|
- 2017
重庆市化石能源消耗的CO2排放及其峰值测算研究
|
Abstract:
运用实测法对重庆市CO2的排放量、排放强度和排放源进行了测算,并在此基础上,将STIRPAT拓展模型应用于重庆市化石能源消耗的CO2排放峰值的测算.结果表明:(1) 伴随着重庆市经济的高速增长,重庆市CO2排放量急剧增加,重庆的经济发展还是粗放型增长; (2) 历史渊源(重工业基地)和国家发展战略(东部优先发展)决定了重庆市的碳排放强度与全国平均水平还有很大差距,能源利用率相对较低; (3) 大量的煤炭消费是CO2的主要来源,其平均贡献率高达82.33%; (4) 按照当前发展趋势,重庆市的CO2排放峰值将在2025-2045年期间出现; (5) 产业转型和碳排放强度对峰值的出现具有显著影响,经济发展中成功实现产业转型升级和对碳排放强度的控制,会推动峰值提前到来.反之,则会导致重庆市碳排放峰值出现时间后延.
Adopting the actual measurement method, CO2 emission, CO2 emission intensity and emission sources in Chongqing are determined, and the STIRPAT model is applied to predict the occurrence of the peak of CO2 emission from fossil energy consumption of the city. The findings are as follows. The economic development of Chongqing remains to be of the extensive mode, and with the rapid growth of its economy, CO2 emission is dramatically increasing. Historically, Chongqing was a heavy industry base and the central government adopted a strategy of preferential development of the east, which contributed to a big gap between the carbon emission intensity of the city and that of the national average and to a comparatively low energy utilization rate. Huge amount of coal consumption is the main source of CO2 emission, with a contribution rate of 82.33%. According to the current developing trend, the peak of Chongqing's CO2 emission will arrive between 2025 and 2045. Industrial transformation and carbon emission intensity have significant influences on the arrival of the peak. Successful industrial transformation and upgrading and effective control of carbon emission intensity will advonce the peak of Chongqing's carbon emission. Otherwise, the arrival of the peak will be olelayed
[1] | 许宪春. 中国国内生产总值核算[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2002, 1(4): 23-36. |
[2] | 杨子晖. "经济增长"与"二氧化碳排放"关系的非线性研究:基于发展中国家的非线性Granger因果检验[J]. 世界经济, 2010, 33(10): 139-160. |
[3] | 中国能源与碳排放课题组. 2050中国能源和碳排放报告[M].北京:科学出版社, 2009. |
[4] | 刘伟, 李虹. 中国煤炭补贴改革与二氧化碳减排效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2014, 49(8): 146-157. |
[5] | 张成, 易建婷, 陈宏, 等. 重庆市城镇生活污水处理碳排放核算[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(9): 135-139. |
[6] | 刘华军, 赵浩. 中国二氧化碳排放强度的地区差异分析[J]. 统计研究, 2012, 29(6): 46-50. |
[7] | EHRLICH P R, EHRLICH A H. Population. Resources, Environment: Issues in Human Ecology [M]. San Francisco: Freeman, 1970. |
[8] | 陈诗一. 节能减排与中国工业的双赢发展[J]. 经济研究, 2010, 45(3): 129-143. |
[9] | 林柏强, 黄光晓. 梯度发展模式下中国区域碳排放的演化趋势——基于空间分析的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2011(12): 35-46. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5477.2011.12.007 |
[10] | 李国立, 李宗植. 中国二氧化碳排放的区域差异和影响因素研究[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2010, 20(5): 22-27. |
[11] | 渠慎宁, 郭朝先. 基于STIRPAT模型的中国碳排放峰值预测研究[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2010, 20(12): 10-15. |
[12] | COONDOO D, DINDA S. Causality Between Income and Emission: A Country Group-Specific Econometric Analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40(3): 351-367. DOI:10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00280-4 |
[13] | WAGGONER P E, AUSUBEL J H. A Framework for Sustainability Science: A Renovated IPAT Identity[J]. PNAS, 2002, 99(12): 7860-7865. DOI:10.1073/pnas.122235999 |
[14] | YORK R, ROSE E A and DIETZ T. STIRPAT, IPAT and IMPACT: Analytic Tools for Unpacking the Driving Forces of Environmental Impacts[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 46(3): 351-365. DOI:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5 |
[15] | UN. World Population Prospects: The 2009 Revision [R]. Geneva: United Nations Population Division, 2009. |