|
- 2017
高等教育评估模式的选择:美国的经验及启示
|
Abstract:
通过对美国高等教育选择评估模式时考虑的主要因素的分析,认为美国评估高等教育提供者和学生的基本模式有四种;在选择评估模式时通常需要考虑评估的目的、评估机构的权威性、资源水平、管理的集中化、系统内教育提供者的多样性及系统的复杂性等因素;不同评估模式对于上述因素具有各自不同的适用性;每一种模式都有其优缺点,最好的模式取决于评估的背景。借鉴美国经验,指出中国在选择高等教育评估模式时应综合考虑上述多种因素以及系统内部的有利条件与限制因素,所选的模式应与教育提供者的具体活动、评估者的目的以及提供者与评估者之间的关系等特征相匹配,并且评估需要政府、高校、中介机构、学生家长等多方利益相关者的共同参与。
Based on the analysis of the factors that are most important to consider in deciding on an appropriate model for US assessment, the paper concludes that the assessment approaches of US higher education can be classified into four basic models; there are six main factors to consider in choosing an approach to assessing higher education: purpose of assessment, level of authority, level of resources, centralization of operations, system of heterogeneity, and system of complexity. The applicability to the factors differs from different models. Each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the best approach depends on the context of the assessment. Thus, when an assessor chooses the assessment approach in China, various factors should be taken into account; the constraints and opportunities should both be considered, and the model selected should match well in the provider′s activities, the assessor′s purpose, and the nature of the relationship between the provider and assessor; the stakeholders of assessment should make joint efforts to improve the higher education assessment system
[1] | [5]SUSAN M G,CATHERINE H A,ROGER B, et al. Ensuring Quality and Productivity in Higher Education:An Analysis of Assessment Practices [M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Company, 2002. |
[2] | [1]吴启迪.中国高等教育评估体系的构建与完善[J].教育发展研究,2009(3):38-41. |
[3] | [3]乐美玲,辛涛.高等教育评估的几个关键问题[J].清华大学教育研究,2015(1):48-52. |
[4] | [6]崔瑞锋,田东平.高等教育评估:美国的基本模式[J]. 开放教育研究,2007(4):38-45. |
[5] | [7]EWELL P T. Assessment of higher education and quality:Promise and politics[M]//MESSICK S J. Assessment in higher education:Issues of access, quality, student development, and public policy. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum, 1999:155. |
[6] | [8]STEVENS J, HAMLETT B D. State concerns for learning:Quality and state policy[M]//WARREN J R.Meeting the new demands for standards. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1983:29-38. |
[7] | [9]STEELE J M,LUTZ D A.Report of ACT′s research on postsecondary assessment needs[R].Iowa City, IA:American College Testing,1995. |
[8] | [10]EWELL P T. Assessment:Where are we? The implications of new state mandates [J]. Change, 1987, 19(1):23-28. |
[9] | [11]APER J P, HINKLE D E. State policies for assessing student outcomes:A case study with implications for state and institutional authorities [J]. Journal of Higher Education, 1991, 62:539-555. |
[10] | [12]王战军,乔伟峰,李江波. 数据密集型评估:高等教育监测评估的内涵、方法与展望[J].教育研究,2015(6):29-37. |
[11] | [15]郝孟佳.教育部:评估是国家监控高等教育质量的重要手段[EB/OL]. [2012-04-20]. <a href="http://edu.people.com.cn/GB/8216/36635/17708377.html">http://edu.people.com.cn/GB/8216/36635/17708377.html</a>. |
[12] | [16]中华人民共和国教育部.教育部关于深入推进教育管办评分离促进政府职能转变的若干意见[EB/OL].[2015-05-04].http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s7049/201505/186927.html. |
[13] | [4]顾明远.高等教育评估中几个值得探讨的问题[J].高教发展与评估,2006(3):1-3. |
[14] | [17]马廷奇.大学利益相关者与高等教育评估制度创新[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009(2):116-121. |
[15] | [2]中华人民共和国国务院.国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年) [N].人民日报,2010-07-30(13-15). |
[16] | [13]中国共产党第十八届中央委员会.中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定[EB/OL]. [2013-11-15]. <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2013-11/15/c_118164235.htm">http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2013-11/15/c_118164235.htm</a>. |
[17] | [14]吴岩.高等教育公共治理与“五位一体”评估制度创新[J].中国高教研究,2014(12):14-18. |