郭象《庄子注》诠释方法论新探
The New Research on the Interpretation Methodology of Guo Xiang’s Chuang Tzu’s Note

摘要 由于学术界存在某些误解，以为“寄言出意”是郭象注释《庄子》的“根本方法”，是郭象齐一儒道、调和“自然”与“名教”、建立其哲学体系的“根本方法”，故而笔者追随诸位学者之后进行郭象《庄子注》诠释方法论新探，尝试提出并论证郭象《庄子注》创建的三种主要诠释方法论：一、要其会归而遗其所寄，即透过“寄言”以发掘出作者所要表达的真意；二、顺其章法以探微索隐，即紧扣文本以分析章法而层层解说、层层推理；三、参与论辩以阐发义理，即诠释者本人参与经典文本所表述的论辩场面以阐发义理。本文认为，以上三种诠释方法互动互补而自成系统，才是郭象《庄子注》诠释方法论的本质特征和独特风格。
Abstract：Considering there are some misunderstanding in academia that taking “reposing the words to express meaning” as the radical method of Guo Xiang’s annotation on Chuang Tzu， also regarding it as the radical method of unifying Confucianism and Taoism，reconciling “nature” and “the Confucian ethical code”，and establishing philosophy system，this paper follows those scholars to start a new research to propose and demonstrate three kinds of main interpretation methodology of Guo Xiang’s Chuang Tzu’s Note： The first of all，Guo Xiang mentioned that achieving the spiritual essence and ignoring the expression method，namely finding the true meaning expressed by original author by “reposing the words”. Secondly，he specifically analyzed the art of the composition of the text，explaining and inferring step by step. Thirdly，Guo Xiang maintained that the interpreters should participate in the argument of the classical text to explicate the art of the composition. This paper holds the opinion that all the three kinds of interpretation methodology are mutually complementary as well as independent of each other，which is also the essential characteristics and uniqueness of Guo Xiang’s Chuang Tzu’s Note.