|
- 2018
三峡库区重庆段生态承载力时空演变研究
|
Abstract:
基于生态承载力相关理论,从生态弹力、承载压力和承载支撑力3个子系统出发,运用层次分析法对库区生态承载力进行综合测算评价.结果表明:1)研究区生态承载力总体处于中等稳定状态,生态弹性力处于中等水平,承载压力较大,承载支撑力较弱;2)总体来看,由于退耕还林及渝东南渝东北生态保护措施,研究区生态承载力平均水平呈稳步上升状态,2011年为0.500,2015年为0.521,承载力标准差较小,离散度不高,生态系统相对稳定;3)局部来看,研究区东北部巫溪、巫山、奉节等地生物丰度、植被覆盖率较高,生态承载力最好,而主城区及江津区生态承载力水平最低,生态系统自我调节与恢复能力以及对经济社会发展的支撑能力远不如渝东北地区.合理开发利用资源,准确把握产业发展模式及经济增长速度,加大环保投资力度对库区可持续发展及生态文明建设显得尤为重要.
Based on the theories related to ecological carrying capacity and starting from the three subsystems of ecological elasticity, environment bearing pressure and environment carrying capacity, a comprehensive calculation and evaluation of the ecological carrying capacity of Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) Area was made with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in a study reported below. The results showed that the ecological carrying capacity of the study area was described as 'moderately stable', the ecological elasticity was at an intermediate level, the pressure on environment bearing support was rather great, and the environment carrying capacity was weak. On the whole, because of re-afforestation and the measures of ecological protection taken in southeastern and northeastern Chongqing, the ecological carrying capacity (ECC) of the study area showed an upward trend, being 0.500 in 2011 and 0.521 in 2015, with a small standard deviation and a small dispersion, which showed a relatively steady ecosystem in this area. Locally, the biological abundance index and vegetation cover in Wuxi, Wushan and Fengjie were higher than in the central urban area of Chongqing and in Jiangjin district, and the ecosystem recovery capacity and the supporting in driving economic development of the latter were far less than those of the former. Therefore, It is particularly important to exploit resources reasonably, grasp the characteristics of the creative industry and increase investment in environment protection so as to realize a sustainable development and ecological civilization construction in TRG
[1] | GUEVARA J C, CAVAGNARO J B, ESTEVEZ O R, et al. Productivity, Management and Development Problems in the Arid Rangelands of the Central Mendoza Plains(Argentina)[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1997, 35(4): 575-600. DOI:10.1006/jare.1996.0194 |
[2] | SMAAL A C, PRINS T C, DANKERS N, et al. Minimum Requirements for Modeling Bivalve Carrying Capacity[J]. Aquatic Ecology, 1997, 31(4): 423-428. DOI:10.1023/A:1009947627828 |
[3] | 王影, 柴立和. 生态承载力水平评价的动态模型及其应用——以洞庭湖生态经济区为例[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(5): 1859-1865. |
[4] | 沈渭寿, 张慧, 邹长新, 等. 区域生态承载力和生态安全研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2010. |
[5] | 环境保护部. 生态环境状况评价技术规范(发布稿): HJ192-2015 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2015. |
[6] | 金悦, 陆兆华, 檀菲菲, 等. 典型资源型城市生态承载力评价——以唐山市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(14): 4852-4859. |
[7] | 毛汉英, 余丹林. 区域承载力定量研究方法探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(4): 549-555. |
[8] | WACKERNAGEL M, YOUNT J D. Footprints for Sustainability: The Next Steps[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2000, 2(1): 23-44. DOI:10.1023/A:1010050700699 |
[9] | 岳东霞, 杜军, 刘俊艳, 等. 基于RS和转移矩阵的泾河流域生态承载力时空动态评价[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(9): 2550-2558. |
[10] | 王家骥, 姚小红, 李京荣, 等. 黑河流域生态承载力估测[J]. 环境科学研究, 2000, 13(2): 44-48. |
[11] | 熊建新, 陈端吕, 谢雪梅, 等. 基于状态空间法的洞庭湖区生态承载力综合评价研究[J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(11): 138-142. |
[12] | 刘婷婷. 金沙江上游流域生态承载力及人与生态系统关系研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2012. |
[13] | 龙伟, 郑钦玉, 何艺, 等. 重庆生态城市指标体系的建立及综合评价[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 28(5): 881-884, 888. |
[14] | 赵伟, 黄婧, 张智红. 基于GIS的重庆市洪灾综合风险评估研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 42(2): 34-42. |
[15] | 庄伟, 廖和平, 潘卓, 等. 基于变权TOPSIS模型的三峡库区土地生态安全评估——以巫山县为例[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 36(8): 106-112. |
[16] | 高吉喜. 新世纪生态环境管理的理论与方法[J]. 环境保护, 2002, 30(7): 9-14. |
[17] | 高吉喜. 可持续发展理论探索:生态承载力理论、方法与应用[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2001. |
[18] | 王丽婧, 席春燕, 付青, 等. 基于景观格局的三峡库区生态脆弱性评价[J]. 环境科学研究, 2010, 23(10): 1268-1273. |
[19] | 王丽婧, 李虹, 郑丙辉, 等. 三峡库区生态承载力探讨[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2014, 37(11): 169-174, 179. |
[20] | 刘春霞, 李月臣, 杨华, 等. 三峡库区重庆段生态与环境敏感性综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(5): 631-642. DOI:10.11821/xb201105006 |