1. Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, et al. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2008, 90(1):2-9.
[2]
2. Novak EJ, Silverstein MD, Bozic KJ. The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2007, 89(11):2389-2397.
8. Suter T, Zanetti M, Schmid M, et al. Reproducibility of measurement of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty using computer tomography. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(5):744-748.
[6]
9. Siston RA, Cromine MJ, Gold GE, et al. Averaging different alignment axes improves femoral rotational alignment in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2008, 90(10):2098-2104.
15. Classen T, Wegner A, Müller RD, et al. Femoral component rotation and Laurin angle after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg, 2010, 76(1):69-73.
13. Walde TA, Bussert J, Sehmisch S, et al. Optimized functional femoral rotation in navigated total knee arthroplasty considering ligament tension. Knee, 2010, 17(6):381-386.
[14]
14. Czurda T, Fennema P, Baumgartner M, et al. The association between component malalignment and post-operative pain following navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty:results of a cohort/nested case-control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(7):863-869.
3. Tashiro Y, Uemura M, Matsuda S, et al. Articular cartilage of the posterior condyle can affect rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2012, 20(8):1463-1469.
[18]
4. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Kim RH, et al. Gap balancing versus measured resection technique for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1):102-107.