全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2016 

人工髋关节表面置换术治疗股骨头坏死疗效观察

DOI: doi:10.7507/1002-1892.20160027

Keywords: 髋关节, 股骨头坏死, 人工髋关节表面置换术, 金属对金属

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的探讨人工髋关节表面置换术(hip resurfacing arthroplasty,HRA)治疗年龄<60岁中青年股骨头坏死患者的临床疗效。 方法2008年1月-2009年4月采用HRA治疗股骨头坏死患者34例,其中男19例,女15例;左髋16例,右髋18例;年龄33~59岁,平均54岁。病因:酒精性9例,激素性8例,创伤性7例,不明原因10例。病程2~11年,平均5年。股骨头坏死改良Ficat分期为Ⅲ期26例,Ⅳ期8例。采用Harris髋关节评分系统(Harris hip score,HHS)和改良加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动评分评估患者临床效果;术后摄X线片评估假体位置及是否发生松动,并测量臼杯外展角、颈干角和股骨假体-股骨外侧皮质长度比判断术后有无股骨头假体塌陷。 结果术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无切口感染、下肢深静脉血栓形成等术后早期并发症发生。32例患者获随访,随访时间70~84个月,平均78个月。随访期间均无假体松动、感染、股骨颈骨折、脱位及炎性假瘤等并发症发生。末次随访时患者HHS评分和改良UCLA活动评分分别为(95.22±1.47)、(7.70±1.13)分,均显著优于术前的(50.10±2.27)、(3.90±0.90)分,比较差异均有统计学意义(t=1.510,P=0.008;t=0.830,P=0.003)。术后3 d与末次随访时比较患者臼杯外展角、颈干角及股骨假体-股骨外侧皮质长度比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论严格掌握手术指征,HRA可作为治疗中青年Ficat Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期股骨头坏死患者的有效方法

References

[1]  8. Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, et al. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years:a single-surgeon series. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-B(10):1298-1306.
[2]  11. Matharu GS, McBryde CW, Pynsent WB, et al. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(9):1172-1177.
[3]  12. Yoo MC, Cho YJ, Kim KI, et al. Resurfacing arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the femoral head-minimum 3 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2010, 92-B(Suppl I):145.
[4]  23. Sepp?nen M, M?kel? K, Virolainen P, et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty:short-term survivorship of 4,401 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop, 2012, 83(3):207-213.
[5]  5. Bisschop R, Boomsma MF, Van Raay JJ, et al. High prevalence of pseudotumors in patients with a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing prosthesis:a prospective cohort study of one hundred and twenty-nine patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013, 95(17):1554-1560.
[6]  13. Revell MP, McBryde CW, Bhatnagar S, et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2006, 88 Suppl 3:98-103.
[7]  25. 王聪, 马金忠. 全髋关节表面置换术术前评估及患者选择的重要性. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2010, 4(2):272-276.
[8]  1. ?Azam MQ, McMahon S, Hawdon G, et al. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing:a minimum ten years' follow-up. Int Orthop, 2015.[Epub ahead of print].
[9]  2. Imbuldeniya A, Munir S, Chow J, et al. Factors affecting squeaking in metal on metal hip resurfacings. Hip Int, 2014, 24(4):340-346.
[10]  3. Savarino L, Cadossi M, Chiarello E, et al. How do metal ion levels change over time in hip resurfacing patients? A cohort study. ScientificWorldJournal, 2014, 2014:291925.
[11]  4. Reito A, Puolakka T, Elo P, et al. Outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing at ten years:role of routine whole blood metal ion measurements in screening for pseudotumours. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(11):2251-2257.
[12]  6. Sandiford NA, Ahmed S, Doctor C, et al. Patient satisfaction and clinical results at a mean eight years following BHR arthroplasty:results from a district general hospital. Hip Int, 2014, 24(3):249-255.
[13]  7. Pailhe R, Matharu GS, Sharma A, et al. Survival and functional outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system in patients aged 65 and older at up to ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(6):1139-1145.
[14]  9. 毛远青, 徐嘉炜, 张经纬, 等. 髋关节表面置换术治疗髋关节发育不良的临床疗效. 中华骨科杂志, 2014, 34(12):1198-1204.
[15]  10. Krantz N, Miletic B, Migaud H, 等. 全髋关节表面置换在30岁以下病人中的应用:对于年轻而活跃的病人是非常有吸引力的治疗方案. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2013, 21(3):298.
[16]  14. Chun YS, Yoo MC, Cho YJ, et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head-lessons after 5 to 11-years of experience. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2012, 94-B(Suppl VIII):38.
[17]  15. Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, et al. Survival of Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients with femoral head osteonecrosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2012, 94-B(Suppl IV):7.
[18]  16. Bose VC, Baruah BD. Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip for avascular necrosis of the femoral head:a minimum follow-up of four years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2010, 92(7):922-928.
[19]  17. Kohan L, Field C, Kerr D, et al. Femoral neck remodelling after hip resurfacing surgery:a radiological study. ANZ J Surg, 2014, 84(9):639-642.
[20]  18. Wang W, Geller JA, Hasija R, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of time related femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. World J Orthop, 2013, 4(2):75-79.
[21]  19. Robinson PG, Wilkinson AJ, Meek RM. Metal ion levels and revision rates in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty:a comparative study. Hip Int, 2014, 24(2):123-128.
[22]  20. Junnila M, Sepp?nen M, Mokka J, et al. Adverse reaction to metal debris after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Acta Orthop, 2015, 86(3):345-350.
[23]  21. Langton DJ, Sidaqinamale RP, Joyce TH, et al. The clinical implications of elevated blood metal ion concentrations in asymptomatic patients with MoM hip resurfacings:a cohort study. BMJ Open, 2013, 3(3):pii:e001541.
[24]  22. Van Der Straeten C, Van Quickenborne D, De Roest B, et al. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(10):1332-1338.
[25]  24. Matharu GS, Berryman F, Brash L, et al. Influence of implant design on blood metal ion concentrations in metal-on-metal total hip replacement patients. Int Orthop, 2015, 39(9):1803-1811.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133