|
|
- 2018
5种番茄品种对烟粉虱寄主选择、生长发育及存活率的影响
|
Abstract:
为了探明烟粉虱在不同寄主上的适合度，对烟粉虱在5种番茄品种上的选择性、发育历期及存活率等指标进行了比较.结果表明：烟粉虱在5个不同番茄品种上选择性差异具有统计学意义.其中，烟粉虱偏好在粉都53番茄品种上取食，对洛番9号、金粉101、越夏红有中等偏好性，对金鹏8号无明显偏好性.烟粉虱在5个番茄品种上的发育历期、存活率差异也具有统计学意义.烟粉虱在粉都53、洛番9号、金粉101、越夏红、金鹏8号上的发育历期依次延长，而在洛番9号上的烟粉虱存活率最高，在金粉101上的存活率最低.不同寄主对烟粉虱的适合度影响较大，在对烟粉虱的抗性上差异较为明显.
To explore the fitness of tobacco whitefly (Bemisa tabaci) feeding on different hosts, the feeding preference, development duration and survival rate on 5 tomato cultivars were compared under laboratory conditions. The results showed that the selectivity of B. tabaci to these 5 tomato cultivars had significant difference. B. tabaci showed highest feeding preference on cv. Fendu 53, less feeding preference on Luofan 9, Jinfen 101 and Yuexiahong, and least feeding preference on Jinpeng 8. There were significant differences in the developmental duration and survival rate of B. tabaci when feeding on these 5 tomato cultivars. The developmental duration of B. tabaci was prolonged on Fendu53, Luofan 9, Jinfen 101, Yuexiahong and Jinpeng 8, respectively. The survival rate of B. tabaci was the highest on Luofan 9 and the lowest on Jinfen 9. These results showed that the resistance of different tomato cultivars to B. tabaci was significantly different, and feeding on different host plants had a great impact on the fitness of B. tabaci
| [1] | 庞淑婷, 王树芹, 郭玉玲, 等. 不同番茄品种对B型烟粉虱适应性的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2008, 34(4): 423-430. |
| [2] | OSBORNE L S, LANDA Z. Biological Control of Whiteflies with Entomopathogenic Fungi[J]. Florida Entomologist, 1992, 75(4): 456-471. DOI:10.2307/3496127 |
| [3] | BARINAGA M. Is Devastating Whitefly Invader Really A New Species?[J]. Science, 1993, 259(5091): 30. DOI:10.1126/science.8418492 |
| [4] | LUKEFAHR M J, COWAN C B, HOUCHTALING J E. Field Evaluation of Improved Cotton Strains Resistance to the Cotton Fleahoppee[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1970, 63(4): 1101-1103. DOI:10.1093/jee/63.4.1101 |
| [5] | LUKEFAHR M J, HONGHTALING J E, GRAHAM H M. Suppression of Heliothis Populations With Glabrous Cotton Strains[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1971, 64(2): 486-488. DOI:10.1093/jee/64.2.486 |
| [6] | BROWN J K, FROHICH D R, ROSELL R C. The Sweetpotato or Silverleaf Whiteflies:Biotypes of Bemisia tabaci or A Species Complex?[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1995, 40(1): 511-534. DOI:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.002455 |
| [7] | 周福才, 杜予州, 孙伟. 江苏省烟粉虱寄主植物调查及其危害评价[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2003, 24(1): 71-74. |
| [8] | 罗晨, 郭晓军, 岳梅, 等. 寄主植物对B型烟粉虱形态学和生物学特性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2006, 14(4): 333-339. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2006.04.008 |
| [9] | 邱宝利, 任顺祥, 林莉, 等. 不同寄主植物对烟粉虱发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(6): 1206-1211. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2003.06.022 |
| [10] | 张大山, 蒋金炜, 丁识伯, 等. 4种寄主植物对B型烟粉虱生长发育的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2010, 44(2): 180-184. |
| [11] | 姬秀枝, 张青文, 刘小侠, 等. 烟粉虱对不同黄瓜品种的选择性[J]. 植物保护, 2005, 31(4): 62-64. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2005.04.016 |
| [12] | 曹凤勤, 刘万学, 范中南, 等. B型烟粉虱对三种寄主植物及其挥发物的行为反应[J]. 昆虫学报, 2008, 51(8): 830-838. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0454-6296.2008.08.008 |
| [13] | 刘学义, 李淑香. 大豆对红蜘蛛抗性研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报, 1994, 14(4): 391-393, 450. |
| [14] | 纠敏, 周雪平, 刘树生. 烟粉虱传播双生病毒研究进展[J]. 昆虫学报, 2006, 49(3): 513-520. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0454-6296.2006.03.025 |
| [15] | VANLENTERN J C, LI Z H, KAMERMAN J W. The Parasite-Host Relationship Between Encarsia formosa (Hym., Aphelinidae) and Trialeurodes vaporarior (Hom., Aleyrodidae) XXVI. Leaf Hairs Reduce the Capacity of Encarsia to Control Greenhouse White-Fly on Cucumber[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 1995, 119(1/5): 553-559. |
| [16] | 徐文华, 左文惠, 王瑞明, 等. 烟粉虱种群在江苏沿海城市市区的寄主分布与虫源性质[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 2007, 16(3): 187-195. |
| [17] | 罗晨, 张君明, 石宝才, 等. 北京地区烟粉虱(Gennadius)调查初报[J]. 北京农业科学, 2000, 18(增刊): 42-47. |
| [18] | 钦俊德, 王琛柱. 论昆虫与植物的相互作用和进化的关系[J]. 昆虫学报, 2011, 44(3): 360-365. |
| [19] | AHMED M A. Difference in Susceptibility of Six Cumber Cultivars to Infestation By Aphis gossypii, Tetranychus urticae and as Correlated to Protein and Amino Acid Contents of Leaves[J]. Annals of Agricultural Science, 1994, 32(4): 2189-2194. |
