|
|
- 2016
大科学时代下的科研合作网络
|
Abstract:
科研合作活动已经逐渐成为目前大科学时代下科研界的主流现象，基于对科研合作及其演化的阐析，从科研成果创造主体出发，分别对国家合作网络、机构合作网络和科学家合作网络的结构特征以及创新特点进行了分析，并以管理科学这一新兴学科为例，利用社会网络软件绘制了科研合作网络知识图谱，对大科学时代下的科研合作网络进行了解析，并据此对全球管理科学领域科研合作网的研究方向与合作对象的选择提出了相应的建议。
Cooperative research has gradually become the mainstream of scientific research, the research carried on the thorough analysis about the evolution of the cooperation mechanism. This paper embarks the three basic types of literature creators, builds up three single scientific research cooperation networks such as national cooperation network, institutional cooperation network and scientist collaboration network respectively, the detailed research about the structures characteristics and innovation of the three cooperation networks were carried on. And the emerging interdisciplinary of management science data were taken as example with the social network software UCINet and Netdraw building three cooperation network maps in this paper, and then a thorough analysis of various cooperation networks carried on and the suggestions about our country concreted in the direction of scientific research cooperation and the choice of cooperation partners were put forward
| [1] | ［6］HARANDE Y I. Author productivity and collaboration:an investigation of the relationship using the literature of technology［J］. Libri, 2001, 51(2):124-127. |
| [2] | ［5］NEWMAN M E J. Co-authorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration［J］. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2004, 101(1):5200-5205. |
| [3] | ［9］刘军. 社会网络分析导论［M］. 北京：社会科学文献出版社，2004:122-125. |
| [4] | ［10］金炬,武夷山,梁战平.国际科技合作文献计量学研究综述［J］.图书情报工作，2007(3):63-67. |
| [5] | ［11］NAREN F, WHITLOW E. Measurement of scientific cooperation and co-authorship in CEC-related area of science［R］. Office for official publications of the European Communities. Luxumbourg, Report EUR 12900,1990. |
| [6] | ［12］BASU A, AGGARWAL R. International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance［J］. Scientometrics, 2001, 52(3):379-394. |
| [7] | ［2］DAMPIER W C. A History of Science and its relation with philosophy and religion ［M］. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press, 1985：55-56. |
| [8] | ［8］黄少安, 张苏.人类的合作及其演进研究［J］.中国社会科学，2013(7):77-89. |
| [9] | ［18］田玲,张宏梁,马凌飞. 国内外转化医学发展现状与展望［J］.医学研究杂志，2011(1):17-20. |
| [10] | ［19］YAO Q, LYU P H, MA F C, et al. Global informetric perspective studies on translational medical research［J］. BMC Medical informatics and decision making, 2013, 13(1):1-15. |
| [11] | ［20］康宇航.一种基于共现分析的科技跟踪方法研究［D］. 大连：大连理工大学, 2008. |
| [12] | ［16］NEWMAN M E J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America, 2001, 98(2):404-409. |
| [13] | ［17］谢彩霞.科学计量学领域科学合作研究综述［J］.科学学与科学技术管理，2007(6):5-8. |
| [14] | ［1］习近平.在哲学社会科学工作座谈会上的讲话［EB/OL］.［2016-05-19］. <a href="http://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0519/c64094-28361550.html">http://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0519/c64094-28361550.html</a>. |
| [15] | ［3］BEAVER D，ROSEN R. Studies in Scientific Collaboration:Part 1. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship［J］. Scientometrics, 1978,1(1)：65-84. |
| [16] | ［4］NEWMAN M E J. Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific co-authorship networks ［M］//NEWMAN M E J. Complex networks. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004:337-370. |
| [17] | ［7］PAO M L. Co-authorship as communication measure［J］. Library Research, 1981, 2(4):327-338. |
| [18] | ［13］NARV？BEZ-BERTHELEMOT N. An index to measure the international collaboration of developing countries based on the participation of national institutions:the case of Latin America［J］. Scientometrics, 1995, 34(1):37-44. |
| [19] | ［14］吴杨.团队知识创新过程及其管理研究［D］.哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学, 2009. |
| [20] | ［15］SCHUBERT A, GLANZEL W. Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations［J］. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(2):409-428. |
