6. Prinsen E C, Nederhand M J, Sveinsdóttir H S, et al. The influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee across varying walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial. Gait Posture, 2017, 51: 254-260.
10. Lambrecht B G A, Kazerooni H. Design of a semi-active knee prosthesis// IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Kobe, Japan: IEEE, 2009: 639-645.
[11]
11. Herr H, Wilkenfeld A. User-adaptive control of a magnetorheological prosthetic knee. Industrial Robot, 2003, 30(1): 42-55.
[12]
12. Bonnet X, Pillet H, Fodé P, et al. Gait analysis of a transfemoral amputee with a hydraulic polycentric knee prosthesis. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering, 2009, 12(1): 59-60.
[13]
13. Orhanli T, Yilmaz A. Application and comparison of finite state control of above-knee prosthesis with pneumatic cylinder at different phases// Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference. Malatya, Turkey, 2015: 2234-2237.
17. Maqbool H F, Husman M A, Awad M I, et al. A real-time gait event detection for lower limb prosthesis control and evaluation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2017, 25(9): 1500-1509.
19. Gouwanda D, Gopalai A A. A robust real-time gait event detection using wireless gyroscope and its application on normal and altered gaits. Med Eng Phys, 2015, 37(2): 219-225.
[20]
20. Inman V T, Ralston H J, Todd F. Human walking. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1981.
