久荣. 壁虎的运动及仿生研究进展 [J]. 自然科学进展,2006, 16 (5): 519-523.</p>
[5]  Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair [J]. Nature, 2000, 405:681-685.
[6]  Beutel R G, Gorb S N. Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny [J]. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 2001, 39:177-207.
[7]  Bullock J M R, Federle W. Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae [J]. Naturwissenschaften, 2011, 98 (5):381-387.
[8]  Liu Z, Liang A P. Ultrastructure of the tarsus in <em>Oides decempunctatus</em> (Billberg) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) [J]. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 2013, 86(2):122-132.
[9]  张学书, 梁爱萍. 三种蝇类昆虫(双翅目)足爪垫结构的超微形态研究 [J]. 动物分类学报. 2012, 37 (4): 694-700.
[10]  Weirauch C. Hairy attachment structures in Reduviidae (Cimicomorpha, Heteroptera), with observations on the fossula spongiosa in some other Cimicomorpha [J]. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 2007, 246:155-175.
[11]  Betz O. Structure of the tarsi in some <em>Stenus</em> species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae): external morphology, ultrastructure, and tarsal secretion [J]. Journal of Morphology, 2003, 255 (1):24-43.
[12]  Langer M G, Ruppersberg J P, Gorb S. Adhesion forces measured at the level of a terminal plate of the fly's seta [J]. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London Series B, 2004, 271(1554):2 209-2 215.
[13]  <p> Vogel M J, Steen P H. Capillarity-based switchable adhesion [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2010, 107(8): 3 377-3 381.
[14]  Stork N E. A scanning electron microscope study of tarsal adhesive setae in the Coleoptera [J]. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1980, 68:173-306.
[15]  Hanna G, Barnes W J P. Adhesion and detachment of the toe pads of tree frogs [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1991, 155: 103-125.
[16]  Gorb S, Scherge M. Biological microtribology: anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material [J]. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London Series B, 2000, 267 (1449):1 239-1 244.
[17]  Gorb S, Jiao Y, Scherge M. Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in <em>Tettigonia viridissima</em> (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae) [J]. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2000, 186 (9):821-831.
[18]  Federle W. Why are so many adhesive pads hairy?[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209 (14):2611-2621.
[19]  Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang Y A, et al. Evidence for van der waals adhesion in gecko setae [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2002, 99:12 252-12 256.
[20]  Autumn K, Dittmore A, Santos D, et al. Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209:3 569-3 579.
[21]  Geiselhardt S F, Lamm S, Gack C, et al. Interaction of liquid epicuticular hydrocarbons and tarsal adhesive secretion in <em>Leptinotarsa decemlineata</em> Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) [J]. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2010, 196:369-378.
[22]  Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R. From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2003, 100 (29):10 603-10 606.
[23]  Edwards J S. Observations on the development and predatory habit of two reduviid Heteroptera, <em>Rhinocoris carmelita</em> Stal and <em>Platymeris rhadamanthus</em> Gerst [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London A, 1962, 37: 89-98.
[24]  Bullock J M R, Federle W. The effect of surface roughness on claw and adhesive hair performance in the dock beetle <em>Gastrophysa viridula</em> [J]. Insect Science, 2011, 18:298-304.
[25]  Federle W, Riehle M, Curtis A S G, et al. An integrative study of insect adhesion: mechanics and wet adhesion of pretarsal pads in ants [J]. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2002, 42:1 100-1 106.
[26]  Dirks J H, Clemente C J, Federle W. Insect tricks: two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping [J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2010, 7:587-593.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133