全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2016 

非主观值训练的盲视频质量评价算法
Blind Video Quality Assessment Strategy Without Subjective Scores Training

DOI: 10.11784/tdxbz201407023

Keywords: 视频质量,无参评价,高斯差分滤波,质量感知聚类,运动矢量
video quality
,no-reference assessment,ifference of Gaussian (DoG)filter,quality-aware clustering,motion vector

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

针对现有基于机器学习的无参考视频质量评价方法中需要利用大量主观评价分值进行训练,导致复杂度高的问题,提出一种非主观值训练的盲视频质量评价算法.首先,利用高斯差分滤波器提取视频结构特征矢量,通过计算与质量感知中心的距离,来评估视频空域感知质量;然后,利用聚类算法获取对运动矢量进行分类的阈值,进而得到运动感知因子;最后,结合视频空域感知质量和运动加权因子得到视频客观质量.实验结果表明:该算法在LIVE video quality 数据库中对视频质量预测的单调性和精确性分别达到了0.817,7和0.828,5,优于对比的其他盲视频质量评价算法;同时,该算法计算复杂度低,易于实现.
Existing no-reference video quality assessment methods based on machine learning needed to use a lot of subjective scores for training which leads to high complexity,thus a blind video quality assessment strategy without subjective scores training was proposed in this paper. Firstly,video structure characteristic vector extracted by the difference of Gaussian (DoG)filter,and the video space perceived quality was estimated by calculating the distance between the structure vector and the quality-aware center. Secondly,the classification threshold of motion vector was obtained by clustering algorithm,and the motion perception factor was acquired. Finally,the video objective quality the video space perception quality and the motion perception factor. The proposed algorithm was tested on the LIVE video quality database. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm,which possesses a monotonicity and a prediction accuracy of up to 0.817,7 and 0.828,5,respectively,is better than other existing blind video quality assessment methods,and that it is easy to implement because of low computational complexity

References

[1]  .Moorthy A K,Bovik A C. A two-step framework for constructing blind image quality indices[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters,2010,17(5):513-516.
[2]  .Seshadrinathan K,Soundararajan R,Bovik A C,A subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms[C]//SPIE Proceedings Human Vision and Electronic Imaging. San Jose,USA2010:1-10.
[3]  .Saad M A,Bovik A C,Charrier C. Blind prediction of natural video quality[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2014,23(3):1352-1365.
[4]  .He Lihuo,Tao Dacheng,Gao Xinbo. Sparse representation for blind image quality assessment[C]// 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Providence,USA,2012:1146-1153.
[5]  .Mittal A,Muralidhar G,Ghosh J,et al. Blind image quality assessment without human training using latent quality factors[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters,2012,19(2):75-78.
[6]  .Mittal A,Soundararajan R,Bovik A C. Making a ‘completely blind’ image quality analyzer[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters,2013,21(3):209-212.
[7]  .Seeling P,Reisslein M. Video transport evaluation with H. 264 video traces[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials,2012,14(4):1142-1165.
[8]  .Zhang Lin,Zhang Lei,Mou Xuanqin,et al. FSIM: feature similarity index for image quality assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2011,20 (8):2378-2386.
[9]  .Xue Wufeng,Zhang Lei,Mou Xuanqin. Learning without human scores for blind image quality assessment [C]//2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Portland,USA,2013:995-1002.
[10]  .Seshadrinathan K,Bovik A C. Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2010,19(2):335-350.
[11]  .Sheikh H R,Sabir M F,Bovik A C. A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2006,15(11):3440-3451.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133