全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2015 

政治哲学视野下儒家之“孝”的结构分析 ――以亚里士多德“好公民”与“好人”理论为线索
Structural Analysis of Confucian "Filial Piety" from the Perspective of Political Philosophy ――Guided by Aristotle′s Theories of "Good Citizen" and "Good Man"

Keywords: 政治哲学,儒家,,物质结构,精神结构
Political Philosophy Confucianism
,Filial Piety,Material Structure,Spiritual Structure

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

“孝”价值在儒家文化中具有举足轻重的地位,儒家之“孝”复杂精微、气象万千,大体包含辩证、层级、程序、主体和客体等物质结构,同时循着亚里士多德“好公民”与“好人”理论的思想线索,还可以勘定“孝”的内在精神结构。通过批判性地省察 “孝子”,也就是儒家意义上的好儿子的文化政治身位可以发现,从总体上说,好儿子往往不会是一个好父亲,但却会成为一个好公民并进而成为一个好人。在现代性语境下,无论坚持“祛魅”还是“复魅”立场,对“孝”的整全结构的把握都是其基础和必要的工作。
"Filial piety" plays an important role in Confucian culture,which is complicated and delicate,including the material structures of dialectics,rating,procedure,subject and object in general.Meanwhile,we can explore the internally spiritual structure guided by Aristotle′s theories of "good citizen" and "good man".It could be found that,by critically examining the cultural and political status of "xiaozi" who is good son in the sense of Confucianism,a good son may not to be a good father,but to be a good citizen and then a good man to a certain degree.In the context of modernity,it is the basic and necessary task to understand the holistic structure of "filial piety",no matter what one′s position is "disenchantment" or "enchantment"

References

[1]  [4]Thomas Hobbes.Man and Citizen[M].Bernard Gert,Indianapolis:Hackett Publishing Company,1991.
[2]  [6]郭齐勇.正本清源论中西――对某种中国文化观的病理学剖析[C].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2014.
[3]  [10]柏拉图.柏拉图对话集[M].王太庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[4]  [15]张祥龙.孝意识的时间分析[J].北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2006(1):14-24.
[5]  [16]Thomas Pangle.Aristotle′s Teaching in the Politics[M].Chicago:the University of Chicago Press,2013.
[6]  [17]Thomas Hobbes.Leviathan[M].Edwin Curley,Indianapolis:Hackett Publishing Company,1994.
[7]  [1]See Edward L Rubin.Soul,Self and Society:The New Morality and the Modern State[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2014.
[8]  [7]刘清平.美德还是腐败[J].哲学研究,2002(2):43-47.
[9]  [8]李隆基注,邢?m疏.孝经注疏[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
[10]  [9]赵汀阳.天下主义:世界制度哲学导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[11]  [13]Aristotle.The Politics and The Constitution [M].ed.Stephen Everson,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.
[12]  [14]李涛.亚里士多德的伦理性政治学[J].哲学动态,2012(11):57-64.
[13]  [3]温海明.孔子“孝”非反思先行性之哲学分析[J].社会科学,2012(7):124-131.
[14]  [5]朱熹.四书集注[M].北京:中华书局,2011.
[15]  [11]亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M].廖申白,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[16]  [12]Clifford Angell Bates,Jr.Aristotle′s Best Regime[M].Baton Rouge:Louisiana State University,2003.
[17]  [2]张再林.作为身体哲学的中国古代哲学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133