|
|
- 2015
酸蚀对轻中度氟斑牙釉质粘接强度影响的系统评价
|
Abstract:
摘要 目的:系统评价轻中度氟斑牙釉质粘接时更有效的酸蚀方式。方法:计算机检索8个电子数据库,结合手工检索有关氟斑牙釉质粘接的随机或半随机对照实验(RCTs/CCTs),无时间、地区和语言限制;按照纳入排除标准,筛选文献并提取相关数据,风险评估后纳入合格文献,作出定性、定量评价。结果:共纳入8篇文献,Meta分析结果:WMD(全酸蚀:轻中度氟斑牙/正常牙)=-0.00,95%CI[-0.30,0.29];WMD(自酸蚀:轻中度氟斑牙/正常牙)=-0.80,95%CI[-1.07,-0.53];WMD(轻中度氟斑牙:自/全)=-6.08,95%CI[-7.70,-4.46]。说明轻中度氟斑牙全酸蚀时抗剪切强度(SBS)与正常牙无统计学差异,自酸蚀时低于正常牙;全酸蚀时SBS高于自酸蚀。结论:相同情况下,轻中度氟斑牙釉质粘接时,全酸蚀的粘接强度不低于或高于自酸蚀
| [1] | 朱强,王满恩.氟斑牙脱色治疗及再矿化修复的探讨[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1991,(4)∶195-198 |
| [2] | 曾宪涛,包翠萍,曹世义,等.Meta分析系列之三:随机对照试验的质量评价工具[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,04(3)∶183-185[10] Weerasinghe DS. Micro-shear bond strength and morphological analysis of a self-etching primer adhesive system to fluorosed enamel [J]. J Dent, 2005, 33(5)∶419-426 |
| [3] | Ertugrul F, Türkün M, Türkün L S, et al. Bond strength of different dentin bonding systems to fluorotic enamel [J]. J AdhesDent, 2009, 11(4)∶299-303 |
| [4] | Shafiei F, JOWKAR Z, Fekrazad R, et al. Micromorphology analysis and bond strength of two adhesives to Er,Cr:YSGG laser‐prepared vs. Bur-preparedfluorosed enamel [J]. Microsc Res Techniq, 2014, 77(10)∶779-784 |
| [5] | RG. R. Epidemiologic indices for measuring the clinical manifestations of dental fluorosis: overview and critique [J]. AdvDent Res, 1994, 8(1)∶39-55 |
| [6] | Walls AW, Steele JG, Rw. W. Crowns And Other Extra-Coronal Restorations: Porcelain Laminate Veneers [J]. Brit Dent J, 2002, 193(2)∶73 |
| [7] | 王丽华,赵新华,沈雁峰,等.氟斑牙的临床治疗方法[J].中华地方病学杂志, 1999, 18(5)∶390-391 |
| [8] | 刘希德.磨除酸蚀法在氟斑牙修复中的应用[J].中医临床研究,2010,2(6)∶82-82 |
| [9] | Ratnaweera PM, Nikaido T, Weerasinghe D, et al. Micro-shear bond strength of two all-in-one adhesive systems to unground fluorosed enamel [J]. Dent Mater J, 2007, 26(3)∶355-360 |
| [10] | Aoba T, Fejerskov O. Dental Fluorosis: Chemistry and Biology [J]. CritRev Oral Biol M, 2002, 13(2)∶155-170 |
| [11] | Miller RA. Bonding fluorosed teeth: new materials for old problems [J]. J ClinOrthodJco, 1995, 29 |
| [12] | Noble J. In Vivo Bonding Of Orthodontic Brackets To Fluorosed Enamel Using An Adhesion Promotor [J]. Angle Orthod, 2008, 78(2)∶357-360 |
| [13] | Robinson C, Connell S, Kirkham J, et al. The Effect of Fluoride on the Developing Tooth [J]. Caries Res, 2004, 38(3)∶268-276 |
| [14] | 韩晓虹,崔玉美.冷光美白氟斑牙的疗效观察[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(12)∶53-53 |
| [15] | Toman M; Cal E; Türkün M; Ertu06rul F. Bond strength of glass-ceramics on the fluorosed enamel surfaces [J]. J Dent, 2008, 36(4)∶281-286 |
| [16] | Gungor A Y. Effects of fluorosis and self etching primers on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets [J]. EurJDent, 2009, 3(3) |
| [17] | Shida K, Kitasako Y, Burrow M F, et al. Micro-shear bond strengths and etching efficacy of a two-step self-etching adhesive system to fluorosed and non-fluorosedenamel [J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2009, 117(2)∶182-186 |
| [18] | Isci D, SahinSaglam A M, Alkis H, et al. Effects of fluorosis on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a self-etching primer [J]. Eur JOrthodont, 2011, 33(2)∶161-166 |
| [19] | Adanir N. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel [J]. EurJOrthodont, 2009, 31(3)∶276-280 |
