全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2015 

《左传》叙事视角研究
Research on the Narration Perspective of Zuozhuan

DOI: 10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.201503019

Keywords: 《左传》,中国古代叙事,全知叙事,纯客观叙事,限知叙事
narrative perspective
,omniscient narration,impersonal narration,limited narration

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

《左传》作为中国叙事文学的真正起点和开篇,对于中国叙事结构的形成产生了重要的影响,并引申出如何看待“文史不分”与中国叙事传统的关系问题,以全知叙事、纯客观叙事和限知叙事三个方面对《左传》叙事结构的生成过程进行了辨析;认为《左传》的叙事并非以“文学性”的实现为目的,而是担负“史”的功能,其“文学性”的实现是一种历史的发生,也是一种解释的迁延;同时,在叙事上摒弃了单一的记事或记言的旧制,以“言事相兼”为手段,真正实现了中国历史记叙从账簿似的大事记向以写人物活动的历史叙述的转移,将中国史学记叙推到了一个崭新的阶段;在文史互见的基础上,发见了中国叙事的“由史入文”、“允文允史”的基本特质。
As the beginning of Chinese narrative literature, Zuozhuan has greatinfluence on the formation of Chinese narrative structure, posing the question of how to look upon the relationship between "mixed literature and history" and the Chinese narrative tradition. Based on the three Chinese narrative perspectives, namely omniscient narration, limited narration and impersonal narration, we analyzed the formation of Zuozhuan′s narrative structure and tried to find the basic characteristics of Chinese narration. This thesis holds that Zuozhuan′s narration is not for the purpose of "literariness" but of "history" function. During the realization of its "literariness", it not only describes the occurring of the "history" but also extends the explanation; Meanwhile, its narration abandons the traditional single history-telling method and words-keeping method, however, it adopts "history mixed with words", realizing the transfer from Chinese traditional running account of history-telling to historical narration of characters, pushing the historiography onto a new stage. Hereby, we find the basic essence of Chinese narration, mixture of "literariness" and " history"

References

[1]  [2]谷鹏飞.文本的死亡与作品的复活――“新文本主义”文学观念及其方法意义[J].文学评论,2014(4):36-43.
[2]  [14]朱立元.当代西方文艺理论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1997:245.
[3]  [15]吴家荣,江守义.中西叙事精神之比较[M].合肥:安徽大学出版社,2011:204.
[4]  [17]刘熙载.文概:艺概:卷一[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978:1-2.
[5]  [7]童书业.春秋左传研究[M].北京:中华书局,2006:346.
[6]  [1]兹维坦?托多罗夫.文学作品分析[M]//张寅德.叙述学研究.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1989:65.
[7]  [5]申丹.叙述学与小说文体学研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001:204.
[8]  [12]雷内?韦勒克.批评的概念[M].张今言,译.杭州:中国美术学院出版社,1999:239.
[9]  [13]杨义.中国叙事学[M].北京:人民出版社,1997.
[10]  [3]童庆炳.中国叙事文学的起点与开篇――《左传》叙事艺术论略[J].北京师范大学学报,2006(5):43-48.
[11]  [4]孙绿怡.左传与中国古典小说[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992:75.
[12]  [6]过常宝.《左传》虚饰与史官叙事的理性自觉[J].北京师范大学学报,2006(4):69-76.
[13]  [8]黄扑民.中国军事通史:春秋军事史:卷2[M].北京:军事科学出版社,1998:336.
[14]  [9]梁启超.梁启超全集:要籍解题及其读法:卷16[M].北京:北京出版社,1999:4649.
[15]  [10]钱钟书.管锥编:第1册[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
[16]  [11]郭预衡.中国散文史:第1册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2000.
[17]  [16]杜预.春秋左传集解[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1977:20.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133