|
- 2015
机构持股、投资决策与高管薪酬 ――基于经理人职业声誉模型的理论分析
|
Abstract:
机构投资者持股对公司治理的积极作用已经得到广泛认可,然而传统观点认为增加机构持股比例会抑制公司投资、降低高管薪酬,这与近期实证研究发现的证据存在矛盾。为此构建了基于经理人职业声誉顾虑的理论模型,试图为相关实证结果提供合理的解释。研究表明,机构持股比例越高,越能增强机构投资者监督、了解经理人经营能力的意愿,从而确保高能力经理人不会因偶然投资失败而面临声誉风险,这就增大了高能力经理人为公司投资创利的可能性,同时也使经理人能够获得与自身经营能力相适应的薪酬回报。
Institutional investors holding an active role in corporate governance has been widely recognized, but the traditional view that increases in the proportion of institutional ownership will inhibit investment and reduce executive compensation, which contradicts the evidence of recent empirical researches. In this paper, a theoretical model was constructed based on the manager′s career concerns, trying to provide a reasonable explanation for the relevant empirical results. Studies have shown that the higher the proportion of institutional ownership, the more investors′ willing to supervise the managers, ensuring high capability managers will not fail due to accidental reputational risk. Therefore, managers will have a greater possibility to make profitable investment, while be able to get rewards according to their capability
[1] | [4]COUGHLAN A,SCHMIDT R.Executive compensation,management turnover,andfirm performance:An empirical investigation[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,1985,7(1-3):43-66. |
[2] | [5]KAPLAN S,MINTON B.Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards:Determinants and implications for managers[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1994,36(2):225-257. |
[3] | [6]AGHIONP,REENEN J V,ZINGALESL.Innovation and institutional ownership[J].American Economic Review,2013,103(1):277-304. |
[4] | [7]王斌,解维敏,曾楚宏.机构持股,公司治理与上市公司R&D投入:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策,2011(6):78-82. |
[5] | [9]毛磊,王宗军,王玲玲.机构投资者与高管薪酬:中国上市公司研究[J].管理科学,2011(5):99-110. |
[6] | [10]刘轶,王折学,刘银.商业银行高管薪酬,薪酬差距与绩效[J].湖南大学学报:社会科学版,2013(5):78-83. |
[7] | [11]汪异明,高道德,李明亮,等.推动长期资金入市,培育长期投资者[R].上证联合计划课题报告,2013(23). |
[8] | [12]WAHALS,MCCONNEL J.Do institutional investors exacerbate managerial myopia?[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2000,6(3):307-329. |
[9] | [13]范海峰,胡玉明.机构投资者持股与公司研发支出:基于中国证券市场的理论与实证研究[J].南方经济,2012(9):60-69. |
[10] | [17]南晓莉,刘井建.机构投资者持股特征对IPOs长期绩效影响的实证研究[J].华东经济管理,2014(10):37-42. |
[11] | [18]计方,刘星.机构投资者持股对企业非效率投资行为的治理效应[J].财政研究,2011(3):69-72. |
[12] | [19]张敏,姜付秀.机构投资者,企业产权与薪酬契约[J].世界经济,2010(8):43-58. |
[13] | [20]HOLMSTROM B.Managerial incentive problems:A dynamic perspective[J].Review of Economic Studies,1999,66 (226):169-182. |
[14] | [1]SHLEIFER A,VISHNY R W.A survey of corporate governance[J].Journal of Finance,1997,52(2):737-783. |
[15] | [3]STEIN J.Efficient capital markets,inefficient firms:A model of myopic corporatebehavior[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1989,104(4):655-669. |
[16] | [14]黄谦.中国证券市场机构投资者与上市公司盈余管理关联性的研究[J].当代经济科学,2009(4):108-115. |
[17] | [15]王雪荣,董威.中国上市公司机构投资者对公司绩效影响的实证分析[J].中国管理科学,2009(1) :15-20. |
[18] | [16]袁蓉丽,肖泽忠,邹宏.金融机构投资者的持股和公司业绩:基于股东积极主义的视角[J].中国软科学,2010(11):110-122. |
[19] | [22]GIBBONS R,MURPHYK J.Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns:Theory and evidence[J].Journal of Political Economy,1992,100(3):468-505. |
[20] | [2]YAFEH Y,YOSHA O.Large shareholders and banks:Who monitors and how?[J].Economic Journal,2003,113(484):128-146. |
[21] | [8]HARTZELL J C,STARKS L T.Institutional investors andexecutive compensation [J].Journal of Finance,2003,58(6):2351-2374. |
[22] | [21]XU M.CEO employment contract horizon and myopic behavior【R】.NBERWorking Paper,2009. |
[23] | [23]MANSO G.Motivating Innovation[J].Journal of Finance,2011,66 (5):1823-1860. |
[24] | [24]EDMANS A.Blockholder trading,market efficiency,and managerial myopia[J].Journal ofFinance,2009,64 (6):2481-2513. |