明末清初相反对立的阳明学派史——周汝登《圣学宗传》与黄宗羲《明儒学案》的比较
On the Conflicting Views about the History of Wang Yang-ming School in Late Ming Dynasty and Early Qing Dynasty:Comparison Between Sheng-Xue-Zong-Zhuan and Ming-Ru-Xue-An

回顾近代以后的阳明学研究史可以看到，阳明学派的研究一般以黃宗羲《明儒学案》为出发点，以尊重有善有恶说的修证派为阳明学的正统,以尊重善恶说的左派为异端。但是，如果根据周汝登《圣学宗传》可以看出，明末的状況是在阳明学派中，左派是主流，修证派是相似朱子学的保守派。《圣学宗传》代表明末万历末年的阳明学观，《明儒学案》代表清初康熙间阳明学观，二者都应该被尊重。
When we look back on the history of the study of Wang Yang-ming school after modern times;the starting point of the study on Wang Yang-ming school is Huang Zong-xi’s “Ming-Ru-Xue-An”, a large number of scholars assume Yang-ming school’s scholars who put emphasis on ascetic practice and respect the doctrine of “You-Shan You-E” to be the orthodox Yang-ming school, the radical scholars who respect the doctrine of “Wu-Shan Wu-E” to be the heretical school．However, if it depends on Zhou Ru-deng’s “Sheng-Xue-Zong-Zhuan”,in the situation of the late Ming period,we can consider the radical school as the mainstream, the conservatives look like the Zhu-xi school, “Sheng-Xue-Zong-Zhuan” represents the view on Wang Yang-ming school in the Wan-li period of late Ming Dynasty, “Ming-Ru-Xue-An” represent the view on Wang Yang-ming school in the Kang-xi period of the early Qing Dynasty, both views should be respected.