全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2016 

环境规制、引致性研发与企业全要素生产率 ――对“波特假说”的再检验
Environmental Regulation, Induced R&D and Firms′ TFP ―Porter Hypothesis Reexamined

DOI: 10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.201602002

Keywords: 环境规制,引致性研发,全要素生产率,波特假说,污染强度,企业所有制
environmental regulation
,induced R&,D,Total Factor Productivity(TFP),Porter Hypothesis,pollution emission intensity,firm,ownership

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

以中国规模以上工业企业数据为研究样本,分三个层次检验了“波特假说”的存在。首先运用Tobit模型检验了环境规制与企业研发之间的关系,在此基础上考察了由环境规制引致的研发对企业全要素生产率的影响,最后检验了环境规制对企业全要素生产率的影响。结果表明:环境规制促进了企业研发,而且这种由环境规制引致的企业研发显著促进了企业生产率的提升,对环境规制与企业生产率关系的检验进一步验证了“波特假说”的存在;另外,环境规制对企业研发的影响因污染强度和所有制不同存在明显差别。
We divide three sections to test the existence of Porter Hypothesis by using China′s industrial enterprises above designated size data.First, we test the relationship between environmental regulation and R&D by using Tobit model, and on this basis we calculate the induced R&D caused by environmental regulation, then analyze the effect caused by the induced R&D to the TFP.Finally, we test the influence of environmental regulation on TFP.The results show that environmental regulation promotes firms′ R&D, and this induced R&D significantly promotes firms′TFP, so the relationship between environmental and firms′ TFP confirmes the existence of Porter Hypothesis.In addition, the effect of environmental regulation on firms′ R&D varies with the firms′ pollution emission intensity and the firms′ ownership types

References

[1]  [1]CHRISTIANSEN G B, HAVEMAN R H.The Contribution of Environmental Regulations to the Slowdown in Productivity Growth[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1981, 8:381-390.
[2]  [6]JAFFE A B, PETERSON S R, PORTNEY P R, et al.Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing:What Does the Evidence Tell Us[J].Journal of  Economic Literature, 1995, 33:132-163.
[3]  [7]PALMER K W, PORTNEY P.Tightening Environmental Standards:The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9:119-132.
[4]  [8]李玲, 陶锋.中国制造业最优环境规制强度的选择:基于绿色全要素生产率的视角[J].中国工业经济, 2012 (5):70-82.
[5]  [10]毛其淋, 盛斌.中国制造业企业的进入退出与生产率动态演化[J].经济研究, 2013(4):48-68.
[6]  [11]BRAGA H, WILLMORE L.Technological Imports and Technological Effort:an Analysis of Their Determinants in Brazilian firms[J].Journal of Industrial Economics, 1991, 39:278-293.
[7]  [13]CAI H B, LIU Q.Competition and Corporate Tax Avoidance:Evidence from Chinese Industrial Firms[J].Economic Journal, 2009, 119:764-795.
[8]  [14]傅京燕, 李丽莎.环境规制,要素禀赋与产业国际竞争力[J].管理世界, 2010 (10):87-98.
[9]  [3]BECHER R A.Local Environmental Regulation and Plant-level Productivity[J].Ecological Economics, 2011, 70:2516-2522.
[10]  [4]PORTER M E, Van der LINDE C.Toward A New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9:97-118.
[11]  [5]李小平, 卢现祥, 陶小琴.环境规制强度是否影响了中国工业行业的贸易比较优势[J].世界经济, 2012(4):62-78.
[12]  [9]王杰, 刘斌.环境规制与中国企业全要素生产率:基于中国工业企业数据的经验分析[J].中国工业经济, 2014(3):44-56.
[13]  [12]YANG C H, TSENG Y H, CHEN C P.Environmental Regulations, Induced R&D, and Productivity:Evidence from Taiwan′s Manufacturing Industries[J].Resource and Energy Economics, 2012, 34:514-532.
[14]  [2]GRAY W B, SHADBEGIAN R.Environmental Regulation and Manufacturing Productivity at the Plant Level[R].NBER Working Paper, 1993, No.4321.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133