全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2016 

粗糙表面确定性接触模型中峰的再定义
Re??Definition of Asperity??Peak for Deterministic Contact Model on Rough Surfaces

DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201611018

Keywords: 粗糙表面,微凸峰,确定准则,峰半径
rough surface
,asperity peak,identification criteria,asperity??peak radius

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了解决目前不同微凸峰确定准则所等效的接触模型中可能存在峰的不连续、重叠、丢失而造成接触过程中缺失基准,从而导致粗糙表面在相互作用过程中不能进行有效计算等问题,在3点峰和3点谷的基础上,定义当3个连续峰的中间峰高于相邻峰时为真峰、当3个连续谷的中间谷低于相邻谷时为真谷,并对其进行匹配得到“谷?卜濯补取蹦J降奈⑼狗濉Mü?一组粗糙表面,分析了不同的采样间隔和粗糙度对峰数量、平均峰半径和峰高度的影响,并与文献中不同的准则进行了对比。结果表明:不同微凸峰确定准则所等效的模型具有很大的不确定性;随着采样间隔的增加,峰数量明显减少,平均峰半径和峰高度增大,当采样间隔小于0.5 μm时,不同的确定准则影响减小;随着粗糙度的降低,峰数量略微增多,平均峰半径增大,平均峰高度减小。该模式的微凸峰为接触特性的演化提供了一个基准。
No baseline exists to evaluate the contact characteristics for deterministic contact model owing to the discontinuity, overlapping and missing of the asperity??peak. Based on the criteria of 3??point peak and 3??point valley, the middle higher peak or lower valley can be firstly identified as the true one in the three continuous peaks or valleys, and then a new asperity??peak of “valley??peak??valley” mode is defined. The proposed criterion is validated through a set of different surface profiles, and compared with other criteria found in the literature. The results show the huge influence obtained after using these different criteria. The number of asperity peaks decreases obviously with the increasing sampling interval, however, the mean asperity??peak radii and heights increase. The effects of different criteria on the calculated asperity??peak properties become almost negligible when the sampling interval is below 0.5 μm. The number of asperity peaks increases slightly with the decreasing surface roughness, and a similar tendency is found for the mean radii while the mean heights have an opposite effect. This criterion can provide a baseline for the evolution of the contact characteristics

References

[1]  [5]BRIZMER V, ZAIT Y, KLIGERMAN Y, et al. The effect of contact conditions and material properties on elastic??plastic spherical contact [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(18): 5736??5749.
[2]  TIAN Hongliang, CHEN Tianmin, ZHENG Jinhua, et al. Contact analysis of cylindrical pair with parallel axes [J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2016, 50(1): 8??15.
[3]  [14]BIGERELLE M, NIANGA J M, NAJJAR D, et al. Roughness signature of tribological contact calculated by a new method of peaks curvature radius estimation on fractal surfaces [J]. Tribology International, 2013, 65(3): 235??247.
[4]  [11]TOMANIK E. Modeling of the asperity contact area on actual 3D surfaces: SAE 2005??01??1864 [R]. Washington, DC, USA: SAE, 2005.
[5]  [12]POGANIK A, KALIN M. How to determine the number of asperity peaks, their radii and their heights for engineering surfaces: a critical appraisal [J]. Wear, 2013, 300(1/2): 143??154.
[6]  [2]GREENWOOD J A. A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact [J]. Wear, 2006, 261(2): 191??200.
[7]  [4]MAJUMDAR A, BHUSHAN B. Fractal model of elastic??plastic contact between rough surfaces [J]. Journal of Tribology, 1991, 113(1): 1??11.
[8]  [6]赵波, 戴旭东, 张执南, 等. 单峰接触研究及其在分形表面接触中的应用 [J]. 摩擦学学报, 2014, 34(2): 217??224.
[9]  ZHAO Bo, DAI Xudong, ZHANG Zhinan, et al. Single asperity contact and its use for fractal surface contact [J]. Tribology, 2014, 34(2): 217??224.
[10]  [8]田红亮, 陈甜敏, 郑金华, 等. 平行轴圆柱副接触分析 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2016, 50(1): 8??15.
[11]  [1]GREENWOOD J A, WILLIAMSON J B P. Contact of nominally flat surfaces [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1966, 295: 300??319.
[12]  [3]NAYAK P R. Random process model of rough surfaces [J]. Journal of Lubrication Technology, 1971, 93(3): 398??407.
[13]  [7]PERSSON B N J. Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces: on the validity of the method of reduction of dimensionality [J]. Tribology Letters, 2015, 58(1): 1??4.
[14]  [9]GHOSH A, SADEGHI F. A novel approach to model effects of surface roughness parameters on wear [J]. Wear, 2015, 338/339: 73??94.
[15]  [10]GREENWOOD J A. A unified theory of surface roughness [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1984, 393: 133??157.
[16]  [13]POON C Y, BHUSHAN B. Surface roughness analysis of glass??ceramic substrates and finished magnetic disks, and Ni??P coated AlMg and glass substrates [J]. Wear, 1995, 190(1): 89??109.
[17]  [15]王庆朋, 张力, 尚会超, 等. 考虑应变硬化的混合弹塑性接触模型 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2016, 50(2): 132??137.
[18]  WANG Qingpeng, ZHANG Li, SHANG Huichao, et al. Mixed elastic??plastic contact model considering strain hardening [J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2016, 50(2): 132??137.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133