|
- 2018
对话语篇中对话者的心理距离预测初探
|
Abstract:
在对话语篇的分析研究中,对话行为与对话意图是很多研究者关注的焦点,具有重要的研究价值,为了能够更好地理解对话蕴含的机制,该文针对心理距离与对话行为分布做了探讨。针对已标注的对话语料内容,建立一个心理距离预测模型,同时通过研究对话行为的分布,分析得出具体差异。研究表明:在工作和爱情话题中,对话内容的心理距离得分较高,代表对话双方关系密切,问答对话有所增多,而天气话题和交通话题得分较低,对话双方关系疏远,阐述性质对话增多,并且在不同心理距离影响下,对话的反馈类型分布也有所区别。在经过对人工标注的实验数据统计分析之后,初步验证了该模型在对话者心理距离预测方面的可行性,为后续进行对话内容自动分析标注研究打下了良好的基础。
Abstract:Dialogue behavior and dialogue intention are the key focal points in dialogue discourse studies. The dialogue mechanism is analyzed here in terms of the psychological distance and dialogue behavior. A psychological distance prediction model was developed to study the corpus with differences identified by studying the dialogue behavior distribution. This study shows that psychological distance scores are higher for work and love topics, when the speakers have a close relationship and in question-answer dialogue. So the scores are lower for weather and traffic topics, alienated relationships, and statement dialogues. The psychological distance is then related to the response type distributions. A statistical analysis of the dialogue behavior confirms the feasibility of the psychological distance prediction modelfor the future studies of dialogue content.
[1] | REITHINGER N, MAIER E. Utilizing statistical dialogue act processing in VERBMOBIL[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Cambridge, USA:Association for Computational Linguistics, 1995:116-121. |
[2] | 宗成庆, 吴华, 黄泰翼, 等. 限定领域汉语口语对话语料分析[C]//计算语言学论文集. 中国, 北京, 1999, CCL-99-018. ZONG C Q, WU H, HUANG T Y, et al. Analysis of spoken dialog corpus in restricted domain[C]//Journal of Computational Linguistics. Beijing, China, 1999, CCL-99-018. (in Chinese) |
[3] | 卡罗尔D W. 语言心理学[M]. 缪小春, 译. 上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2007. CARROLL D W. Psychology of language[M]. MIAO X C, trans. Shanghai:East China Normal University Press, 2007. (in Chinese) |
[4] | 沈晨. 简述心理语言学在中国的发展[J]. 语文学刊, 2016(2):16-17. SHEN C. Description of the development of psychological linguistics in China[J]. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2016(2):16-17. (in Chinese) |
[5] | 周可艳, 宗成庆. 对话行为信息在口语翻译中的应用[J]. 中文信息学报, 2010, 24(6):57-63. ZHOU K Y, ZONG C Q. Apply dialog act information in spoken language translation[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2010, 24(6):57-63. (in Chinese) |
[6] | 张耀允. 基于用户意图分析的交互式问答技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2012. ZHANG Y Y. Interactive question answering based on user intent analysis[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012. (in Chinese) |
[7] | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司. 基于上下文进行意图识别的方法和系统. CN 104951433 A[P]. 2015-09-30. Beijing Jingdong Shangke Information Technology Co., Ltd., Method and system for intention recognition based on context. CN 104951433 A[P]. 2015-09-30. (in Chinese) |
[8] | 李志雪. 试论句子理解中几个主要的心理语言学模型[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2003, 26(3):16-20. LI Z X. A brief survey of the major psycholinguistic models on sentence comprehension[J]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2003, 26(3):16-20. (in Chinese) |
[9] | 索佳丽. 近20年中国心理语言学研究综述[J]. 忻州师范学院学报, 2016, 32(3):131-134. SUO J L. An overview of domestic psycholinguistic research[J]. Journal of Xinzhou Teachers University, 2016, 32(3):131-134. (in Chinese) |
[10] | 牛忠辉. 社会距离对他人行为表征的影响:评价内容效价的作用[J]. 应用心理学, 2010, 16(4):291-300. NIU Z H. The effect of social distance on representation of other's behavior:The role of valence of the content of evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Application Psychology, 2010, 16(4):291-300. (in Chinese) |
[11] | 吴为章, 田小琳. 汉语句群[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 2000. WU W Z, TIAN X L. Chinese sentence group[M]. Beijing:Commercial Press, 2000.(in Chinese) |
[12] | KRAUSS R M. The psychology of verbal communication[J]. International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2002:16161-16165. |
[13] | SCHL?DER J J, FERNáNDEZ R. Clarifying intentions in dialogue:A corpus study[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics. London, UK:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015:46-51. |