|
- 2018
日光温室中不同樱桃品种果实外在品质的比较
|
Abstract:
为了比较天津地区温室栽植的樱桃果实的外在品质,以SUM、MZ、BLA、EBF、RED、AM和矮化SUM等7个品种的果实为试验材料,研究了其果实硬度、果型指数、单果质量、果柄长度、果实明暗度以及肉核比.结果表明:AM的硬度最高,为21 369.15 g/cm2,MZ的硬度最低,是AM的0.6倍;AM(0.9927)、EBF(0.992)和RED(0.982)的果形指数较大,显著大于其他品种;AM单果质量最大为7.385 g,EBF的单果质量最低,为4.273 g;SUM (3.307 cm)、AM(3.176 cm)和MZ(3.218 cm)的果柄较长,显著大于其他4个品种;MZ品种果实明暗度(黑白)L值和黄蓝色b值最高,果实呈亮黄色;EBF品种果实L值、红绿色a值及b值均较高,果实呈紫红色;SUM品种果实A值较高,为深红色;BLA(19.72)和MZ(19.48)、AM(18.86)3个品种的肉核比显著大于其他4个品种.隶属函数分析显示,供试樱桃品种的外在品质从好到差排序为:AM,BLA,SUM和RED,EBF和矮化SUM,MZ.
In order to compare the external quality of cherry fruit planted in greenhouses in Tianjin, seven cherry varieties (SUM, MZ, BLA, EBF, RED, AM and Dwarf SUM) were used as the experiment materials and their fruit hardness, fruit index, fruit weight, fruit stalk (carpopodium) length, fruit brightness and pulp/seed ratio were recorded and compared. The results showed that AM had the highest hardness (21 369.15 g/cm2), while the hardness of MZ was the lowest, being 60% of that of AM; the fruit shape index of AM (0.992 7), EBF (0.992) and RED (0.982) was significantly larger than that of the other varieties. Single fruit weight of AM was the highest (7.385 g), while that of EBF was the lowest (4.273 g). The carpopodium of AM (3.176 cm), SUM (3.307 cm) and MZ (3.218 cm) was significantly longer than that of the other four varieties. The fruit of MZ was bright yellow in color, with the highest lightness (black and white) - L value and b value (yellow and blue saturation). The fruit of EBF was purple red in color, and its L, a and b values were comparatively high. The fruit of SUM was dark red with fairly high A value. The pulp/seed ratio of BLA (19.72), MZ (19.48) and AM (18.86) was not significantly different among themselves, but significantly greater than that of the other 4 varieties. The external quality of the cherry varieties studied was in the order of AM, BLA, SUM/RED, EBF/mSUM, MZ according to a membership function analysis
[1] | 王小伟, 尚志华, 张强, 等. 樱桃透光和郁闭树冠相对光照强度及其果实品质和产量的差异[J]. 园艺学报, 2009, 36(2): 157-162. |
[2] | 王贤萍, 段泽敏, 戴桂林, 等. 甜樱桃主要栽培品种多酚含量的测定与品质分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011(13): 173-176. |
[3] | LI Y, FANG W C, ZHU G R, et al. Accumulated Chilling Hours During Endodormancy Impact Blooming and Fruit Shape Development in Peach (Prunus persica L.)[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(6): 1267-1274. DOI:10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61374-6 |
[4] | 葛文志, 殷东生, 郭树平. 沙棘品种间果实性状变异性分析[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2015(2): 27-30. |
[5] | 马洪英, 张远芳, 张晓磊, 等. 运用隶属函数综合评价七份番茄种质资源[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(1): 13-15. |
[6] | 刘科鹏, 黄春辉, 冷建华, 等. 猕猴桃园土壤养分与果实品质的多元分析[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(6): 1047-1051. |
[7] | 李亚华, 陈龙, 高荣广, 等. LED光质对茄子果实品质及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(9): 2728-2734. |
[8] | 陈竹君, 王益权, 周建斌, 等. 日光温室栽培对土壤养分累积及交换性养分含量和比例的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(1): 5-8. |
[9] | MA W, NIU Y Y, LUO Q W, et al. Differences of Photosynthetic Characteristics of the Grape Cultwated in Green Hous and Open Ficld in Turpan[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 17(6): 1285-1288, 1340. |
[10] | 霍宏亮, 曹玉芬, 田路明, 等. 不同梨品种果胶含量与品质特性相关性研究[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2016, 16(6): 111-115. |
[11] | 黄卫东, 吴兰坤, 战吉成. 中国矮樱桃叶片生长和光合作用对弱光环境的适应性调节[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(12): 1981-1985. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.12.033 |
[12] | 张睿佳, 李瑛, 虞秀明, 等. 高温胁迫与外源油菜素内酯对'巨峰'葡萄叶片光合生理和果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2015, 32(4): 590-596. |
[13] | 岳英, 鲁晓燕, 刘艳, 等. 梨不同品种果实硬度与果胶含量的相关性研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(15): 15-17. |