全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2016 

初始治疗对胸腔细菌感染患者临床转归的影响

DOI: doi:10.7507/1671-6205.2016127

Keywords: 胸腔细菌感染, 抗生素, 胸腔引流

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的观察初始治疗是否充分对社区获得性胸腔细菌感染患者临床转归的影响。 方法回顾性病例分析收集符合英国胸科医师协会胸腔细菌感染诊断标准的急性社区获得性胸腔感染患者, 按是否给予充分的初始抗生素及胸腔积液引流联合治疗分为初始充分治疗组(31例)和初始未充分治疗组(17例), 比较两组临床表现、炎症指标及住院天数和住院费用的差别。 结果两组间年龄、性别、胸腔感染部位、伴发基础疾病等一般情况无统计学差异( P均>0.05)。初始充分治疗组体温较初始未充分治疗组下降更快, 在治疗后第5、6、7 d与初始未充分治疗组比较, 差异有统计学意义[(37.4±0.1)℃比(38.3±0.2)℃, P<0.001;(37.4±0.1)℃比(37.9±0.1)℃, P<0.05;(37.4±0.1)℃比(38.1±0.2)℃, P<0.01]。治疗后6周内, 两组白细胞计数、中性粒细胞百分比及血沉的变化无明显差异( P均>0.05), 初始充分治疗组在治疗第1周时C反应蛋白(CRP)较初始未充分治疗组显著降低[(123.1±13.8) mg/L比(182.7±25.3) mg/L, P<0.05]。初始充分治疗组较初始未充分治疗组住院花费显著减少[(28 367±3 328)元比(43 334±7 134)元, P<0.05], 住院时间也显著缩短[(25±4) d比(34±4) d, P<0.05]。 结论初始选择正确的抗生素并联合充分有效的胸液引流可以使患者体温及CRP更快地下降, 从而降低住院花费、缩短住院时间。治疗5 d体温是否低于37.5℃以及CRP是否明显下降是评价初始治疗效果的敏感指标, 有助于指导下一步治疗措施

References

[1]  7. Tokuda Y, Matsushima D, Stein GH, et al. Intrapleural fibrinolytic agents for empyema and complicated parapneumonic effusions:a meta-analysis. Chest, 2006, 129:783-790.
[2]  8. Nie W, Liu Y, Ye J, et al. Efficacy of intrapleural instillation of fibrinolytics for treating pleural empyema and parapneumonic effusion:a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Clin Respir J, 2014, 8:281-291.
[3]  9. St Peter SD, Tsao K, Spilde TL, et al. Thoracoscopic decortication vs tube thoracostomy with fibrinolysis for empyema in children:a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg, 2009, 44:106-111.
[4]  10. Sonnappa S, Cohen G, Owens CM, et al. Comparison of urokinase and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of childhood empyema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2006, 174:221-227.
[5]  1. Finley C, Clifton J, Fitzgerald JM, et al. Empyema:an increasing concern in Canada. Can Respir J, 2008, 15:85-89.
[6]  2. Farjah F, Symons RG, Krishnadasan B, et al. Management of pleural space infections:a population-based analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007, 133:3463-3451.
[7]  3. Ahmed AE, Yacoub TE. Empyema thoracis. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med, 2010, 4:1-8.
[8]  4. Maskell NA, Davies CW, Nunn AJ, et al; First Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST1) Group. U.K. Controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural infection. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352:865-874.
[9]  5. Davies HE, Davies RJ, Davies CW; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of pleural infection in adults:British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax, 2010, 65(Suppl 2):ii41-53.
[10]  6. Maskell NA, Batt S, Hedley EL, et al. The bacteriology of pleural infection by genetic and standard methods and its mortality significance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2006, 174:817-823.
[11]  11. McCauley L, Dean N. Pneumonia and empyema:causal, casual or unknown. J Thorac Dis, 2015, 7:992-998.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133