全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2017 

旅游活动对香格里拉景区土壤重金属污染的影响
Impact of Tourist Activities on Heavy Metal Pollution of Soil in the Shangri-La Scenic Area

DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2017.06.019

Keywords: 旅游活动, 土壤重金属污染, 香格里拉景区
tourist activity
, heavy metal pollution of soil, Shangri-La scenic area

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了解旅游活动对香格里拉景区土壤重金属的影响,在测定土壤重金属含量的基础上,结合相关分析解析重金属的来源,并采用内梅罗综合污染指数法和污染负荷指数法评价了重金属污染特征.结果表明:① 研究区混合样中重金属As,Hg,Cd,Cu,Cr,Pb和Zn的平均含量分别为10.16,0.291,0.52,38.67,83.78,42.26,130.27 mg/kg,其中Cu,Cd,Cr,Pb和Zn的平均含量超过对照样的13.3%,44.8%,10.6%,15.4%和13.9%,Hg,Cd,Cr以及混合样中的Cu,Zn的含量均超过了迪庆州土壤背景值,各样点Hg含量超过背景值7.45~7.53倍. ② 土壤重金属的单项污染指数从大至小表现为:Hg,Cd,Pb,Zn,Cu,Cr,As,最高污染系数污染程度从大至小表现为:Hg,Cd,Cr,Zn,Cu,Pb,As,Hg为研究区第一污染物. ③ 混合样点的平均综合污染指数和污染负荷指数分别为2.7(中度污染) 和1.06,对照样平均综合污染指数和污染负荷指数分别为1.54(轻污染) 和0.86,研究区混合样的整体污染程度高于对照样. ④ 研究区重金属Cu,Cr和Zn的主要污染源可能是旅游活动和生活产生的固体垃圾污染,如塑料制品、玻璃瓶、泡沫、卫生纸等;干湿沉降是Hg进入土壤的主要途径,旅游活动加剧了土壤中Hg的污染,导致研究区土壤Hg污染最严重.
In order to reveal the impact of tourist activities on heavy metal pollution of soil in the Shangri-La scenic area, we determined the heavy metal contents of soil samples. Then, we combined correlation analysis with the Nemerow multi-factor index method and pollution load index to track the sources of pollution and to evaluate the characteristics of heavy metal pollution. The results showed that the average contents of As, Hg, Cd, Cu, Cr, Pb and Zn of the mixed soil samples in the Shangri-La scenic area were 10.16, 0.291, 0.52, 38.67, 83.78, 42.26 and 130.27 mg/kg, respectively and that the average contents of Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb and Zn in the mixed samples were 13.3%, 44.8 %, 10.6%, 15.4% and 13.9% higher than in the control samples. Besides, the contents of Cd, Hg and Cr of each sample and the contents of Cu and Zn of the mixed samples in the study area were higher than the background values of these elements in the soil of Diqing Prefecture, and Hg content of the soil collected at various sampling sites exceeded the background value by 7.45~7.53 times. Single pollution index for the performance of heavy metals was in the order of Hg > Cd > Pb > Zn > Cu > Cr > As. The Nemerow multi-factor index of the mixed samples was 2.7, which belongs to 'moderate pollution', and their pollution load index was 1.06, while those of the control samples were 1.54 (light pollution) and 0.86, respectively, indicating that the composite samples of the study area represented a more serious degree of contamination than the control samples. The main sources of the heavy metals Cu, Cr, and Zn in the study area may be solid waste generated by tourist activities and domestic refuse, such as plastics, glass, foam and toilet paper. Dry and wet deposition was the main pathway of Hg into the soil. Tourist activities intensified Hg contamination of the soil

References

[1]  高清, 顾优丽, 龚梦丹, 等. 杭州市和睦湿地农田土壤重金属污染评价及关联特征研究[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2014, 10(2): 48-52.
[2]  党丽娜, 杨勇. 武汉市土壤重金属空间分布特征及污染评价[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2015, 34(6): 66-72.
[3]  夏国淇. 土壤环境质量标准详解[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1996, 5-6, 84-85.
[4]  范拴喜. 土壤重金属污染与控制[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2011, 69, 159-160.
[5]  陆林, 巩劼, 晋秀龙. 旅游干扰对黄山风景区土壤的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(2): 209-223.
[6]  张乃明, 段永蕙, 毛昆明.土壤环境保护[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2002, 115.
[7]  成杭新, 庄广民, 赵传冬, 等. 北京市土壤Hg污染的区域生态地球化学评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(5): 126-145.
[8]  田昆, 贝荣塔, 常凤来, 等. 香格里拉大峡谷土壤特性及其人为活动影响研究[J]. 土壤, 2004, 36(2): 204-207.
[9]  欧阳竹, 孙波, 刘健, 等.陆地生态系统土壤观测规范[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2007, 139-169.
[10]  李天杰.土壤环境学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 1995, 131-135.
[11]  李灵, 梁彦兰, 江慧华. 旅游干扰对武夷山风景区土壤重金属污染和土壤性质的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012(19): 171-181.
[12]  肖德荣, 田昆, 张利权. 滇西北高原纳帕海湿地植物多样性与土壤肥力的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(7): 3116-3124.
[13]  西南林学院, 云南省林业局. 云南碧塔海自然保护区综合科学考察报告[R/OL]. (2015-03-27) [2016-01-05]. http://book.koyfz.con/14158/3182002821.2002, 8-13, 23-25.
[14]  和丽忠.香格里拉年鉴[M].昆明:云南科技出版社, 2012, 263.
[15]  和丽忠.香格里拉年鉴[M].昆明:云南科技出版社, 2013, 259.
[16]  王金亮, 王平, 鲁芬, 等. 碧塔海景区旅游活动对湿地生态环境影响研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2004, 23(5): 101-108.
[17]  陈雪龙, 齐艳萍, 吴海燕, 等. 大庆龙凤湿地土壤重金属空间分布特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013, 20(4): 141-144.
[18]  李鹏, 濮励杰, 章锦河. 旅游活动对土壤环境影响的国内研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(8): 1097-1105. DOI:10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.08.014
[19]  马建华, 朱玉涛. 嵩山景区旅游活动对土壤组成性质和重金属污染的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(3): 955-965.
[20]  蒋高明, 黄晓银. 旅游和城市化对避暑山庄土壤、植物的影响[J]. 环境科学, 1990(11): 35-39.
[21]  晋秀龙, 陆林, 巩劫, 等. 旅游活动对九华山风景区土壤的冲击影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(11): 1881-1892. DOI:10.11849/zrzyxb.2009.11.003
[22]  罗珊, 张昆, 彭涛, 等. 旅游活动对高原湿地纳帕海土壤理化性质的影响研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(6): 2391-2393.
[23]  王全辉, 董元杰, 刘春生, 等. 旅游活动对泰山景区土壤质量的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(2): 398-402.
[24]  李丽娜. 明月山景区旅游活动对土壤成分和重金属污染的影响[J]. 宜春学院学报 (自然科学版), 2011, 33(12): 118-119.
[25]  陈飙, 杨桂华. 旅游者践踏对生态旅游景区土壤影响定量研究—以香格里拉碧塔海生态旅游景区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(3): 371-375.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133