基于文献计量的国内外农业信息化研究态势分析
Status and Trends of Researches of Agricultural Informatization Based on Bibliometric Analysis

农业信息化的理论研究与实践总结是学界的研究热点.利用文献计量学方法，以CiteSpace为手段，基于Web of Science数据库和CNKI数据库，分析了近年来国内外农业信息化领域研究的发展态势，为该领域科研工作者与决策者提供参考.结果显示：国外方面，美国、英国、澳大利亚、荷兰等国家的研究处于国际领先地位；国家科研机构和大学为主要发文机构，其中美国研究机构发文最多；来自荷兰和美国的作者发文最多，但也比较分散；高影响力论文大多来自美国、欧洲等发达国家和地区；来自美国和荷兰等国的期刊较多，且语种多为English；更加关注现代信息技术在具体农业管理和农业生产中的应用研究.国内方面，中国虽与美国、澳大利亚、加拿大、英国等发达国家开展了比较频繁的国际合作，但发文质量存在较大差距；中国农业科学院是相对优势比较突出的机构；研究比较宽泛，且发表刊物总体水平不高，中文核心期刊较少.
Theoretical research and practice summarization of agricultural informatization is now a research hotspot in the academic field. By means of CiteSpace, bibliometric analysis methods are employed in this paper to investigate the papers published in recent years in the databases Web of Science and CNKI, based on indexes such as paper literature number, countries (regions), authors, major journals and citations. The current situation of agricultural informatization research both in China and in the world is analyzed for the purpose of understanding the hot topics at present and providing useful data for researchers and decision makers in the field of agricultural informatization. Based on these papers, the United States, Britain, Australia and the Netherlands are in the top position in the world in the field of agricultural informatization. The papers are mainly issued by national research institutions and universities, most of which are from the United States. Their authors are mostly from the Netherlands and the United States, though they are relatively dispersed. High-impact papers are mostly from the United States, Europe and other developed countries and regions; and journals with a high impact factor (IF) are mainly from the United States, the Netherlands and some other countries, and the language used is generally English. The major research direction is the application of modern information technology in specific agricultural management and agricultural production. Though China has made quite frequent international coopation with developed countris such as the United States, Australia, Canada, and Britain, there remains a rather big gap between China and these countries in the quality of the published papers. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences has comparative advantages over other institutions in China. The domestic research of agricultural informatization is quite broad; and the ranks of the publishing journals are not high enough, and few of the journals are on the list of 'core journals of China'