|
- 2018
模糊综合评判法在学术型硕士学位论文质量评价中的应用
|
Abstract:
高校评判学术型硕士学位论文质量的标准不尽相同.如何制定科学而合理的硕士学位论文评判标准始终是高校管理者、硕士生导师和硕士研究生们热切关注的话题.该文主要对反映学术型硕士学位论文质量的5个指标,即论文选题、论文创新、论文写作、论文成果及论文评阅和答辩进行综合考量.基于模糊综合评判模型提出了判定学术型硕士学位论文质量的模糊综合评价方法,以此建立高校学术型硕士学位论文质量可量化的评价机制,可以有效克服学位论文质量评价中广泛存在的受主观和人为因素干扰的弊病.该文的结果可为高校进行学术型硕士学位论文质量评价提供参考,对提升学术型硕士学位论文的质量具有重要意义,且评价方法可借助于软件实现,有利于加强学术型硕士学位论文质量评价系统化和程序化管理.
It is well known that there are many differences in evaluating the quality of academic master's degree thesis. How to design a suitable criterion of evaluation is always an important research topic interested by governors and masters. In this paper, five indicators are considered which include the subject selection of the master's thesis, the creativity of papers, paper composition, academic achievements, thesis appraisal and defenses. The fuzzy integrative evaluation method about the quality of the academic master's degree thesis is proposed by applying fuzzy integrative evaluation model. The new method can be used to realize the measurability of the quality evaluations of the academic master's thesis, and it can overcome the distraction introduced by subjective factors and human factors. The results of this paper provide a reference for University and has great significance in the development of the quality of the academic master's thesis. Moreover, the calculation can be carried out by software, thus it is helpful in realizing the routinization for evaluating the quality of the academic master's thesis
[1] | 孙文琦. 基于层次分析法的我国群众体育投入评价指标权重研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 37(6): 213-219. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5471.2012.06.041 |
[2] | 李鑫, 周靖靖. 模糊综合评判法在高校贫困生资助与教育工作中的应用[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 31(5): 155-158. |
[3] | 刘少雪. 博士学位论文评价的主观性与客观性[J]. 高等教育研究, 2014, 35(2): 54-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5149.2014.02.013 |
[4] | 王红梅, 李宏伟. 模糊综合评价模型在毕业论文质量抽查中的应用[J]. 西安文理学院学报(自然科学版), 2016, 19(1): 12-16. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5564.2016.01.004 |
[5] | 杜庆良. 学术型硕士学位论文质量评价的实证分析[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 32(6): 154-157. |
[6] | 李军, 石德万. 大学生学位论文撰写期间的信息行为对论文质量的影响[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011, 34(7): 80-84. |
[7] | 罗泽胜. 硕士学位论文双盲评审意见异议机制研究[J]. 研究生教育研究, 2018, 43(1): 44-48. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1663.2018.01.010 |
[8] | 俞婉琦.研究生学位论文质量评价指标体系研究[D].杭州: 浙江大学, 2017. |