政治法理与道德伦理：一个比较“君子”与“公民”的分析框架
Dimensions of the Political and the Moral: A Framework of Comparing Junzi and Citizens

“君子”与“公民”的比较直接关涉中国儒家政治文化（以“君子”为主体）与西方民主政治文化（以“公民”为主体）的关系问题。那么，如何比较“君子”与“公民”呢？本文以“政治法理性”与“道德伦理性”为分类标准，建构了一个分析框架。作者把君子分成“治理主体”和“道德主体”，把公民分成“薄公民”和“厚公民”，对此四类进行一一阐述和比较。本文得出两个结论：第一，在道德伦理维度，儒家君子与西方公民有诸多可兼容之处；第二，在政治法理维度，儒家君子与西方公民难有兼容性。
：Based on the standards of classification, the political and the moral, this article builds an analysis framework to compare junzi (noble persons) and citizens. By dividing junzi into the political and the moral types and citizens into the thin and the thick versions, the author firstly comparatively describes the four categories, and then draws upon two arguments (1) in the moral dimension, Confucian junzi as moral subjects has much in compatibility with Western citizens; (2) while in the political dimension, Confucian junzi as political subjects goes against Western citizens. In light of this, the article refutes two popular arguments on the relationship of junzi and citizens