|
- 2015
5种检查方法在糖尿病周围神经病变诊断中的效能评估
|
Abstract:
摘要:目的 评估10g尼龙丝、振动觉阈值、温度觉、针刺痛觉、踝反射检查对糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的诊断价值,寻找经济、简便、快捷、准确的DPN诊断方法。方法 分别对151例于辽宁中医药大学附属医院内分泌科住院的糖尿病(DM)患者进行神经传导速度(NCV)测定、10g尼龙丝、振动觉阈值、温度觉、针刺痛觉、踝反射检查,以敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、约登指数(Youden指数)和Kappa值(k值)来评估各检查方法的诊断价值。结果 5种检查方法中踝反射的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、约登指数及k值分别为66.04%、95.56%、97.22%、54.43%、61.60%、0.51,与诊断标准的一致性最好,呈中度一致;压力觉的敏感度、一致性最差;其中温度觉+振动觉+踝反射组合的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、约登指数与k值分别为86.79%、91.11%、95.83%、74.55%、77.90%和0.73,与诊断标准呈中高度一致。结论 5种检查方法中温度觉+振动觉+踝反射组合与诊断标准呈中高度一致,且经济、简便、易行,临床上可用于对DPN的筛查。
ABSTRACT: Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of the 10g nylon silk, vibration threshold value, sense of temperature, pain sense and ankle reflex in the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and to search an exact diagnostic method of DPN not only economical but also easy to handle. Methods To carry out the measurements of the NCV, 10g nylon silk, vibration threshold value, sense of temperature, pain sense and ankle reflex on the patients who have been diagnosed with diabetes (DM) between April 2014 and June 2014 in the endocrinology department of our hospital. The sensitivity, specificity, positive forecast value, negative forecast value, Youden index and K value serve as assessments of the diagnostic efficiency of clinically diagnostic criteria. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive forecast value, negative forecast value, Youden index and K value of the ankle reflex are 66.04%, 95.56%, 97.22%, 54.43%, 61.60%, and 0.51 in mediate accordance with the diagnostic criteria and it is the best one among the five methods. While the sensitivity and accordance of the pressure sense are of the least accordance with the diagnostic criteria. The correspondent value of the combination of vibration threshold sense, temperature sense and ankle reflex are respectively 86.79%, 91.11%, 95.83%, 74.55%, 77.90% and 0.73, in positive accordance with the diagnostic criteria. Conclusion Among the five methods the consistency between the combination of vibration threshold sense, temperature sense and ankle reflect and diagnostic criteria is of positive accordance and can be applied in screening DPN clinically
[1] | 韩亚娟,朱波,高方,等. 糖尿病周围神经病变多种简易感觉检查方法的评价[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2011, 27:3667-3670. |
[2] | 鲍娟,唐彦,谈跃,等. 糖尿病周围神经病变临床诊断方法的价值评估[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志,2014, 22(2):122-125. |
[3] | 杨文英,纪立农,陆菊明,等. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2010年版)[J].中国糖尿病杂志, 2012, 20(1):1-37. |
[4] | 徐丹丹,马跃华,袁慧娟,等. 糖尿病周围神经病变筛查方法的实用研究[J].中国糖尿病杂志, 2014, 22(5):442-444. |
[5] | 侯瑞芳,汤正义,张 炜,等. 糖尿病周围神经病变多种筛查方法诊断效率的比较[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志, 2008, 2(6):323-361. |
[6] | BRIL V, PERKINS BA.Validation of the Toronto clinical scoring system for diabetic polyneuropathy[J]. Diabetes Care, 2000, 25:2048-2052. |
[7] | FELDMAN EL, STEVENS MJ, THOMAS PK, et al. A practical two-step quantitative clinical and electrophysiological assessment for the diagnosis and staging of diabetic neuropathy[J]. Diabetes Care, 1994, 17:1281-1289. |
[8] | MEIJIER JWG, SMIT AJ, SONDEREN E, et al. Symptom scoring systems to diagnose distal polyneuropathy in diabetes: the Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom score[J]. Diabet Med, 2002, 19:962-965. |
[9] | 臧丽,巴建明. 糖尿病周围神经病变的诊治[J]. 中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2013,7(4):3257-3259. |
[10] | GIBBONS CH, FREEMAN R, VEVES A. Diabetic neuropathy: a cross-sectional study of the relationships among tests of neurophysiology[J]. Diabetes Care, 2010, 33(12):2629-2634. |
[11] | METE T, AYDIN Y, SAKA M, et al. Comparison of efficiencies of Michigan neuropathy screening instrument, neurothesiometer, and electromyography for diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy[J]. Int J Endocrmol, 2013,2013:821745. |
[12] | 王慧珠,金世鑫. ADA:糖尿病诊治实用标准纲要-2013[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志,2013, 21(3):193-199. |
[13] | 李颖,李刚,冯波. 糖尿病周围神经病变的诊治进展[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志,2013, 21(9):769-772. |
[14] | 胡泓,李红,郑芬萍,等. 不同神经病变评分系统在无症状糖尿病周围神经病变筛查中的临床价值比较[J]. 中华内科杂志,2012, 51(1):13-17. |
[15] | PERKINS BA, OLALEYE D, ZINMAN B, et al. Simple screening tests for peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic[J]. Diabetes Care, 2001, 24:250-256. |