|
- 2015
美国《孤儿药法案》的变迁及启示 ――基于对中国生物医药产业的研究
|
Abstract:
运用制度理论和现象分析法,探讨了美国《孤儿药法案》形成以及颁布30余年的变迁,重点分析了其立法调整过程以及制度环境对生物医药产业发展的影响;认为其形成和变迁是一个三阶段的社会化过程,与产业组织结构相适应的制度环境能够有效促进产业发展;患者群体、联邦政府和制药企业分别在三个阶段中扮演主导角色,文化-认知性要素、规制性要素和规范性要素分别在三个阶段的变迁中起到推动作用;在结合中国实际的基础上,提出有效促进中国生物医药产业发展的核心是,既要紧抓制度环境建设,完善规制性要素,发挥其对产业发展的法律支柱作用,还要强化文化-认知性要素,夯实其积累基础并提前防范,关注规范性要素,以调控产业良性发展。
Formation and thirty-year institutional change of Orphan Drug Act are discussed using modern institutional theory and phenomenon analysis, with a specific focus on the legislation adjustments and the impact of institutional environment on industry development. Results show that institutional change of Orphan Drug Act is a three-stage societal process and appropriate institutional environments will significantly enhance biopharmaceutical industry development. Critical agents and institutional pillars are different across stages. Patients ,federal government, and enterprises are playing a dominant role in the three stages respectively. Cultural-cognitive, regulative, and normative pillars promote institutional change respectively. Finally, the implication for Chinese biopharmaceutical industry is to continue building appropriate institutional environments. Specifically, Chinese government is urged to improve the regulatory pillar to exert its legislative influence, to strengthen the cultural-cognitive pillar to accumulate more, and to reinforce the normative pillar to achieve benign progress
[1] | [11]U.S. food and drug administration. How to Apply for Orphan DrugDesignation[EB/OL]. [2013-06-12].http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/HowtoapplyforOrphanProductDesignation/ucm365086.htm. |
[2] | [1]U.S. food and drug administration.Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals Database[EB/OL].[2015-03-08]<a href="http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/opdlisting/oopd/index.cfm">http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/opdlisting/oopd/index.cfm</a>. |
[3] | [2]易八贤,王广平,姬海红,等. 美国孤儿药法案 30 年历程与我国新药创新制度体系完善[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2014(10):1107-1114. |
[4] | [3]斯科特.制度与组织――思想观念与物质利益[M]. 姚伟,王黎芳,译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:56-59. |
[5] | [4]HOFFMAN A J. Institutional Evolution and Change:Environmentalism and the US Chemical Industry[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(4):351-371. |
[6] | [5]田志龙, 张泳. 中国电力行业的演变:基于制度理论的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2002(12):69-76. |
[7] | [14]田春英. 解读特色企业――美国健赞公司[J]. 中国医药生物技术, 2010(3):238-239. |
[8] | [6]BERGER P L, LUCKMANN T. The Social Construction of Reality:A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge[M]. New York:Doubleday Anchor, 1966:103-105. |
[9] | [7]GIORGI, A ,GIORGI, B. Qualitative Psychology:A PracticalGuide to Research Methods[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications, 2003:53-80. |
[10] | [12]EVALUATEPHARMA. Orphan Drug Report2014[EB/OL].[2015-04-13].http://info.evaluategroup.com/rs/evaluatepharmaltd/images/2014OD.pdf. |
[11] | [13]WAXMAN H. The Waxman Report:How Congress Really Works [M]. New York:Grand Central Publishing, 2009:110-132. |
[12] | [8]DUNKLE M. 30-year Retrospective:National Organization for Rare Disorders, the Orphan Drug Act, and the Role of Rare Disease Patient Advocacy Groups[J]. Orphan Drugs:Research and Review, 2014(4):19-27. |
[13] | [9]刘炳林. 国外孤儿药政策概述及启示[J]. 中药新药与临床药理, 2002, 13(5):332-333. |
[14] | [10]ORPHANET. About rare diseases.[EB/OL].[2013-11-22].http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/Education_AboutRareDiseases.php?lng=EN. |
[15] | [15]李天柱, 银路, 程跃. 美国领先生物制药企业的成功要素及其启示[J]. 管理学报, 2010, 7(9):1335-1342. |