|
- 2015
121-6-9高强不锈钢管数控弯曲回弹 对材料参数的敏感性
|
Abstract:
为了研究材料参数波动对21-6-9高强不锈钢管数控弯曲回弹的影响,结合多因素敏感性分析方法和弯曲?不氐?全过程有限元模型,建立了高强不锈钢管弯曲回弹敏感性分析系统模型,并采用该模型研究了高强不锈钢管数控弯曲回弹对材料参数的敏感性。结果表明:回弹半径对材料参数的敏感性大于回弹角对材料参数的敏感性;强度系数是影响高强不锈钢管弯曲回弹最敏感的因素,其次分别为弹性模量、屈服强度、硬化指数和泊松比。通过研究还获得了各材料参数对回弹角和回弹半径的敏感性因子以及当各材料参数的输入值与实际值存在15%的误差时而引起回弹角和回弹半径的相对误差值。研究结果在优化试验方案以及提高弯管回弹预测能力等方面具有重要的作用。
To investigate the effects of the material parameters variation on springback of high strength 21??6??9 stainless steel tube in NC bending, a sensitivity analysis model of the springback is established by combining the multi??parameter sensitivity analysis method and the finite element model of whole bend??springback process, and the sensitivities of springback to the material parameters are analyzed with the proposed model. The results show that the sensitivity of springback radius to material parameters is greater than that of springback angle. The most effective parameter on the springback is the strength coefficient, followed are elastic modulus, yield stress, strain hardening exponent, and Poisson’s ratio. The sensitive factors of springback angle and springback radius to the material parameters are obtained, and the relative errors of springback angle and springback radius caused by the 15% error between input value and actual value of the material parameters are also obtained. The research results may play an important role in optimizing test scheme and improving the ability of bent tube springback prediction
[1] | [2]YANG He, LI Heng, ZHANG Zhiyong, et al. Advances and trends on tube bending for ming technologies [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25(1): 1??12. |
[2] | [6]WU Wenyun, ZHANG Ping, ZENG Xiaoqin, et al. Bendability of the wrought magnesium alloy AM30 tubes using a rotary draw bender [J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2008, 486(1/2): 596??601. |
[3] | [18]刘树勋, 刘宪民, 刘蕤, 等. 0Cr21Ni6Mn9N奥氏体不锈钢的应变强化行为 [J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2005, 17(4): 40??44. |
[4] | [19]李恒. 多模具约束下薄壁管数控弯曲成形过程失稳起皱行为研究 [D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2007. |
[5] | [20]王振华, 田野, 张龙. 不锈钢管力学性能的拉伸试验 [J]. 塑性工程学报, 2012, 19(2): 56??59. |
[6] | [8]ZHAN Mei, ZHAI Huadong, YANG He. Springback mechanism and compensation of cryogenic Ti alloy tube after numerically controlled bending [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22(sl2): 287??293. |
[7] | [9]ZHU Yingxia, LIU Yuli, YANG He. Sensitivity of springback and section deformation to process parameters in rotary draw bending of thin??walled rectangular H96 brass tube [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22(9): 2233??2240. |
[8] | [10]谷瑞杰. 薄壁管数控弯曲回弹研究 [D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2008. |
[9] | [11]李恒, 杨合, 宋飞飞, 等. 材料性能波动下TA18钛管绕弯回弹行为 [J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2014, 43(1): 64??71. |
[10] | LI Heng, YANG He, SONG Feifei, et al. Springback rules of TA18 titanium tube upon rotary draw bending under variations of material properties [J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2014, 43(1): 64??71. |
[11] | [12]JIANG Z Q, YANG H, ZHAN M, et al. Coupling effects of material properties and the bending angle on the springback angle of a titanium alloy tube during numerically controlled bending [J]. Materials and Design, 2010, 31(4): 2001??2010. |
[12] | [14]陈立周. 稳健设计 [M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2000: 11??15. |
[13] | [15]章光, 朱维申. 参数敏感性分析与试验方案优化 [J]. 岩土力学, 1993, 14(1): 24??28. |
[14] | ZHANG Guang, ZHU Weishen. Parameter sensitivity analysis and optimizing for test programs [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 1993, 14(1): 24??28. |
[15] | FANG Jun, LU Shiqiang, WANG Kelu, et al. FE analysis of section distortion in numeriacl control bending of the 0Cr21Ni6Mn9N stainless steel tube [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2013, 20(5): 71??76. |
[16] | [1]王义衡, 马竹叶, 曹建林. 0Cr21Ni6Mn9N耐高温不锈钢及其在冲压发动机上的应用 [J]. 推进技术, 1985, 6(4): 80??87. |
[17] | [3]AL??QURESHI H A, RUSSO A. Spring??back and residual stresses in bending of thin??walled aluminum tubes [J]. Materials and Design, 2002, 23(2): 217??222. |
[18] | [4]LI Heng, SHI Kaipeng, YANG He, et al. Springback law of thin??walled 6061??T4 Al??alloy tube upon bending [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22(sl2): 357??363. |
[19] | [7]LI H, YANG H, SONG F F, et al. Springback characterization and behaviors of high??strength Ti??3Al??2??5V tube in cold rotary draw bending [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2012, 212(9): 1973??1987. |
[20] | LIU Shuxun, LIU Xianmin, LIU Rui, et al. Work??hardening behavior of 0Cr21Ni6Mn9N austenitic stainless steel [J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2005, 17(4): 40??44. |
[21] | WANG Zhenghua, TIAN Ye, ZHANG Long. Tensile test and study on the mechanical properties of stainless steel tubes [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2012, 19(2): 56??59. |
[22] | WANG Yiheng, MA Zhuye, CAO Jianlin. 0Cr21Ni 6Mn9N high temperature resistance stainless steel and its application in ramjet [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 1985, 6(4): 80??87. |
[23] | [5]E Daxin, LIU Yafei. Springback and time??dependent springback of 1Cr18Ni9Ti stainless steel tubes under bending [J]. Materials and Design, 2010, 31(3): 1256??1261. |
[24] | [13]ZHANG P P, ZHAN M, HUANG T, et al. Sensitivity analysis of material parameters on spring??back of NC bending of high??strength TA18 tube [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 472/473/474/475: 1003??1008. |
[25] | [16]方军, 鲁世强, 王克鲁, 等. 0Cr21Ni6Mn9N不锈钢管管材数控弯曲截面畸变有限元分析 [J]. 塑性工程学报, 2013, 20(5): 71??76. |
[26] | [17]FANG Jun, LU Shiqiang, WANG Kelu, et al. Effect of mandrel on cross??section quality in numerical control bending process of stainless steel 2169 small diameter tube [J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, 2013: 1??9. |