全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2015 

脱细胞同种异体真皮与口腔黏膜及自体皮肤混合微粒移植再造阴道

DOI: doi:10.7507/1002-1892.20150163

Keywords: 阴道再造, 口腔黏膜微粒, 脱细胞同种异体真皮, 先天性无阴道

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的探讨在口腔黏膜及自体皮肤混合微粒移植基础上联合脱细胞同种异体真皮再造阴道的疗效。 方法2006年7月-2013年6月,收治67例先天性无阴道患者。其中47例采用单纯口腔黏膜及自体皮肤混合微粒(对照组)再造阴道,20例联合脱细胞同种异体真皮(试验组)。两组患者年龄比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.233,P=0.816)。比较两组再造阴道深度、周径、容积,创面上皮化时间及脱离模具时间,以及术后有性生活患者的女性性功能量表(FSFI)评分。 结果两组手术时间、术中出血量比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=—1.922,P=0.059;t=0.398,P=0.692)。两组患者术后均获随访,随访时间11~38个月,平均16.08个月;其中试验组15例、对照组29例有性生活。对照组4例、试验组2例出现术后出血,但再造阴道未出现狭窄。两组创面上皮化时间比较,差异无统计学意义(t=—1.938,P=0.057),但试验组术后脱离模具时间显著短于对照组(t=7.020,P=0.000)。随访观察见再造阴道湿润、光滑、富有弹性,内无毛发生长。末次随访时,两组再造阴道深度、周径及容积比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。除对照组1例患者FSFI评分<23分、诊断为性功能不良外,其余患者性功能均正常。两组FSFI评分以及各项评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论在口腔黏膜及自体皮肤混合微粒移植基础上联合脱细胞同种异体真皮再造阴道,具有创伤小、外观及性功能恢复正常,且口腔供区无破坏的优点。脱细胞同种异体真皮能提供可靠支架结构,有效抵抗腔穴挛缩,弥补了混合微粒再造术后需长期佩戴模具的不足

References

[1]  7. Erman Akar M, ?zkan ?, Colak T, et al. Sexual function and long-term results following vaginal reconstruction with free vascular jejunal flap. J Sex Med, 2013, 10 (11):2849-2854.
[2]  8. Willemsen WN, Kluivers KB. Long-term results of vaginal construction with the use of Frank dilation and a peritoneal graft (Davydov procedure) in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster syndrome. Fertil Steril, 2015, 103(1):220-227.e1.
[3]  10. Ye?im Ozgenel G, Ozcan M. Neovaginal construction with buccal mucosal grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2003, 111(7):2250-2254.
[4]  18. Gaynor BG, Benveniste RJ, Lieberman S, et al. Acellular dermal allograft for sellar repair after transsphenoidal approach to pituitary adenomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base, 2013, 74(3):155-159.
[5]  11. Lin WC, Chang CY, Shen YY, et al. Use of autologous buccal mucosa for vaginoplasty:a study of eight cases. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18(3):604-607.
[6]  12. 赵穆欣. 自体口腔黏膜微粒移植修复创面的实验研究及在阴道再造术中的临床应用. 北京:中国协和医科大学, 2009.
[7]  13. Zhao M, Li P, Li S, et al. Use of autologous micromucosa graft for vaginoplasty in vaginal agenesis. Ann Plast Surg, 2009, 63(6):645-649.
[8]  14. Li FY, Xu YS, Zhou CD, et al. Long-term outcomes of vaginoplasty with autologous buccal micromucosa. Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 123(5):951-956.
[9]  15. 周宇, 李森恺, 周传德, 等. 自体微粒口腔黏膜游离移植阴道再造术在性发育疾病中的应用. 中华整形外科杂志, 2013, 29(6):457-459.
[10]  16. Li X, Meng X, Wang X, et al. Human acellular dermal matrix allograft:A randomized, controlled human trial for the long-term evaluation of patients with extensive burns. Burns, 2015.[Epub ahead of print].
[11]  17. Mendenhall SD, Anderson LA, Ying J, et al. The BREASTrial:stage I. Outcomes from the time of tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix placement to definitive reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 135(1):29e-42e.
[12]  1. Nakhal RS, Creighton SM. Management of vaginal agenesis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2012, 25(6):352-357.
[13]  2. Allen LM, Lucco KL, Brown CM, et al. Psychosexual and functional outcomes after creation of a neovagina with laparoscopic Davydov in patients with vaginal agenesis. Fertil Steril, 2010, 94(6):2272-2276.
[14]  3. Bouman MB, van Zeijl MC, Buncamper ME, et al. Intestinal vaginoplasty revisited:a review of surgical techniques, complications, and sexual function. J Sex Med, 2014, 11(7):1835-1847.
[15]  4. Lanza H, Balestrelli J, Pastoni D, et al. Vaginoplasty technique using vulvoperineal flaps. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2014, 38(1):164-168.
[16]  5. Spyropoulou GA, Jeng SF, Demiri E, et al. Reconstruction of perineoscrotal and vaginal defects with pedicled anterolateral thigh flap. Urology, 2013, 82(2):461-465.
[17]  6. Kim SW, Lee WM, Kim JT, et al. Vulvar and vaginal reconstruction using the "angel wing" perforator-based island flap. Gynecol Oncol, 2015.[Epub ahead of print].
[18]  9. Sun X, Li C, Jin L, et al. Development and validation of Chinese version of female sexual function index in a Chinese population-a pilot study. J Sex Med, 2011, 8(4):1101-1111.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133