全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

社会距离对不公平行为回应的影响
Effect of Social Distance on the Response to Unfair Behaviors

DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2018.02.020

Keywords: 社会距离, 内群体, 外群体, 不公平行为
social distance
, in-group, out-group, unfair behavior

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

两个实验在群体层面探讨了奖励和债务领域社会距离(内群体/外群体)对不公平行为回应的影响.实验1采用标准最后通牒游戏范式,发现在奖励领域,个体对内群体成员不公平行为的接受程度比对外群体成员的接受程度更高.实验2使用改编的最后通牒游戏范式,结果表明在债务领域,个体对内群体成员不公平行为的接受程度也比对外群体成员的接受程度更高,且对内群体成员不公平行为的满意度比对外群体更高.该研究表明,即使内群体成员违反公平规则,个体还是会表现出内群体偏好.
Two experiments were made in which standard and revised ultimatum game (UG) were used to explore the effect of social distance on the response to unfair behaviors. Experiment one, which adopted the standard UG, used a two-factor within-subject experimental design. The results showed that subjects accepted more unfair distribution plan from in-group members than from out-group members. The fairness of sharing the debt is as important as sharing the reward. So a second experiment was designed to explore the effect of social distance on the response to unfair behaviors in the area of debt. The results showed that people accepted more unfair distribution from in-group members than that from out-groud members; and felt more satis fied to in-ground unfair distribution plan. In sum, our findings showed that the closer the social distance was, the more able people would be to tolerate and satisfy with unfair behaviors

References

[1]  WU Y, LELIVELD M C, ZHOU X. Social Distance Modulates Recipient's Fairness Consideration in the Dictator Game: an ERP Study[J]. Biol Psychol, 2011, 88(2-3): 253-262. DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.08.009
[2]  VAN'T WOUT M, KAHN R S, SANFEY A G, et al. Affective State and Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game[J]. Exp Brain Res, 2006, 169(4): 564-568. DOI:10.1007/s00221-006-0346-5
[3]  DE DREU C K W, GREER L L, HANDGRAAF M J J, et al. The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Regulates Parochial Altruism in Intergroup Conflict Among Humans[J]. Science, 2010, 328(5984): 1408-1411. DOI:10.1126/science.1189047
[4]  MCLEISH K N, OXOBY R J. Social Interactions and the Salience of Social Identity[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2011, 32(1): 172-178. DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.003
[5]  ANDERSEN-NISSEN E, SMITH K D, STROBE K L, et al. Evasion of Toll-Like Receptor 5 by Flagellated Bacteria[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102(26): 9247-9252. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0502040102
[6]  ZHOU X, WU Y. Sharing Losses and Sharing Gains: Increased Demand for Fairness Under Adversity[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011, 47(3): 582-588. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.017
[7]  HOGG M A. Uncertainty-Identity Theory[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2007, 39: 69-126. DOI:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8
[8]  HEWIG J, KRETSCHMER N, TRIPPE R H, et al. Why Humans Deviate from Rational Choice[J]. Psychophysiology, 2011, 48(4): 507-514. DOI:10.1111/psyp.2011.48.issue-4
[9]  AKERLOF G A, KRANTON R E. Economics and Identity[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 115(3): 715-753. DOI:10.1162/qjec.2000.115.issue-3
[10]  BILLIG M, ABRAMS D, HOGG M A. Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances[J]. Contemporary Sociology, 1991, 20(6): 944-945. DOI:10.2307/2076221
[11]  DE DREU C K W. Oxytocin Modulates Cooperation within and Competition Between Groups: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda[J]. Hormones and Behavior, 2012, 61(3): 419-428. DOI:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.009
[12]  马振, 王丽金, 郑伟. 宽恕和公正过程相互关系的研究述评[J]. 社会心理科学, 2013(1): 11-15.
[13]  张建玲, 赵玉芳. 群际威胁与对内群体和外群体支持决策的关系研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(4): 152-156.
[14]  CHANG L J, SANFEY A G. Great Expectations: Neural Computations Underlying the Use of Social Norms in Decision-Making[J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2013, 8(3): 277-284. DOI:10.1093/scan/nsr094
[15]  MENDOZA S A, LANE S P, AMODIO D M. For Members Only Ingroup Punishment of Fairness Norm Violations in the Ultimatum Game[J]. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2014, 5(6): 662-670. DOI:10.1177/1948550614527115
[16]  赵凡. 群体归属感与公正类型对冲突解决的影响[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2014. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y2624338
[17]  ITO T, OGAWA K, SUZUKI A, et al. Contagion of Self-Interested Behavior: Evidence from Group Dictator Game Experiments[J]. German Economic Review, 2016, 17(4): 425-437. DOI:10.1111/geer.2016.17.issue-4
[18]  KUBOTA J T, LI J, BAR-DAVID E, et al. The Price of Racial Bias: Intergroup Negotiations in the Ultimatum Game[J]. Psychol Sci, 2013, 24(12): 2498-2504. DOI:10.1177/0956797613496435
[19]  WU Y, ZHOU Y, VAN DIJK E, et al. Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2011, 5: 131.
[20]  BRVNE M, SCHEELE D, HEINISCH C, et al. Empathy Moderates the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Costly Punishment[J]. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(9): e44747. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0044747
[21]  张婍, 冯江平, 王二平. 群际威胁的分类及其对群体偏见的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(2): 473-480.
[22]  李芳丽, 赵玉芳. 现实群际威胁的认知评估对执行功能影响的研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(12): 116-121.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133