全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2017 

老年Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层的手术治疗
Surgical treatment of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection in elderly patients

DOI: 10.7652/jdyxb201705030

Keywords: 急性主动脉夹层,老年,手术治疗,并发症
acute aortic dissection
,elderly people,surgical treatment,complication

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要:目的 总结外科治疗老年Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层的临床经验,探讨手术方式及疗效。 方法 收集2013年6月至2016年9月手术治疗的Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层患者(年龄≥60岁)共24例,均在全麻、深低温停循环加双侧顺行脑灌注下行外科手术。根据病情采用相应术式,其中Bentall术3例;David术1例;部分弓置换+Bentall术3例;全主动脉弓置换+象鼻支架术+Bentall术12例;全主动脉弓置换+象鼻支架术+升主动脉置换5例;同期行冠脉搭桥术3例。结果 24例患者均手术成功,全组体外循环时间(192.9±37.1)min,主动脉阻断时间(120±28.72)min,脑灌注时间(36.2.±11.3)min,手术时间(544.8±91.2)min,术后近期死亡2例,1例死于肾功能不全、感染,1例死于多器官功能衰竭;术后并发脑神经功能障碍2例,肾功能不全行CRRT治疗4例,3例术后脱离呼吸机困难,同时合并肺部感染需行气管切开,术后下肢功能障碍1例,低氧血症3例,切口感染2例。随访2~38个月,其中因心包积液再次入院治疗1例,不明原因猝死1例。结论 手术治疗老年Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层可以明显降低死亡率,改善患者生存质量;全主动脉弓置换+象鼻支架置入是治疗Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层的经典术式;根据病情选择恰当的外科处理可获得满意的治疗效果。
ABSTRACT: Objective To review our surgical treatment experience and analyze the surgical methods and efficacy of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection in elderly patients. Methods We recruited 24 patients aged over 60 years with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection treated surgically with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion from June 2013 to September 2016. Depending on the patients’ conditions, we selected different surgical methods, including Bentall operation in 3 cases, David operation in 1 case, partial aortic arc replacement+Bentall operation in 3 cases, total aortic arch replacement+stented elephant trunk implantation technique+Bentall operation in 12 cases, total aortic arch replacement+stented elephant trunk implantation technique+ascending aorta replacement in 5 cases, and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 3 cases. Results Surgical operation was successful in all the 24 patients. The average CPB time of the all patients was (192.9±37.1)min, the aortic cross-clamp time was (120±28.72)min, deep lower temperature of cerebral perfusion time was (36.2±11.3)min, and operation time was (544.8±91.2)min. Soon after the operation, two patients died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and renal failure complicated with infection, respectively. Postoperative complications included brain nerve dysfunction in 2 cases; renal insufficiency in 4 cases, which were later treated with CRRT; pulmonary infection and tracheotomy in 3 cases; dysfunction in lower extremities in 1 case; hyoxemia in 3 cases; and incision infection in 2 cases. All the patients were followed up for 2-38 months, one patient was hospitalized because of hydropericardium and another one died of sudden death with unclear cause. Conclusion Surgical treatment of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection can obviously decrease the mortality and improve the quality of life. Total aortic arch replacement combined with transaortic stented

References

[1]    BRAVERMAN C. Aortic dissection: prompt diagnosis and emergency treatment are critical[J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2011, 78(10):685-696.
[2]  MINAKAWA M, FUKUDA I, YAMAUCHI S, et al. Early and long-term outcome of total arch replacement using selective cerebral perfusion[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 90(1):72-77.
[3]  BARTOSZ R, MICHAEL S, FRIEDHELM B, et al. Outcome after surgery for acute aortic dissection type A in patients over 70years: Data analysis from the German registry for acute aortic dissection type A (GERAADA)[J]. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg, 2011, 40(2):435-440.
[4]  SUN L, QI R, ZHU J, et al. Total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation: A new ??standard?? therapy for type a dissection involving repair of the aortic arch?[J]. Circlation, 2011, 123(8):971-978.
[5]  LEE WA, DANIELS MJ, BEAVER TM, et al. Late outcomes of a single-center experience of 400 consecutive thoracic endovascular aortic repairs[J]. Circulation, 2011, 123(25):2938-2945.
[6]  BALIGA RR, NIENABER CA, BOSSONE E, et al. The role of imaging in aortic dissection and related syndromes[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014, 7(4):406-424.
[7]  PATEL HJ,NGUYEN C, DIENER AC, et al. Open arch reconstruction in the endovascular era: Analysis of 721 patients over 17 years[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011, 141(6):1417-1423.
[8]  KURABAYASHI M, OKISHIGE K, AZEGAMI K, et al. Reduction of the Pa02/Fi02 ratio in acute aortic dissection-relationship between the extent of dissection and inflammation[J]. Circ J, 2010, 74(10): 2066-2073.
[9]  朱俊明,孙立忠,赵海鹏. 孙氏手术在复杂主动脉夹层中的应用[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2013, 29(10):581
[10]  PAPANTCHEV V, STOINOVA V, ALEKSANDROV A, et al. The role of Willis circle variations during unilateral selective cerebral perfusion: A study of 500 circles[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 44(4):743-753.
[11]  陈雷,葛翼鹏,朱俊明. 累及主动脉弓的急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层孙氏手术后院内死亡的危险因素分析[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2014, 30(9):532-534.
[12]  MOON MR. Approach to the treatment of aortic dissection[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2009, 89:869-893.
[13]  STEVENS LM, MADSEN JC, JSSELBACHER EM, et al. Surgical management and long-term outcomes for acute ascending aortic dissection[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009, 138(6):1349-1357, E1341.
[14]  JAIN A, TRACCI MC, COLEMAN DM, et al. Renal malperfusion:spontaneous renal artery dissection and with aortic dissection[J]. Semin Vasc Surg, 2013, 26(4):178-188.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133