|
- 2017
支持养老产业发展的财税政策工具选择与应用研究
|
Abstract:
财税政策工具以其产业促进、经济发展、社会公平功能支持养老产业发展,已为世界多数国家和地区证实。本世纪以来,财税政策工具屡屡成为政府影响养老产业发展速度和质量的关键因素,其功能优势获得各方认同。然而,现行的政策文本和地方实践表明,养老产业财税政策工具欠缺对养老产业特性的提炼、工具的养老产业差异缺失、工具的类型与潜能挖掘不足以及工具间的组合配置应用不佳等困境。要想摆脱困境,并发挥财税助力养老产业发展的作用,在于养老产业的财税政策工具应用的法治化,既要实现养老产业财税政策工具的组合配置使用,又要规范养老产业财税政策工具使用。如此,方能达成财税支持养老产业发展的美好愿景。
The fiscal and taxation policy tool supports the development of the pension industry with its function of prompting industrial and economic development and improving social equity. Its functions have been confirmed by most countries and regions. Since the beginning of this century, fiscal and taxation policy tools have repeatedly become the key factor to be adopted by the government in adjusting the quality and speed of the development of pension industry. Its functional advantages are widely recognized. However, the current policies and local practices show that the fiscal and taxation policy tools of pension industry are confronted with problems like inability in refining the characteristics of the pension industry, absence of diversity, insufficient knowledge about its types and potentials and poor combination between tools. To get rid of the dilemma and give full play to finance and taxation in supporting the development pension industry, the key lies in the legalization of the application of the fiscal and taxation policy tools in the pension industry. It is necessary to not only realize the combined use of the fiscal and taxation policy tools of the pension industry, but also to standardize the use of these tools. In this way, we could realize a better vision where finance and taxation support the development of pension industry
[1] | 刘剑文. 财税法功能的定位及其当代变迁[J]. 中国法学, 2015(4): 162-179. |
[2] | BOTMAN D, EDISON H, NDIAYE P. Strategies for fiscal consolidation[M]//Japan's Economic Revival.Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008:47-62. |
[3] | MUNNELL A H. SUNDéN A E. Coming up short:the challenge of 401(k) plans[J]. Brookings Institution Press, 2004: 15-17. |
[4] | JEANCLAUDE T. Bozeman B. All organizations are public bridging public and private organizational theories[J]. Social Sciences Journal of Colleges of Shanxi, 1988, 6: 139-141. |
[5] | 李旭鸿. 税式支出制度的法律分析[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2012: 19. |
[6] | KEY V O. The lack of a budgetary theory[J]. American Political Science Review, 1940, 34(6): 1137-1144. DOI:10.2307/1948194 |
[7] | 叶金育. 体育产业发展中的财税政策工具:选择、组合与应用[J]. 体育科学, 2016, 36(6): 73-83. |
[8] | 刘成龙, 王周飞. 基于收入分配效应视角的税制结构优化研究[J]. 税务研究, 2014(6): 15-22. |
[9] | 王震. 税收优惠法律制度研究:以法律的规范性及正当性为视角[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2012: 8. |
[10] | 王锡锌, 章永乐. 专家、大众与知识的运用——行政规则制定过程的一个分析框架[J]. 中国社会科学, 2003(3): 113-127. |
[11] | 叶姗. 社会保险费改税的法律分析[J]. 税务研究, 2012(1): 52-56. |
[12] | SAVAS E S. Privatization and the new public management[J]. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2001, 28 |
[13] | HAQUE M S. The diminishing publicness of public service under the current mode of governance[J]. Public Administration Review, 2001, 61(1): 65-82. DOI:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-1 |
[14] | 徐媛媛, 严强. 公共政策工具的类型、功能、选择与组合——以我国城市房屋拆迁政策为例[J]. 南京社会科学, 2011(12): 73-79. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8263.2011.12.012 |
[15] | B·盖伊·彼得斯, 等. 公共政策工具——对公共管理工具的评价[M]. 顾建光, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2007: 61, 160. |
[16] | 郑功成. 加快健全社会保障体系[N]. 人民日报, 2016-02-02(15). |
[17] | 陈铧华. 1304万元福彩公益金投向民生事业[J]. 中国民政, 2016(2): 63-63. |
[18] | 应飞虎, 涂永前. 公共规制中的信息工具[J]. 中国社会科学, 2010(4): 116-131. |
[19] | 李放, 张娜, 沈苏燕. 农村社会养老服务的需求与发展路径研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 85-86. |
[20] | 伍海霞. "人口老龄化与养老服务业发展"学术研讨会综述[J]. 中国人口科学, 2015(4): 121-125. |
[21] | NUTTBROCK L. OUR AGING SOCIETY:Paradox and promise by Alan Pifer; Lydia Bronte[J]. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 1988(3): 475 |
[22] | 徐朝阳, 林毅夫. 发展战略与经济增长[J]. 中国社会科学, 2010(3): 94-108. |
[23] | 陈振明. 政策科学——公共政策分析导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003: 177-189. |