反抗、收编与互融――“异质性”空间与文化霸权及资本逻辑的辩证关系
Resistance, incorporation and integration: The dialectics between “heterogeneous” space and cultural hegemony and capital logic

摘 要： 福柯的“异托邦”、索亚的“第三空间”、列斐伏尔的“差异空间”等理论都显示出对“异质性”空间的重视。“异质性”空间具有开放性、边缘性、反抗性等特质，由于被压制而更具革命潜能。但文化霸权与资本逻辑对“异质性”空间的收编和利用从来没有停止：既压制差异，又创造、利用差异；既从意识形态上进行同质化与无害化，又通过商品化使其卷入全球资本发展中。“异质性”空间始终是一种理论探讨而非实践策略，它与资本逻辑和文化霸权的关系由对抗、利用，到彼此融合。研究三者之间的关系需要引入动态与辩证的视角，并注意到“差异”的自我否定性以及空间固化的物质属性与理想空间不断变化之间的矛盾。
Abstract: Foucault’s “heterotopia”, Sawyer’s “the third space”, Lefebvre’s “difference space” all show special attention to heterogeneous space, which has the characteristics of openness, borderline, resistance and so on. It also has the potential of revolution because of its being suppressed. But cultural hegemony and capital logic always incorporate and integrate with heterogeneous space by both suppressing differences and creating or taking advantage of differences, by both homogenizing heterogeneous factors in ideology and involving it into global capital development through commercialization. However, heterogeneous space has always been a theoretical exploration rather than practical strategy, and its relationship with capital logic and cultural hegemony has gone from confrontation, utilization, to integration. To study the relationship between them, it needs to introduce the dynamic and dialectic perspective, and to notice self-denial of "differences" as well as the contradiction between the material property of cured space and the ever-changing property of ideal space