|
|
- 2016
不同能量密度Nd:YAG激光照射对牙本质粘接强度的影响
|
Abstract:
摘要 目的:研究不同能量密度下Nd:YAG激光照射对牙本质粘接强度的影响。方法:36颗无龋第三磨牙去除冠方牙釉质,随机分为3组:对照组低能量密度激光照射组(1 W,85 J/cm2)和高能量密度激光照射组(4 W, 350 J/cm2)。每组牙再随机分为两个亚组,分别使用全酸蚀(Single Bond 2)或自酸蚀粘接剂(G-Bond)进行粘接以及树脂修复。进行微拉伸粘接强度测试,扫描电镜观察牙本质表面形貌及粘接界面纳米渗漏情况。激光扫描共聚焦荧光显微镜下观察粘接界面树脂突形态及数量。结果:全酸蚀粘接中,低密度激光照射对粘接强度无影响,高密度激光照射后粘接强度相比对照组降低(P<0.05);自酸蚀粘接中,低密度激光照射后粘接强度比对照组显著下降(P<0.05),高密度激光照射对粘接强度无影响。低密度激光照射不增加粘接界面纳米渗漏,高密度激光照射后样本纳米渗漏相比对照组均显著增加(P<0.05)。结论:低能量密度的激光照射后使用全酸蚀粘接系统粘接效果较好;高能量密度的激光照射后使用自酸蚀粘接系统效果较好
| [1] | Gholami GA, Fekrazad R, Esmaiel-Nejad A, Kalhori KA. An evaluation of the occluding effects of Er;Cr:YSGG, Nd:YAG, CO(2) and diode lasers on dentinal tubules: a scanning electron microscope in vitro study [J]. Photomedicine and laser surgery,2011,29∶115-21 |
| [2] | Trevelin LT, Marques MM, Aranha AC, et al. Effect of super short pulse Er:YAG laser on human dentin--Scanning electron microscopy analysis [J]. Microscopy research and technique, 2015, 78∶472-8 |
| [3] | Ceballo L, Toledano M, Osorio R, et al. Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin [J]. Journal of dental research,2002,81∶119-22 |
| [4] | Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Matsumoto K. Lasers in endodontics: a review [J]. International endodontic journal, 2000, 33∶173-85 |
| [5] | de Oliveira MT, de Freitas PM, de Paula Eduardo C, et al. Influence of Diamond Sono-Abrasion, Air-Abrasion and Er:YAG Laser Irradiation on Bonding of Different Adhesive Systems to Dentin [J]. European journal of dentistry, 2007, 1∶158-66 |
| [6] | Jiang Q, Chen M, Ding J. Comparison of tensile bond strengths of four one-bottle self-etching adhesive systems with Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin [J]. Molecular biology reports, 2013, 40∶7053-9 |
| [7] | Antunes A, de Rossi W, Zezell DM. Spectroscopic alterations on enamel and dentin after nanosecond Nd:YAG laser irradiation. Spectrochimica acta Part A [J]. Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy, 2006, 64∶1142-6 |
