|
- 2016
高超声速再入飞行器轨迹优化算法评估策略
|
Abstract:
针对高超声速再入飞行器轨迹优化算法种类多样、决策者难以优选的问题,提出了一种轨迹优化算法综合评估策略。该策略首先对算法本身的稳定性、实时性以及优化结果的可行性、安全性、过渡性、最优性等性能进行指标建模,建立优化算法综合评估指标体系;然后基于层次分析法中的两两比较判断矩阵,以欧氏距离与违例次数为精度衡量依据,将指标权重的计算转化为一类优化问题并利用遗传算法求解;之后计算加权规范化决策矩阵,综合算法数据与理想对照组在空间距离与曲线形状两方面的贴近度,提出一种灰色逼近理想解排序加权法,最终完成评估分析过程。仿真结果表明:该策略以客观数据的形式实现了轨迹优化算法的性能量化,形成了不同算法之间统一的对比评估标准,能够帮助决策者快速遴选出适合任务需求的最优算法,避免了过程中的盲目性与主观性。
A comprehensive evaluation strategy is proposed to deal with the evaluation of various trajectory optimization algorithms for the hypersonic reentry vehicle. An integrated index system is established by taking the stability and real??time performance of each algorithm itself as well as the feasibility, security, transitivity and optimality of its optimization result into account. And the calculation of index weights is transformed into an optimization problem based on the pairwise judgement matrix of the analytic hierarchy process, and the Euclidean distance and the number of violations are used as precision measures. The genetic algorithm is used to solve the optimization problem. Then, the normalized decision matrix is obtained, and a weighted grey technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is proposed by synthesizing the nearness degree in both the space and curve between the algorithm data and the ideal control groups to achieve the final evaluation results. Simulation results show that the proposed strategy uses objective data to quantify the performance of trajectory optimization algorithms, and forms a comparative evaluation standard for various algorithms. The strategy can help designers quickly select an optimal algorithm according to different mission requirements and avoid blindness and subjectivity
[1] | [1]ZHAO J, ZHOU R, JIN X. Progress in reentry trajectory planning for hypersonic vehicle [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25(4): 627??639. |
[2] | [2]TANCREDI U, GRASSI M, CORRARO F, et al. Robustness analysis for terminal phases of reentry flight [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32(5): 1679??1683. |
[3] | [3]HANSON J, JONES R, KRUPP D. Advanced guidance and control methods for reusable launch vehicles: test results [C]∥Proceedings of AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 2002: 4561??4569. |
[4] | [4]BRUNNER C W, LU P. Comparison of fully numerical predictor??corrector and Apollo skip entry guidance algorithms [J]. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2012, 59(3): 517??540. |
[5] | [5]马卫华. 高超声速飞行器制导与控制性能评估方法 [J]. 航天控制, 2012, 30(4): 7??12. |
[6] | MA Weihua. Research on evaluation method of guidance and control performance for hypersonic vehicle [J]. Aerospace Control, 2012, 30(4): 7??12. |
[7] | [6]RINAT K, BEN??ASHER J Z. Worst??case distributions for performance evaluation of proportionally guided missiles [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2000, 23(5): 895??898. |
[8] | [11]OLSON D L. Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2004, 40(7): 721??727. |
[9] | [12]WU H H. A comparative study of using grey relational analysis in multiple attribute decision making problems [J]. Quality Engineering, 2002, 15(2): 209??217. |
[10] | HUA Xiaoyi, TAN Jingxin. Revised TOPSIS method based on vertical projection distance: vertical projection method [J]. Systems Engineering: Theory & Practice, 2004, 24(1): 114??119. |
[11] | [14]FAHROO F, ROSS I M. Direct trajectory optimization by a Chebyshev pseudospectral method [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2002, 25(1): 160??166. |
[12] | [15]RAHIMI A, DEV KUMAR K, ALIGHANBARI H. Particle swarm optimization applied to spacecraft reentry trajectory [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 36(1): 307??310. |
[13] | [16]PHILLIPS T H. A common aero vehicle model, description and employment guide [R]. New York, USA: Schafer Corporation for AFRL and AFSPC, 2003. |
[14] | [7]董春云, 蔡远利. 基于正交试验设计的弹道优化算法评估研究 [C]∥第32届中国控制会议论文集. 北京: 中国自动化学会控制理论专业委员会, 2013: 8542??8545. |
[15] | DONG Chunyun, CAI Yuanli. Orthogonal design based evaluation for trajectory optimization algorithms [C]∥The 32nd Chinese Control Conference. Beijing: Technical Committee on Control Theory, Chinese Association of Automation, 2013: 8542??8545. |
[16] | [8]张杰, 唐宏, 苏凯, 等. 效能评估方法研究 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2009: 8??26. |
[17] | [10]SIRAJ S, MIKHAILOV L, KEANE J A. Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi??objective optimization [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 220(2): 461??471. |
[18] | [9]SAATY T L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process [J]. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1(1): 83??98. |
[19] | [13]华小义, 谭景信. 基于“垂面”距离的TOPSIS法: 正交投影法 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004, 24(1): 114??119. |