全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者分裂腿现象分析
Split leg phenomenon in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

DOI: 10.7652/jdyxb201805002

Keywords: 肌萎缩侧索硬化症,分裂腿,复合动作电位波幅,神经传导
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
,split leg,compound muscle action potential (CMAP),nerve conduct study

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要:目的 分析肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的腓总神经和胫神经复合肌肉动作电位波幅(CMAP)的特点,并阐明分裂腿现象及其临床价值。方法 通过对比88例下肢受累ALS患者、100例正常人及24例腰椎病患者的腓总神经和胫神经CMAP特点,分析腓总神经与胫神经CMAP之比,即分裂腿比(SLI)在3组间的差异,并通过ROC曲线分析SLI对于鉴别ALS和腰椎病患者的特异性和敏感性。结果 ①胫神经CMAP在ALS患者中显著高于腰椎病患者[(7.06±3.86)mV vs. (3.31±1.72)mV,P<0.001],腓总神经CMAP在ALS患者和腰椎病患者两组间无统计学差异[(2.49±1.35)mV vs. (2.41±1.57)mV, P=0.925],ALS患者中胫前肌失神经电位半定量显著于高于腓肠肌(χ2=61.70,P<0.001);②SLI在ALS、正常对照和腰椎病患者3组间有统计学差异(H=4.571,P=0.001),ALS患者SLI显著低于正常对照和腰椎病患者(P<0.001),正常对照和腰椎病患者两组间SLI无统计学差异(P=0.023);③SLI与病程、ALSFRS-r评分及疾病进展率均无明显相关性(Rs=-0.008,P=0.94;Rs=0.073,P=0.498;Rs=-0.082,P=0.519);④ROC曲线显示SLI可用于鉴别ALS和腰椎病患者,最佳截断值为0.634,敏感性=63.4%(95% CI=44.68%~84.37%),特异性=75%(95% CI=61.03%~77.69%),阳性预测值=88.1%。结论 分裂腿现象是下肢受累的ALS患者早期即可出现的特异性神经电生理特征,有助于ALS的早期诊断和鉴别诊断,可作为ALS早期诊断的电生理学标志物。
ABSTRACT: Objective? ?To analyze CMAP amplitude of tibial nerve and peroneal nerve in ALS, and elucidate the split leg phenomenon and clinical value. Methods?? Compound muscle action potentials recorded from extensor digitorum brevis and abductor muscle were analyzed in 88 lower-leg involved ALS patients, 100 normal controls and 24 lumbar spondylopathy patients. Results? ?① The CMAP amplitude of tibial nerve were higher in ALS than that in spondylopathy patients [(7.06±3.86)mV vs. (3.31±1.72)mV, P<0.001], and the denervation potentials were greater in tibialisanterior muscle than gastrocnemius muscle (χ2=61.70, P<0.001); ② SLI was inferior in lower leg involved ALS patients compared with normal controls and lumbar spondylopathy patients (P<0.001), but SLI had no difference between normal controls and lumbar spondylopathy patients(P=0.023); ③ SLI was not releted to disease duration, ALSFRS-r score and progression rate (P>0.05); ④ The best cutoff value of SLI was 0.634, sensitivity=63.4% (95% CI=44.68%-84.37%), specificity=75% (95% CI=61.03%-77.69%), the positive predictive value=88.2%. Conclusion? ?The split leg phenomenon is a specific neuroelectrophysiological feature that appears in the early stage of disease in lower limb-involved ALS patients, which can be used as an electrophysiological marker for early diagnosis of ALS

References

[1]  CHEN L, ZHANG B, CHEN R, et al. Natural history and clinical features of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in China[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2015, 86(10):1075-1081.
[2]  PARK DPJ. Terminal latency abnormality in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis without split hand syndrome[J]. Neurol Sci, 2017, 38(5):775-781.
[3]  BROOKS B, SANJAK M, et al. The ALS CNTF treatment study (ACTS) Phase Ⅰ-Ⅱ Study Group, The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale: Assessment of activities of daily living in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J]. Arch Neurol, 1996, 53(2):141-148.
[4]  SIMON NG, LEE M, BAE JS, et al. Dissociated lower limb muscle involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J]. J Neurol, 2015, 262(6):1424-1432.
[5]  党静霞. 肌电图诊断与临床应用[M]. 第二版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2013:100-106.
[6]  HU F, JIN J, DANG J, et al. Spread direction and prognostic factors in limb-Onset sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J]. Eur Neurol, 2016, 75(5-6):244-250.
[7]  KUWABARA S, SONOO M, KOMORI T, et al. Dissociated small hand muscle atrophy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Frequency, extent, and specificity[J]. Muscle and Nerve, 2008, 37(4):426-430.
[8]  NALABUTHU M, MONIGARI N, ELAGANDULA J. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis presenting as typical split hand syndrome[J]. BMJ Case Rep, 2014, DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2014-207647.
[9]  HU F, JIN J, DANG J, et al. Measuring the validation of assessing the non-dominant-hand function by ALSFRS-r in Chinese ALS patients[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2017, 46:17-20.
[10]  MENON P, VUCIC S. Utility of dissociated intrinsic hand muscle atrophy in the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J]. J Vis Exp, 2014, 4(85):1-7.
[11]  BROOKS BR, MILLER RG, SWASH M, et al. El Escorial revisited: Revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis[J]. Amyotroph Lateral Scler, 2000, 1(5):293-299.
[12]  KIMURA F, FUJIMURA C, ISHIDA S, et al. Progression rate of ALSFRS-r at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS[J]. Neurology, 2006, 66(2):265-267.
[13]  KOLLEVE K, MAUSS U, MOHAMMADI B. ALSFRS-r score and its ratio: A useful predictor for ALS-progression[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2008, 275(1-2):69-73.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133