|
- 2016
审判中心主义语境下的证人弹劾规则
|
Abstract:
以审判为中心对现行诉讼制度进行改革,要求一切诉讼活动都要以审判为中心展开,控辩审三方职能的行使都要围绕审判展开,实现庭审实质化。庭审实质化需贯彻直接言词原则,要求将证据裁判原则深入到庭审过程尤其是认定被告人有罪的过程中,而证人和鉴定人出庭便是落实庭审实质化的重要前提。随着审判中心诉讼改革的加深,有效利用出庭证人和鉴定人在庭审中的证言,保证被告人的辩护权得到充分有效的行使,是谈审判中心改革的重要内容。美国证据法的证人弹劾规则中有部分内容不仅有利于庭审双方形成良性的对抗态势,更有助于对事实认定者证人证言的可信性进行判断,促进事实认定的准确性。
The reformation of criminal procedure in trial-centeredness has been posed by the Resolution of the Forth Plenum of CPC. Firstly, the trial should be the center of the entire criminal procedure system. Secondly, the both parties of trial should be controlled by the trial. The most important is substantive of trial. All above including the conviction of defendant should be governed by the principle of direct and verbal & the principle of judgment by means of evidence. The important premise is the attendance of witness and identifier. With the guidance of parts of the rules of impeachment, the situaition of the attendance of witness and identifier will be improved. How to use the testimony and protect the right of defense are important parts of the reformation of criminal procedure in trial-centeredness.Research on the rules of impeachment in Federal Rules of Evidence should be helpful to the both parties in forming a good confrontation situation and to the fact finder in judging the credibility of the testimony
[1] | [7]陈光中.证据裁判原则若干问题之探讨[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2014(6):16-21. |
[2] | [8]陈光中.刑事证据法专家拟制稿(条文、释义与论证)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:127. |
[3] | [11]吴洪淇.审判中心主义背景下的证据裁判原则反思[J].理论视野,2015(4):34-36. |
[4] | [12]陈光中、郑曦.论刑事诉讼中的证据裁判原则――兼谈《刑事诉讼法》修改中的若干问题[J].法学,2011(9):3-12. |
[5] | [15]陈瑞华.法学研究方法的若干反思[J].中外法学,2015(1):22-23. |
[6] | [16]牟绿叶.弹劾证据规则的中国模式――以弹劾侦查人员证言为切入点的分析[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(1):63-73. |
[7] | [19]罗纳德?J?艾伦、理查德?B?库恩斯、埃莉诺?斯威夫特. 证据法――文本、问题和判例[M].张保生,王进喜,赵滢,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2006:147-159. |
[8] | [21]王进喜.美国《联邦证据规则》(2011年重塑版)条解[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2012:170. |
[9] | [2]龙宗智.论建立以一审庭审为中心的事实认定机制[J].中国法学,2010(2):143-157. |
[10] | [9]江伟.中国证据法草案(建议稿)及立法理由书[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:1. |
[11] | [10]张保生.证据法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2015:138. |
[12] | [17]JOHN HENRY WIGMORE. Evidence in Trials at Common Law [M]. James Harmon Chadboum. Columbia Law Review Association,1970:1017. |
[13] | [22]ARTHUR BEST. Evidence, Examples & Explanations [M]. Aspen Publishers, 2012:159. |
[14] | [1]张吉喜.论以审判为中心的诉讼制度[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2015(3):44-52. |
[15] | [3]何家弘.从侦查中心转向审判中心――中国刑事诉讼制度的改良[J].中国高校社会科学,2015(2):129-159. |
[16] | [4]沈德咏.论以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革[J].中国法学,2015(3):5-19. |
[17] | [5]樊崇义.解读“以审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革[J].中国司法,2015(2):22-27. |
[18] | [6]卞建林,倪润.证据裁判原则在我国的确立与贯彻[J].贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(4):137-142. |
[19] | [13]尚华.论质证[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2013:136. |
[20] | [14]JOHN HENRY WIGMORE. A Treatise on the System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law :Including the Statutes and Judicial Decisions of All Jurisdictions of the United States, Volume 2[M]. Ulan Press, 2012:1697. |
[21] | [18]GARRETT L. BERMAN, DOUGLAS J. NARBY, BRIAN L. CUTLER. Effects of Inconsistent Eyewitness Statements on Mock Jurors?? Evaluations of the Eyewitness,Perceptions of Defendant Culpability and Verdicts [J]. Law and Human Behavior, 1995(19):79. |
[22] | [20]RONALD J ALLEN, RICHARD B. Evidence:Text, Cases, and Problems [M]. Aspen Law & Business , 2011:123. |