|
- 2015
评国际航空责任赔偿的法理依据
|
Abstract:
自从第一个规制国际航空责任赔偿的国际公约——《华沙公约》问世以来,关于国际航空责任赔偿的争议就没有平息过,最近发生的马航事件和2013年悬而未决的韩亚空难又把国际航空责任赔偿问题推向高潮。契约下的特殊侵权关系是国际航空责任赔偿的法律基础,同时,国际航空责任赔偿的制度应当追求损害赔偿功能与威慑功能的协调和统一、公平正义与效率的统一。国际航空运输人身损害赔偿归责制度,以及国际航空责任赔偿案件管辖的立法倾向由开始的偏向承运人,到逐步偏向消费者。文章通过对国际航空责任赔偿的法理依据的分析,认为国际公约应突出国际航空责任赔偿法的惩罚性功能。
Disputes concerning international aviation are existing since the first international aviation regulations of the International Convention for compensation -Warsaw Convention appeared, and they have achieved the peak of compensation for International aviation because the Malaysia Airlines incident and the pending Asiana crash happened in 2013. Special infringement relationships under the contract are the legal basis under the international aviation compensation, at the same time, the system of compensation for international aviation should purse the unity and coordination in the relationship between damages function and deterrent function, and the unity of fairness and efficiency. In the personal injury compensation system of International Air Transport Liability and legislative tendencies of compensation cases, the jurisdiction of the International Air trends gradually from the carriers to the consumer. Through the analysis of the legal basis for international aviation liability compensation, punitive function of the international aviation liability compensation in international convention should be highlighted.