审执分离视角下案外人异议制度的变革
The transformation about the objection system of the case outsiders: From the perspective of separation between trial and enforcement

摘 要： 在“审执分离”第二次改革浪潮背景下，2007年修订的《民事诉讼法》区分了实体性执行救济和程序性执行救济，确立了“案外人异议前置、异议之诉后置”的案外人异议制度。不过，经过实践检验，“案外人异议前置、异议之诉后置”双阶结构带来了程序保障无法与权利救济相对称的现象。基于此，要深化“审执分立”改革，必须设立独立的执行裁决庭，在此基础上构建独立的案外人异议之诉程序。
Abstract: In the context of the second reform tide of separation of trial and enforcement, the substantive execution relief and the procedural execution relief were distinguished in the 2007 revision of the Civil Procedure Law, with the operation procedure to objection right of the enforcement parties and the case outsiders being enriched. However, as is tested by the empirical study, the double-stair structure--- the front disagreement of the case outsiders and their post dissent lawsuit --- brings a phenomenon that the procedure guarantee cannot match their right relief. Given this situation, we need to deepen the reform of the separation of trial and enforcement, and establish the adjudication tribunal of enforcement, on which an independent dissent lawsuit procedure of the outsiders should be built