全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2015 

第三代陶对陶人工全髋关节置换术治疗中青年髋关节疾病的中远期疗效

DOI: doi:10.7507/1002-1892.20150229

Keywords: 人工全髋关节置换术, 第3代陶对陶假体, 骨溶解, 假体松动, 中青年患者

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的探讨采用第3代陶对陶(ceramic-on-ceramic,CoC)假体行人工全髋关节置换术(total hiparthroplasty,THA)治疗中青年髋关节疾病的中远期疗效。 方法回顾分析2001年3月-2009年5月收治并符合选择标准的68例73髋采用第3代CoC假体行THA的中青年髋关节疾病患者临床资料。其中男39例,女29例;年龄18~50岁,平均38.6岁。股骨头缺血性坏死15例15髋,先天性髋关节发育不良9例9髋,强直性脊柱炎5例8髋,骨关节炎10例10髋,创伤性关节炎12例12髋,股骨颈骨折12例12髋,类风湿性关节炎4例6髋,股骨颈部肿瘤1例1髋。采用Harris评分及美国加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分评估患者髋关节功能和活动水平,疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估术后大腿痛。影像学检查评估骨溶解、假体松动、陶瓷假体碎裂等相关并发症,并采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估假体生存情况。 结果68例患者均获随访,随访时间6~14年,平均9.7年。3例3髋采用“三明治”陶瓷内衬者出现内衬碎裂,行翻修术。1例1髋于术后3年重体力活动后出现髋关节异响,停止活动后异响消失。末次随访时患者Harris评分、UCLA评分均较术前显著改善(P<0.05)。无大腿痛出现,VAS评分为0分。患者均获骨性固定,未出现骨溶解、假体松动及下沉等并发症。以陶瓷假体碎裂引起的翻修为终点,5年和10年累积生存率分别为98.6%及95.9%;以假体松动引起的翻修为终点,5年和10年累积生存率均为100%。 结论第3代CoC假体可满足中青年患者THA的需要,中远期疗效满意

References

[1]  1. 魏召劝, 孙俊英, 查国春, 等. 采用高交联聚乙烯与传统聚乙烯髋 臼内衬行人工全髋关节置换的比较研究. 中国修复重建外科杂 志, 2013, 27(12):1414-1418.
[2]  2. M?kel? KT, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, et al. Results of 3,668 primary total hip replacements for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of 55 years. Acta Orthop, 2011, 82(5):521-529.
[3]  3. Furnes O, Paxton E, Cafri G, et al. Distributed analysis of hip implants using six national and regional registries:comparing metalon-metal with metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2014, 96 Suppl 1:25-33.
[4]  5. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Naughton M. Ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty have high survivorship at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(2):611-616.
[5]  6. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, et al. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty, 1998, 13(8):890-895.
[6]  15. Haidukewych GJ, Petrie J. Bearing surface considerations for total hip arthroplasty in young patients. Orthop Clin North Am, 2012, 43(3):395-402.
[7]  17. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in patients younger than 45 years with femoral-head osteonecrosis. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(8):1123-1127.
[8]  18. Vendittoli PA, Rivière C, Lavigne M, et al. Alumina on alumina versus metal on conventional polyethylene:a randomized clinical trial with 9 to 15 years follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg, 2013, 79(2):181-190.
[9]  21. Shin JJ, Shin JS, Kim JH, et al. Experience with sandwich liner and its high rate of failure. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2015, 25(2):233-242.
[10]  23. Yeung E, Bott PT, Chana R, et al. Mid-term results of thirdgeneration alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty:a ten-year minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2012, 94(2):138-144.
[11]  25. Keurentjes JC, Kuipers RM, Wever DJ, et al. High incidence of squeaking in THAs with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, 466(6):1438-1443.
[12]  4. Schroder DT, Kelly NH, Wright TM, et al. Retrieved highly crosslinked UHMWPE acetabular liners have similar wear damage as conventional UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(2): 387-394.
[13]  7. Mulliken BI, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, et al. A tapered titaniam femoral stem inserted without cement in a total hip arthroplasty: radiographic evaluation and stability. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1996, 78(8):1214-1225.
[14]  8. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1993, 75(2):228-232.
[15]  9. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after totalhip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1982, 64(9):1295-1306.
[16]  10. Kawamura H, Dunbar MJ, Murray P, et al. The porous coated anatomic total hip replacement. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study of a cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2001, 83-A(9):1333-1338.
[17]  11. Engh CA Jr, Culpepper WJ, Engh CA. Long-term results of use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1997, 79(2):177-184.
[18]  12. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation ofcemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1976, (121):20-32.
[19]  14. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT. Remodeling of bone around hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1996, 78(8):1226-1234.
[20]  16. Saikko V, Pfaff HG. Low wear and friction in alumina/alumina total hip joints:a hip simulator study. Acta Orthop Scand, 1998, 69(5):443-448.
[21]  19. Petit A, Catelas I, Antoniou J, et al. Differential apoptotic response of J774 macrophages to alumina and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene particles. J Orthop Res, 2002, 20(1):9-15.
[22]  20. Koo KH, Ha YC, Kim SY, et al. Revision of ceramic head fracture after third generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(1):214-218.
[23]  22. Ha YC, Kim SY, Kim HJ, et al. Ceramic liner fracture after cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. J Trauma, 2007, 63(5):1054-1060.
[24]  24. Stanat SJ, Capozzi JD. Squeaking in third-and fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty:meta-analysis and systematic review. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(3):445-453.
[25]  13. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components:a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1979, (141):17-27.
[26]  26. Tozun IR, Ozden VE, Dikmen G, et al. Mid-term result of ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(10):2027-2031.
[27]  27. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, et al. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty:update. J Arthroplasty, 2008, 23(7 Suppl):39-43.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133