|
- 2017
基于静态与动态神经网络的运河水位预报
|
Abstract:
以杭州市上塘河运河为例, 分别建立自回归、静态时延神经网络及动态反馈神经网络模型预报受闸门及泵站影响的城市河道未来1~3 h的水位变化, 并对模型预报误差、不同水位区间下的误差-频数关系及训练数据的不确定性进行分析.研究结果表明:在预见期1~3 h内, 时延神经网络预报效率系数均达到0.9以上, 比自回归模型分别提高1.34% 、5.57% 和6.86% , 比动态反馈网络分别提高0.21% 、1.97% 和1.98% ; 动态网络模型在人为调控的影响下仍能通过训练模拟出降雨径流关系, 对数据具有更好的自学习与调适能力; 时延神经网络模型随数据减少预测精度也减少, 在仅保留1个洪水场次下效率系数最大降低8.05% , 而动态反馈网络效率系数随训练数据量变化基本在0.11% 内波动, 因此在数据量较少的情况下宜建构动态模型.
The auto-regression(AR)model,static time-delay neural network(TDNN)and dynamic recurrent neural network(RNN)models were constructed for 1―3 h ahead water level forecasting at the complex Shangtang Canal system where water level was affected by sluices and pumping stations. Analyses were conducted of the forecast bias and error-frequency relationship at different water levels,as well as the uncertainty of training data. The results indicated that: the coefficient of efficiency obtained from TDNN was higher than 0.9,which resulted in 1.34% ,5.57% and 6.86% improvements as compared to AR,and is 0.21% ,1.97% and 1.98% improvements as compared to RNN for 1―3 h forecasting; the RNN model could still be trained to simulate the rainfall-runoff relationship even though the training data contained man-made noise,indicating that the RNN model is capable of self-learning and adaptability; the accuracy of TDNN model,based on a single flood event,was 8.05% lower than the original performance as the training size decreased in terms of coefficient of efficiency,whereas the forecasted error obtained from RNN model was basically within 0.11% with training size changing. Therefore,it is suggested to adopt RNN model in the case of insufficient training data
[1] | Tiwari M K, Chatterjee C. Uncertainty assessment and ensemble flood forecasting using bootstrap based artificial neural networks(BANNs)[J]. <i>Journal of Hydrology</i>, 2010, 382:20-33. |
[2] | Seibert J. On the need for benchmarks in hydrological modelling[J]. <i>Hydrological Processes</i>, 2001, 15:1063-1064. |
[3] | Yu P, Wang Y. Impact of climate change on hydrological processes over a basin scale in northern Taiwan[J]. <i>Hydrological Process</i>, 2009, 23:3556-3568. |
[4] | Fletcher T D, Andrieu H, Hamel P. Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters:A state of the art [J]. <i>Advances in Water Resources</i>, 2013, 51:261-279. |
[5] | Rezaeianzadeh M, Stein A, Tabari H, et al. Assessment of a conceptual hydrological model and artificial neural networks for daily outflows forecasting[J]. <i>International Journal of Environment Science and Technology</i>, 2013, 10(6):1181-1192. |
[6] | Chiang Y, Chang L, Chang F. Comparision of static-feedforward and dynamic-feedback neural networks for rainfall-runoff modeling[J]. <i>Journal of Hydrology</i>, 2004, 290:297-311. |
[7] | Acuna G, Latrille E, Beal C, et al. Static and dynamic neural network models for estimating biomass concentration during thermophilic lactic acid bacteria batch cultures[J]. <i>Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering</i>, 1998, 85(6):615-622. |
[8] | Marques F D, Souza L, Rebolho D C. Application of time-delay neural and recurrent neural networks for the identification of a hingeless helicopter blade flapping and torsion motions[J]. <i>Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering</i>, 2005, 27(2):97-103. |
[9] | Valipour M, Banihabib M E, Behbahani S M R. Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir[J]. <i>Journal of Hydrology</i>, 2013, 476:433-441. |
[10] | Gaume E, Gosset R. Over-parameterisation, a major obstacle to the use of artificial neural networks in hydrology[J]. <i>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</i>, 2003, 7(5):693-706. |
[11] | 李存军, 邓红霞, 朱兵, 等. BP神经网络预测日径流序列的数据适应性分析[J]. 四川大学学报:工程科学版, 2007, 39(2):25-29. |
[12] | Li Cunjun, Deng Hongxia, Zhu Bing, et al. Data adaptability of BP ANN inprediction of daily flow[J]. <i>Journal of Sichuan University</i>:<i>Engineering Science Edition</i>, 2007, 39(2):25-29(in Chinese). |
[13] | Jun G, Zhou J, Song L, et al. Uncertainty assessment and optimization of hydrological model with the shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm:An application to artificial neural network rainfall-runoff model[J]. <i>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment</i>, 2013, 27:985-1004. |
[14] | Huang Guoru, Bing Xiaofang. Radial basis function-network model for channel flood routing[J]. <i>Journal of Hohai University</i>:<i>Natural Sciences</i>, 2003, 31(6):621-625(in Chinese). |
[15] | 尹熊锐, 张翔, 夏军. 基于聚类分析的人工神经网络洪水预报模型研究[J]. 四川大学学报:工程科学版, 2007, 39(3):34-40. |
[16] | Yin Xiongrui, Zhang Xiang, Xia Jun. Classification-based flood forecasting model using artificial neural networks[J]. <i>Journal of Sichuan University</i>:<i>Engineering Science Edition</i>, 2007, 39(3):34-40(in Chinese). |
[17] | 邵月红, 林炳章, 叶金印, 等. 基于 Elman 动态神经网络的降雨-径流模拟研究[J]. 大气科学学报, 2014, 37(2):223-228. |
[18] | Shao Yuehong, Lin Bingzhang, Ye Jinyin, et al. Application of rainfall-runoff simulation based on Elman recurrent dynamic neural network model[J]. <i>Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences</i>, 2014, 37(2):223-228(in Chinese). |
[19] | 郑毅, 方红卫, 何国建, 等. 基于径向基函数的多闸门控制河流的洪水模拟[J]. 清华大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 48(12):2061-2064. |
[20] | Zheng Yi, Fang Hongwei, He Guojian, et al. Flood simulations using radial basis functions for complex river flows controlled by sluices[J]. <i>Journal of Tsinghua University</i>:<i>Science and Technology</i>, 2008, 48(12):2061-2064(in Chinese). |
[21] | 胡健伟, 周玉良, 金菊良. BP 神经网络洪水预报模型在洪水预报系统中的应用[J]. 水文, 2015, 35(1):20-25. |
[22] | G?kbulak F, ?eng?nül K, Serengil Y, et al. Comparison of rainfall-runoff relationship modeling using different methods in a forested watershed[J]. <i>Water Resource Manage</i>, 2015, 29:4229-4239. |
[23] | Sivakumar B. Global climate change and its impacts on water resources planning and management:Assessment and challenges[J]. <i>Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment</i>, 2011, 25(4):583-600. |
[24] | 张建云, 宋晓猛, 王国庆, 等. 变化环境下城市水文学的发展与挑战(Ⅰ):城市水文效应[J]. 水科学进展, 2014, 25(4):594-605. |
[25] | Zhang Jianyun, Song Xiaomeng, Wang Guoqing, et al. Development and challenges of urban hydrology in a changing environment(Ⅰ):Hydrological response to urbanization[J]. <i>Advances in Water Science</i>, 2014, 25(4):594-605(in Chinese). |
[26] | 宋晓猛, 张建云, 王国庆, 等. 变化环境下城市水文学的发展与挑战(Ⅱ):城市雨洪模拟与管理[J]. 水科学进展, 2014, 25(5):752-764. |
[27] | Song Xiaomeng, Zhang Jianyun, Wang Guoqing, et al. Development and challenges of urban hydrology in a changing environment(Ⅱ):Urban storm water modeling and management[J]. <i>Advances in Water Science</i>, 2014, 25(5):752-764(in Chinese). |
[28] | 周秀平, 王文圣, 张学成. 水利水保措施对流域洪水的影响[J]. 四川大学学报:工程科学版, 2011, 43(6):9-14. |
[29] | Zhou Xiuping, Wang Wensheng, Zhang Xuecheng. Impacts of water conservancy measures on flood[J]. <i>Journal of Sichuan University</i>:<i>Engineering Science Edition</i>, 2011, 43(6):9-14(in Chinese). |
[30] | Mekanik F, Imteaz M A, Gato-Trinidad S, et al. Multiple regression and artificial neural network for long-term rainfall forecasting using large scale climate modes [J]. <i>Journal of Hydrology</i>, 2013, 503:11-21. |
[31] | Liu D, Chen X, Lian Y, et al. Impacts of climate change and human activities on surface runoff in the Dongjiang River Basin of China[J]. <i>Hydrological Process</i>, 2010, 24(11):1487-1495. |
[32] | Kim S E, Seo I W. Artificial neural network ensemble modeling with exploratory factor analysis for streamflow forecasting[J]. <i>Journal of Hydroinformatics</i>, 2015, 17(4):614-639. |
[33] | 黄国如, ?u孝芳. 河道洪水演算的径向基函数神经网络模型[J]. 河海大学学报:自然科学版, 2003, 31(6):621-625. |
[34] | Hu Jianwei, Zhou Yuliang, Jin Juliang. Flood forecasting model on BP neural networks and its application in flood forecasting systems[J]. <i>Journal of China Hydrology</i>, 2015, 35(1):20-25(in Chinese). |