全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2016 

基于改进ELECTRE法的舰船气流场方案评估方法
Evaluation method of airflow field plan in warship based on improved ELECTRE method

DOI: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0703

Keywords: 舰船气流场,指标体系,群决策特征根法(GEM),决策熵,ELECTRE
airflow field in warship
,index system,group eigenvalue method (GEM),decision entropy,elimination et choice translating reality (ELECTRE)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要 从气流场对舰载机作业的影响出发,构建了气流场评估指标体系。针对层次分析法一致性检验的缺陷,结合群决策特征根法(GEM)和决策熵理论,提出了结果可靠性可量化的气流场评估的赋权方法。结合模糊集理论知识,将经典ELECTRE法拓展到模糊环境下;排序计算中涉及到的指标评价值以三角模糊数的形式给出;使用改进ELECTRE法进行气流场方案的排序,模糊数计算保证了对大量模糊数据的完整处理。通过对3种不同气流场方案进行评估应用实例结果表明,所提出的舰船总体方案群决策方法具有较好的可行性,为舰船气流场方案评价提供了一种新的方法。
Abstract:Based on the influence of airflow field on deck-landing aeroplane operations, an evaluation index system for airflow field of warship is constructed. In view of the defect of consistency check by analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a weighting method which is combined with group eigenvalue method (GEM) and the theory of decision entropy is formed; the method can obtain outcomes, whose reliability is quantifiable. Combining the concepts of fuzzy theory, the classical elimination et choice translating reality (ELECTRE) method is extended for fuzzy multiattribute group decision making; all attribute values in sorting are expressed in triangular fuzzy numbers; when airflow field plans of warship are sorted with improved fuzzy ELECTRE, the use of fuzzy number ensures the complete processing of fuzzy data which is from the experts. Evaluation-computing is run for three airflow field plans, which verifies the feasibility of this improved evaluation method that can be a new method for general airflow field plan evaluation.

References

[1]  黄胜,郭海鹏,侯远杭,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的舰船总体方案群决策方法[J].上海交通大学学报,2014,48(1):92-97.HUANG S,GUO H P,HOU Y H,et al.Group decision-making method of warship based on improved TOPSIS[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2014,48(1):92-97(in Chinese).
[2]  黄胜,郭海鹏,王超.基于面积和斜率灰色关联度的舰船方案群决策方法[J].船舶工程,2014,36(1):100-103.HUANG S,GUO H P,WANG C.Group decision-making of warship scheme based on area and slope grey degree[J].Ship Engineering,2014,36(1):100-103(in Chinese).
[3]  侯远杭,黄胜,胡玉龙,等.基于相对熵排序的舰船总体方案评价方法[J].上海交通大学学报,2012,46(8):1218-1222.HOU Y H,HUANG S,HU Y L,et al.Evaluation of warship based on relative entropy method[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2012,46(8):1218-1222(in Chinese).
[4]  廖全蜜,黄胜,王宇,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的舰船通道人机效能研究[J].西南交通大学学报,2015,50(3):536-542.LIAO Q M,HUANG S,WANG Y,et al.Research of human performance in warship passageway based on improved TOPSIS method[J].Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2015,50(3):536-542.
[5]  李学全,李松仁,韩旭里.AHP理论与方法研究:一致性检验与权重计算[J].系统工程学报,1997,12(2):111-117.LI X Q,LI S R,HAN X L.Study of AHP theory and method:Test of consistency and calculation of weight vector[J].Journal of Systems Engineering,1997,12(2):111-117(in Chinese).
[6]  邱菀华,刘美芳.管理决策及其应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2012:131-137.QIU W H,LIU M F.Managerial decision making and its application[M].Beijing:China Machine Press,2012:131-137(in Chinese).
[7]  马俊,邱菀华,张浩.招投标决策模型及其应用[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2000,26(4):470-472.MA J,QIU W H,ZHANG H.The bidding decision model and its application[J].Journal of Beijing University of Acronautics and Astronautics,2000,26(4):470-472(in Chinese).
[8]  张吉军.模糊层次分析法(FAHP)[J].模糊系统与数学,2002,14(2):80-88.ZHANG J J.Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process(FAHP)[J].Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics,2002,14(2):80-88(in Chinese).
[9]  高璟,张强.基于ELECTRE方法的模糊多属性群决策[J].数学实践与认识,2009,39(9):21-27.GAO J,ZHANG Q.Extensions of the ELECTRE for group decision-making under fuzzy environment[J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2009,39(9):21-27(in Chinese).
[10]  XU Z,CHEN J.An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making[J].Journal of Information Science,2007,177(1):248-263.
[11]  陆超,姜治芳,王涛.利用缩比模型CFD数值模拟计算舰面空气流场相似准则数的影响探讨[J].中国舰船研究,2008,3(6):45-48.LU C,JIANG Z F,WANG T.Discussion on comparability of scaled models for CFD numerical simulation for ship airwake[J].Chinese Journal of Ship Research,2008,3(6):45-48(in Chinese).
[12]  REDDY K,TOFFOLETTO R,JONES K.Numerical simulation of ship airwake[J].Computer & Fluids,2000,29(4):451-465.
[13]  POLSKY S A.A computational study of unsteady ship air-wake:AIAA-2002-1022[R].Reston:AIAA,2002.
[14]  赵维义,王占勇.舰船空气尾流场对直升机着舰的影响研究[J].海军航空工程学院学报,2007,22(7):435-438.ZHAO W Y,WANG Z Y.Research on the effect of warship air-wake on helicopter landing on shipboard[J].Journal of Naval Aeronautical Engineering Institute,2007,22(7):435-438(in Chinese).
[15]  郜冶,刘长猛.护卫舰气流场数值计算研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2013,34(5):599-603.GAO Y,LIU C M.Numerical calculation of frigate ship airwake[J].Journal of Harbin Engineering University,2013,34(5) :599-603(in Chinese).
[16]  贺少华,刘东岳,谭大力,等.载机舰船气流场相关研究综述[J].舰船科学技术,2014,36(2):1-7.HE S H,LIU D Y,TAN D L,et al.A review of researches on ship airwakes[J].Ship Science and Tchonology,2014,36(2):1-7(in Chinese).
[17]  POLSKY S A,NAYLOR S.CVN airwake modeling and Integration:Initial steps in the creation and implementation of a virtual burble for F-18 carrier landing simulations:AIAA-2005-6298[R].Reston:AIAA,2005.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133