全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2017 

政府换届、资本要素错配与经济波动 ――基于中国34个大中型城市的实证研究
Government Transition, Capital Misallocation and Economic Fluctuation: An Empirical Study Based on Data of 34 Large-Medium Cities in China

DOI: 10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.201701004

Keywords: 政府换届,资本要素错配,经济波动
government transition
,capital misallocation,economic fluctuation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

基于中国工业企业微观数据和大中型城市党代会召开时间,分析了政府换届引起经济波动的传导机制。首先构建理论框架,换届冲击通过改变受资源约束型企业与资源充裕型企业之间的资本边际生产率的差异,引起要素在企业之间的流动,进而造成总量全要素生产率的变动,表现为地区的经济波动。此外,经验分析的结果也显示出,要素的错配程度与经济波动之间的确存在稳定的正相关关系;党代会召开后的第二年和第三年,经济波动幅度加剧,且在资本要素错配程度高或市场化程度低的地区更为明显。从而从要素动态配置的微观视角解释了中国经济波动的政治周期特性,为实现“稳增长”的发展目标提供参考。
Using micro-data of Chinese industrial firms and data of convening time of local congress of party representatives in 34 large-medium cities, this paper pays attention on what the transmission mechanism for government transition shock to translate into aggregate economic fluctuation. In our theoretical model, the government transition news shock would trigger capital to flow among enterpreneurs through changing the difference of marginal productivity of capital, furthermore, translating into aggregate TFP fluctuation. In addition, the empirical results show that there is a positive relationship between capital misallocation and economic fluctuation. It also indicates that in the second and third year after the convening of local congress of party representatives, the degree of economic fluctuation would aggravates, especially in areas with high level of capital misallocation and low degree of marketization. The finding is an explanation of political cycle characteristics of China′s economic fluctuation and may provide theoretical support for keeping growth in China

References

[1]  [2]邵军,徐康宁.转型时期经济波动对我国生产率增长的影响研究[J].经济研究,2011(12):97-110.
[2]  [7]蒋伏心,林江.晋升锦标赛,财政周期性与经济波动――中国改革开放以来的经验[J]. 财贸经济,2010(7):44-50.
[3]  [8]梅冬州,王子健,雷文妮.党代会召开,监察力度变化与中国经济波动[J].经济研究,2014(3):47-61.
[4]  [10]周黎安,赵鹰妍,李力雄.资源错配与政治周期[J].金融研究,2013(3):15-29.
[5]  [11]张自然,陆明涛.全要素生产率对中国地区经济增长与波动的影响[J].金融评论,2013(1):7-31.
[6]  [12]林毅夫.新结构经济学:反思经济发展与政策的理论框架[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:117-149.
[7]  [13]HSIEH C T,KLENOW P J. Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009,124(4):1403-1448.
[8]  [15]陈永伟,胡伟民.价格扭曲,要素错配和效率损失:理论和应用[J].经济学(季刊),2011(4):1401-1422.
[9]  [17]MOLL B. Productivity losses from financial frictions:can self-financing undo capital misallocation?[J].American Economic Review,2014,104(10):3186-3221.
[10]  [20]王贤彬,徐现祥.地方官员来源,去向,任期与经济增长――来自中国省长省委书记的证据[J].管理世界,2008(3):16-26.
[11]  [21]陈硕.从治理到制度:央地关系下的中国政治精英选拔[R].复旦大学经济系工作论文,2015.
[12]  [22]杨光,孙浦阳,龚刚. 经济波动,成本约束与资源配置[J].经济研究,2015(2):47-60.
[13]  [23]LEVINSOHN J, PETRIN A. Estimating Production Function Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables[J]. Review of Economic Studies,2003(70):317-341.
[14]  [24]ARELLANO M,BOND S. Some tests of Specification for Panel Data:Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations[J].Review of Economic Studies,1991(2):277-297.
[15]  [4]李斌,王小龙.体制转轨,经济周期与宏观经济运行――中央和地方政府之间博弈模型研究[M]//中国经济周期研究报告.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006:124-145.
[16]  [14]简泽.市场扭曲,跨企业的资源配置与制造业部门的生产率[J]. 中国工业经济,2011(1):1-20.
[17]  [1]刘树成.中国经济波动的新轨迹[J].经济研究,2003(3):3-8.
[18]  [3]刘瑞明,白永秀.晋升激励,宏观调控与经济周期:一个政治经济学框架[J].南开经济研究,2007(5):19-31.
[19]  [5]HIBBS A. Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy[J]. American Political Science Review,1977(4):1467-1487.
[20]  [6]陈卫东,苗文龙.政府换届,经济政策与政治经济周期[J]. 经济经纬,2010(4):14-19.
[21]  [9]聂辉华,王梦琦.政治周期对反腐败的影响――基于2003-2013年中国厅级以上官员腐败案例的证据[J].经济社会体制比较,2014(4):127-140.
[22]  [16]WHALLEY J, ZH S M. A Numerical Simulation Analysis of (Hukou) Labor Mobility Restrictions in China[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2007,83(2):392-410.
[23]  [18]MIDRIGAN V, XU D Y. Finance and Misallocation:Evidence from Plant-Level Data[J].American Economic Review, 2014,104(2):422-458.
[24]  [19]谢攀,龚敏. 矫正要素比价扭曲,资源错配与发展转型[J].求是学刊,2015(1):66-73.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133