|
|
- 2016
基于扎根理论的企业战略活动执行路径
|
Abstract:
基于扎根理论探索了企业战略活动执行路径，研究结果表明战略活动执行过程分为营造流程再造战略氛围、以能动致变演化机制为主探索和确立战略活动及其解决方式、以优化设计控制机制为主形成战略活动解决规则三个阶段，并且这三个阶段不是严格地按照线性顺序进行，而是根据任务不确定程度的不同，通过双机制之间的相互转化和匹配，使战略活动在第二和第三阶段的交替下螺旋推进。
This paper explores the execution path of strategic activity based on the grounded theory. The results show that strategic activity implementation process can be divided into three stages-the process creation and reconstruction of strategic atmosphere, the exploration and establishment of strategic activity and its solving way based on the evolutionary mechanism of change resulting from activism, and the formation of solving rules of strategic activity based on the optimization design control mechanism. The three stages change with the uncertainty of the tasks without strictly following the linear order, and promote the strategic activity substituting spirally in the second and third stages through the mutual transformation and matching of the dual-mechanism
| [1] | ［1］IBM全球企业咨询服务部.2010年IBM全球CEO调研：中国洞察［EB/OL］.［2015-11-15］. <a href="http://www-935.ibm.com/services/multimedia/2010_ceo_study.pdf">http://www-935.ibm.com/services/multimedia/2010_ceo_study.pdf</a>. |
| [2] | ［6］ISABELLA L A.Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 1990(1):7-41. |
| [3] | ［8］WITHEY M，COOPER W H.Measures of Perrow′s Work Unit Technology:An Empirical Assessment and a New Scale［J］.The Academy of Management Journal,1983(1):45-63. |
| [4] | ［3］张笑峰,席酉民,张晓军.本土领导者在应对不确定性中的作用:基于王石案例的扎根分析［J］. 管理学报,2015(2):178-186. |
| [5] | ［14］文东华,潘飞,陈世敏.环境不确定性，二元管理控制系统与企业业绩实证研究：基于权变理论的视角［J］.管理世界,2009(10):102-114. |
| [6] | ［17］MORSE J M.Designing funded qualitative research［M］//DENZIN N K,LINCOLN Y S.Handbook of qualitative research.London:Sage Publications,1994:220-235. |
| [7] | ［21］DENZIN N K.The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods［M］.New York:McGraw Hill,1978:297-313. |
| [8] | ［2］普华永道变革整合小组．管理悖论:高绩效公司的管理革新［M］．徐京悦, 杨力，译．北京:经济日报出版社，2002:1． |
| [9] | ［4］柳士顺．企业管理者的执行力研究［D］．广州：暨南大学，2007． |
| [10] | ［5］韦华宁.中国企业战略执行现状研究［J］.商业经济与管理,2005(2):29-33. |
| [11] | ［10］VEN V D A H,DELBECQ A L,KOENIG R.Determinants of coordination modes within organizations［J］.American Sociological Review,1976(2):322-338. |
| [12] | ［11］ARGOTE L.Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units［J］.Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982(3):420-434. |
| [13] | ［16］THOMPSON J D.Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory［M］.New York:Transaction Pub,2003:1-3. |
| [14] | ［19］费小冬.扎根理论研究方法论:要素,研究程序和评判标准［J］.公共行政评论,2008(3):23-43. |
| [15] | ［20］GLASER B G.The Grounded Theory Perspective:Conceptualisation Contrasted with Description［M］.Mill Valley, CA:The Sociology Press,2001:145. |
| [16] | ［22］MACRD M,TAGLIAVENTI M R,BERTOLOTTI F.A grounded theory for resistance to change in a small organization［J］.Journal of Organizational Change Management,2002(3):292-310. |
| [17] | ［23］徐宗国．质性研究概论［M］．台北：巨流出版社，1997:165． |
| [18] | ［24］PANDIT N R.The creation of theory: A recent application of the grounded theory method［J］.The Qualitative Report,1996(4):1-13. |
| [19] | ［25］DUNPHY D,STACE D.The strategic management of corporate change［J］.Human Relations，1993(8)：905-920. |
| [20] | ［7］PERROW C.A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations［J］.American Sociological Review, 1967(2):194-208. |
| [21] | ［9］马续补,郭菊娥.任务不确定程度的属性测度方法［J］.统计与决策,2010(12):4-6. |
| [22] | ［12］KIM J, BURTON R M.The effect of task uncertainty and decentralization on project team performance［J］.Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory,2002(4):365-384. |
| [23] | ［13］吉利,毛洪涛,王子亮，等.任务不确定性对管理控制系统的影响及其作用机理：基于在中国国有大型铁路施工企业的实地研究［J］.会计研究,2011(4):52-60. |
| [24] | ［15］WEICK K E.The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Man Gulch Disaster［J］.Administrative Science Quarterly,1993(4):628-652. |
| [25] | ［18］SUDDABY R.From the editors: What grounded theory is not［J］.The Academy of Management Journal,2006(4):633-642. |
