全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2016 

内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术的手术技巧及效果分析
Analysis of operative skills and effects of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy

DOI: 10.7652/jdyxb201604028

Keywords: 急性非复杂性阑尾炎,内镜下逆行阑尾造影,内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术(ERAT),内镜治疗,手术技巧
uncomplicated acute appendicitis
,endoscopic retrograde appendicography,endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT),endoscopic therapy,operative skill

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要:目的 研究内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术(ERAT)治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎的手术技巧及手术效果。方法 将2014年10月至2015年1月我院收治的21例拟诊为急性阑尾炎患者纳入研究,急诊行ERAT,分析ERAT手术技巧与治疗效果之间的关系。结果 患者均顺利完成ERAT手术,无1例转外科手术治疗。ERAT平均手术时间为(49.7±18.2)min,患者平均住院时间(3.3±1.6)d。阑尾腔插管作为ERAT最关键的步骤,使用带圈导丝明显缩短插管时间,平均(5.7±4.9)min(P<0.05)。14例患者伴有阑尾粪石(7例块状粪石,4例碎渣样粪石,3例碎渣样粪石伴阑尾腔狭窄),均以取石球囊或网篮成功取出,取石成功率100%。取石网篮取出巨大阑尾粪石并发阑尾穿孔1例,经保守治疗痊愈。放置阑尾支架9例,1周后于门诊行结肠镜取出,均未出现由支架引起的不适或相关并发症。ERAT手术时间随术者手术例数的增多而逐渐缩短。结论 ERAT是一种安全、有效的治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎的内镜治疗方法。选择合适的插管、取石工具,适时放置阑尾支架,增加操作例数等措施将有效地提高手术成功率和安全性。
ABSTRACT: Objective To study the skills and effects of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) in treating patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Methods We enrolled 21 patients with suspected acute appendicitis who then underwent emergent ERAT between October 2014 and January 2015. The data of treatment were collected and the operative skills and effects of ERAT were analyzed. Results ERAT was completed successfully in all the patients, resulting in a success rate of 100%. Mean operation time of ERAT was (49.7±18.2)min and mean hospital stay was (3.3±1.6)d. Cannulation of the appendix lumen was the most critical step of ERAT, and cannulation time [(5.7±4.9)min, P<0.05] was shortened significantly by the use of LoopTip guidewire. Fourteen patients with intraluminal appendicoliths (7 of massive appendicoliths, 4 of sand-like appendicoliths and 3 of sand-like appendicoliths with luminal stenosis) underwent endoscopic lithotomy successfully with balloon or basket, with the success rate of 100%. One patient who presented perforation after appendicolith removal by basket was cured with conservative treatment. Appendix stent was inserted, then pulled out after 1 week in 9 patients, while no complaint or complication of the stent was observed. Operation time of ERAT shortened with the increase of case number. Conclusion ERAT is an effective and safe therapy for treating patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The high success rate and safety of ERAT will be achieved by selecting suitable instruments for cannulation and appendicolith removal, deciding suitable indications for stenting, and accumulating of operative cases

References

[1]  MASAHATA K, UMEMOTO E, KAYAMA H, et al. Generation of colonic IgA-secreting cells in the caecal patch[J]. Nat Commun, 2014, 5(4):643-648.
[2]  VONS C, BARRY C, MAITRE S, et al. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2011, 377(9777):1573-1579.
[3]  VARADHAN KK, HUMES DJ, NEAL KR, et al. Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34(2):199-209.
[4]  STYRUD J, ERIKSSON S, NILSSON I, et al. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. World J Surg, 2006, 30(6):1033-1037.
[5]  LIU K, FOGG L. Use of antibiotics alone for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surgery, 2011, 150(4):673-683.
[6]  LIU BR, SONG JT, HAN FY, et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: a pilot minimally invasive technique[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2012, 76(4):862-866.
[7]  LIU BR, MA X, FENG J, et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT): a multicenter retrospective study in China[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(4):905-909.
[8]  SALMINEN P, PAAJANEN H, RAUTIO T, et al.Antibiotic Therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The APPAC randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA, 2015, 313(23):2340-2348.
[9]  刘冰熔. 内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗技术介绍[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2012, 1(2):96.
[10]  ANSALONI L, CATENA F, COCCOLINI F, et al. Surgery versus conservative antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Dig Surg, 2011, 28 (3):210-221.
[11]  MASON RJ, MOAZZEZ A, SOHN H, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy for acute uncomplicated (no abscess or phlegmon) appendicitis[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2012, 13(2):74-84.
[12]  LEUNG TT, DIXON E, GILL M, et al. Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: what is the true incidence?[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(1):51-53.
[13]  JONES K, PENA AA, DUNN EL, et al. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable?[J]. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(6):748-754.
[14]  CHARFI S, SELLAMI A, AFFES A, et al. Histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a study of 24,697 cases[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(8):1009-1012.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133