|
- 2016
玻璃钢管的长期刚度测量及预测
|
Abstract:
为建立玻璃钢管长期刚度理论模型并对其长期刚度进行预测。首先通过自主设计的恒位移加载试验装置,在不同初始挠度的恒位移条件下对纯环向缠绕和纯交叉缠绕铺层的玻璃钢管开展了长期刚度试验研究;然后,在试验基础上建立了不同初始挠度下玻璃钢管刚度与时间的折线双对数回归模型、50年后刚度降幅与初始挠度的线性回归模型,进而提出了玻璃钢管刚度降幅关于时间与初始挠度的二次曲面预测模型;最后,预测了玻璃钢管50年后的剩余刚度,研究了时间和初始挠度对玻璃钢管刚度的影响。结果表明:纯环向缠绕铺层的玻璃钢管抵抗刚度衰减的能力明显优于纯交叉缠绕铺层的玻璃钢管,纯环向缠绕铺层能有效提高玻璃钢管的刚度及其抵抗径向变形的能力,纯环向缠绕铺层的玻璃钢管有较好的长期力学性能。时间为8 313.2 h的测试数据表明提出的玻璃钢管刚度降幅预测模型具有较高的精度和较强的实用性。 In order to establish the theoretical model for long-term stiffness of fiber reinforced plastic pipes, and predict the long-term stiffness of them, using the autonomous designed constant displacement loading test apparatus, the testing investigations for long-term stiffness of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes with of pure hoop winding and pure cross winding plies were performed under constant displacement conditions of different initial deflections firstly. Then, stiffness vs time broken line log-log regression model of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes under different initial deflections, linear regression model of stiffness degradation rate after 50 years vs initial deflection were established based on the test, thus quadratic surfaces prediction model of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes stiffness degradation rate vs time and initial deflection was proposed. Finally, the residual stiffness of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes after 50 years was predicted, and the effects of time and initial deflection on stiffness of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes were investigated. The results show that the ability to resist stiffness degradation of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes with pure hoop winding ply are much more superior to that of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes with pure cross winding ply, pure hoop winding ply can improve the stiffness of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes and the ability to resist radial deformation of them effectively, glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes with pure hoop winding ply have better long-term mechanical performances. The test data when the time is 8 313.2 h indicates that the proposed prediction model for stiffness degradation rate of glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes has relatively high precision and relatively great applicability. 国家自然科学基金(11102142);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2016IA006)
[1] | 黄宇, 刘新红. 玻璃钢管特点性能及应用[J]. 内江科技, 2007(1):28-30. HUANG Y, LIU X H. The property, characteristic and application of GFRP pipe[J]. Neijiang Science and Technology, 2007(1):28-30(in Chinese). |
[2] | American Water Works Association. Fiberglass pipe design:AWWA M45-05[S]. Denver:AWWA, 2005. |
[3] | American Water Works Association. Fiberglass pressure pipe:AWWA C950-07[S]. Denver:AWWA, 2007. |
[4] | American Society for Testing Material International. Standard practice for obtaining hydrostatic or pressure design basis for "fiberglass" (glass-fiber-reinforced thermosetting-resin) pipe and fittings:ASTM D2992-12[S]. West Conshohocken:ASTM International, 2012. |
[5] | American Society for Testing Material International. Standard test method for long-term ring-bending strain of "fiberglass" pipe:ASTM D5365-06[S]. West Conshohocken:ASTM International, 2006. |
[6] | American Society for Testing Material International. Standard test method for chemical resistance of "fiberglass" pipe in a deflected condition:ASTM D3681-06[S]. West Conshohocken:ASTM International, 2006. |
[7] | CARVALHO A. Structural life of composite pipes-A trilogy:Part 2-Weep failure[C]//2009 ACMA Conference. Arlington:American Composites Manufacturers Association, 2009:1-14. |
[8] | GUEDES R M, Sá A, FARIA H. On the prediction of long-term creep-failure of GRP pipes in aqueous environment[J]. Polymer Composites, 2010, 31(6):1047-1055. |
[9] | BODIN J M. Buried pipe life prediction in sewage type:Environments[D]. Blacksburg:Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1998. |
[10] | FARIA H, GUEDES R M. Long-term behaviour of GFRP pipes:Reducing the prediction test duration[J]. Polymer Testing, 2010, 29(3):337-345. |
[11] | 张玉芳, 邓永容. 玻璃钢管的失效分析及失效预测技术[C]//复合材料的现状与发展--第十一届全国复合材料学术会议论文集. 北京:中国力学学会, 2000:633-637. ZHANG Y F, DENG Y R. Analysis and prediction of FRP tubular failure[C]//Present Situation and Development of Composite Materials-The Eleventh National Conference on Composite Materials. Beijing:Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2000:633-637(in Chinese). |
[12] | 魏若齐, 王欣. 塑料管材长期性能的预测[J]. 化学建材, 1993, 9(5):185-187. WEI R Q, WANG X. Prediction of long term properties of plastic piping[J]. Chemical Materials for Construction, 1993, 9(5):185-187(in Chinese). |
[13] | 董孝理. 塑料压力管的力学破坏和对策[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2006:43-78. DONG X L. Plastics pressure pipe mechanical fracture and countermeasures[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2006:43-78(in Chinese). |
[14] | FARSHAD M. Determination of the long-term hydrostatic strength of multilayer pipes[J]. Polymer Testing, 24(8):1041-1048. |
[15] | 刘洋, 董事尔, 刘倩. 玻璃钢管的应用现状及展望[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2011, 30(4):98-99. LIU Y, DONG S E, LIU Q. Application status and prospect of GFRP pipe[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2011, 30(4):98-99(in Chinese). |