|
- 2018
禁山与赭山:秦始皇的多重面相
|
Abstract:
摘要 最近公布的岳麓书院藏秦简有一篇“秦始皇禁湘山诏”,内容涉及秦始皇巡游湘山时,因喜爱湘山一带树木“野美”而将湘山列入禁苑,归属苍梧郡管辖,文中的湘山应指今洞庭君山,屏山即今洞庭扁山,骆翠山则当巴丘山,由此判定秦苍梧郡北境当有今洞庭湖大部地区。与此迵然不同的是,《史记》记载了秦始皇伐湘山树并赭其山。分析表明,司马迁的历史叙事也有其合理性,它反映的是另一种“文本历史”,是被征服的东方地区民众的集体记忆。
Abstract:There is an imperial edict called “Qin Shihuang enclosing the Xiangshan Mountain”in the bamboo slips recently published by the Yuelu Academy. According to the bamboo ships, because of his love for the wild and beautiful trees in the Xiangshan area which belonged to the Cangwu Commandery, Qin Shihuang listed the Xiangshan Mountain into a restricted area. The Xiangshan Mountain in the bamboo ships should be referred to today’s Jun Mountain, the Pingshan Mountain is the present Dongtingbian Mountain, and the Luocui Mountain is the Bakushan Mountain. Therefore, it is determined that most of the Dongting Lake is located in the northern part of Qin Cangwu Commandery. Differnently, from the historical account of Shiji(Historical Records), Qin Shihuang fall trees on the hills and the Xiangshan Mountain became cutover. Analysis shows that Sima Qian’s historical narrative has its rationality, reflecting another “text history”, which is the collective memory of the conquered eastern region.