中国法律社会学研究的进程与展望（2006-2015）
the Process and Prospect of Researches on Sociology of Law in China （2006-2015）

改革开放以来，法律社会学蓬勃发展，学术共同体初步形成，研究成果不断涌现。本文对近十年来本土法律社会学实证研究的成果进行评述，藉此展望法律社会学的发展方向。当代中国传统纠纷解决方式弱化，诉讼日益成为重要的纠纷解决方式，已成为学者们的共识。纠纷解决机制的转型有需求解释和治理解释两种观点，但其互动关系仍缺乏令人信服的研究。学者们运用定量、定性研究方法对民众的法律意识加以研究，探究了民众的纠纷解决倾向以及对法律的认知。我们认为，要想理解法律意识的变迁与形塑，尚需结合两种方法的研究成果。当代中国司法实践存在诸多问题，学者们多从国家法与民间规范的张力入手开展研究，已形成十分成熟的研究框架，但学术增量不足。民间规范的转型与新生，民间规范如何引入立法等，或可成为研究增长点。作为法治的载体，法院嵌入于地方政法体系之中，不仅承担国家治理的职责，还对法官加以治理。处于复杂结构中的法官，承担着多重社会角色，角色间的张力得到学者们的关注。我们提出，在研究司法系统与法律职业的过程中，需关注行政干预与政治介入的区别，探究治理逻辑与法理逻辑的张力，提炼系统框架以整合现有的分散的研究成果。对于法律社会学的研究前景，我们认为应扩展边界、立足实证、由破到立、打造团队、加强合作，将法律社会学建设成为具有活力的研究领域，以回应司法改革不断深入的现实需求。
：The sociology of law in China is developing rapidly. This paper reviews the empirical researches on sociology of law in the past ten years. In contemporary China, the traditional dispute resolution is weakened, and the litigation is becoming an important dispute resolution. There is still lacking of convincing research on the interactive relationship between two kinds of viewpoints on the transformation. Scholars use the quantitative and qualitative research methods to study the legal consciousness. We believe that it is necessary to combine the results of the two methods to understand the changes of legal consciousness. There are many problems in the judicial practice in China. The scholars have carried out the researches on the tension of the state law and the folk norm, which has formed a very mature research framework. The transformation of folk norms needs further research. The court is embedded in the local political system, not only bearing the responsibility of state governance, but also needing to manage judges. The judges in the complex structure take on the multiple and full of tension social roles. We put forward that we should pay attention to the difference between administrative intervention and political intervention, explore the tension between governance logic and legal logic. We argue that the developing of sociology of law needs expanding the boundary, basing on empirical study, building the academic team, and strengthening cooperation