教授治学与教授治校：一个似是而非的争论
Academic Governance by Professors and Administrative Governance by Professors: A Paradoxical Controversy

教授治学与教授治校在中国作为备受争议的一对学术 概念，既存在差异又相互联系。治学与治校的合法性来源不 同，治学表示学术事务的治理权，是一种知识权力；而治校则 指向学术组织的治理权，是一种组织权力，二者产生关联起源 于学术活动的组织化。治学与治校并不存在严格的二分，学校 事务以学术事务为核心，学术治理离不开学校治理的支持，教 授治学与治校本身是一个连续体，而不是对立面。无论是教授 治学还是治校，其核心都是对中国大学内部治理模式的探索， 旨在重建以学术权力为核心的制度框架和组织结构。
Academic governance by professors and administrative governance by professors have been a couple of controversial concepts for a long time in China. There are similarities as well as disparities between the two concepts. Academic governance and administrative governance have different legitimate sources in that the former is the governance power on knowledge while the latter is the governance power on organization, which began to connect with each other since the systematization of academic activities. There is no absolute distinction between academic governance and administrative governance which, in essence, are continuums rather than opposites for the fact that both of them are indispensable to each other. Regardless of literal debate, both of the two concepts are the exploration of inner governance structure for China’s universities, aiming to rebuild an institutional framework and organizational structure that operates on the logic of academic power.